EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 311 (2024) EPJ Web Conf., 311 (2024) 00019 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 311, 2024
The Fifth International Workshop on State of the Art in Nuclear Cluster Physics (SOTANCP5)
Article Number 00019
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202431100019
Published online 28 October 2024
  1. K.D. Launey, T. Dytrych, J.P. Draayer, Symmetryguided large-scale shell-model theory, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 89, 101 (review) (2016). 10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.02.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Dytrych, K.D. Launey, J.P. Draayer, D.J. Rowe, J.L. Wood, G. Rosensteel, C. Bahri, D. Langr, R.B. Baker, Physics of nuclei: Key role of an emergent symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 042501 (2020). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.042501 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. K.D. Launey, A. Mercenne, T. Dytrych, Nuclear dynamics and reactions in the ab initio symmetryadapted framework, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 253 (2021). 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-033316 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Ruotsalainen, J. Henderson, G. Hackman, G.H. Sargsyan, K.D. Launey et al., Isospin symmetry in B(E2) values: Coulomb excitation study of 21Mg, Phys. Rev. C 99, 051301 (2019). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.99.051301 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Henderson et al., Testing microscopically derived descriptions of nuclear collectivity: Coulomb excitation of 22Mg, Phys. Lett. B 782, 468 (2018). 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.05.064 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Williams, G.C. Ball, A. Chester et al., Structure of 28Mg and influence of the neutron pf shell, Phys. Rev. C 100, 014322 (2019). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.100.014322 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. K.D. Launey, A. Mercenne, G.H. Sargsyan, H. Shows, R.B. Baker, M.E. Miora, T. Dytrych, J.P. Draayer, Emergent clustering phenomena in the framework of the ab initio symmetryadapted no-core shell model, in Proceedings of SOTANCP4, May 2018, Galveston, Texas (AIP Conference Proceedings, 2018), Vol. 2038, p. 020004, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5078823 [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Burrows et al., Response functions and giant monopole resonances for light to mediummass nuclei from the ab initio symmetry-adapted no-core shell model, arXiv:2312.09782 (2024). 10.48550/arXiv.2312.09782 [Google Scholar]
  9. R.B. Baker, C. Elster, T. Dytrych, K.D. Launey, Ab initio leading order effective potential for elastic proton scattering based on the symmetry-adapted nocore shell model, Phys. Rev. C 110, 034605 (2024). 10.1103/PhysRevC.110.034605 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. O.M. Molchanov, K.D. Launey, A. Mercenne, G.H. Sargsyan, T. Dytrych, J.P. Draayer, Machine learning approach to pattern recognition in nuclear dynamics from the ab initio symmetry-adapted nocore shell model, Phys. Rev. C 105, 034306 (2022). 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.034306 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M.T. Burkey, G. Savard, A.T. Gallant, N.D. Scielzo, J.A. Clark, T.Y. Hirsh, L. Varriano, G.H. Sargsyan, K.D. Launey et al., Improved limit on tensor currents in the weak interaction from 8Li /3 decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 202502 (2022). 10.1103/Phys-RevLett.128.202502 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. G.H. Sargsyan, K.D. Launey, M.T. Burkey, A.T. Gallant, N.D. Scielzo, G. Savard, A. Mercenne, T. Dytrych, D. Langr et al., Impact of clustering on the 8Li /3 decay and recoil form factors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 202503 (2022). 10.1103/Phys-RevLett.128.202503 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Longfellow, A.T. Gallant, G.H. Sargsyan et al., Improved tensor current limit from 8B /3 decay including new recoil-order calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 142502 (2024). 10.1103/Phys-RevLett.132.142502 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Barker, H. Hay, P. Treacy, 0+ states of 8Be, Aust. J. Phys. 21, 239 (1968). 10.1071/PH680239 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. F. Barker, 2+ states of 8Be, Aust. J. Phys. 22, 293 (1969). 10.1071/PH690293 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. E.K. Warburton, R-matrix analysis of the β∓-delayed alpha spectra from the decay of 8Li and 8B, Phys. Rev. C 33, 303 (1986). 10.1103/PhysRevC.33.303 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Barker, Delayed alpha spectra from the beta decay of 8Li and 8B, Aust. J. Phys. 42, 25 (1989). 10.1071/PH890025 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Hyldegaard, Ph.D. thesis, Aarhus University (2010), http://phys.au.dk/fileadmin/site_files/publikationer/phd/Solveig_Hyldegaard.pdf [Google Scholar]
  19. B. Haesner, W. Heeringa, H.O. Klages et al., Measurement of the 3He and 4He total neutron cross sections up to 40 MeV, Phys. Rev. C 28, 995 (1983). 10.1103/PhysRevC.28.995 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. J.H. Coon, Total neutron cross sections of the hydrogen and helium isotopes, Nuclear Physics 12, 291 (1959). 10.1016/0029-5582(59)90175-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Bashkin, F.P. Mooring, B. Petree, Total cross section of helium for fast neutrons, Phys. Rev. 82, 378 (1951). 10.1103/PhysRev.82.378 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Burrows, K.D. Launey, A. Mercenne, R.B. Baker, G.H. Sargsyan, T. Dytrych, D. Langr, Ab initio translationally invariant nucleon-nucleus optical potentials, Phys. Rev. C 109, 014616 (2024). 10.1103/PhysRevC.109.014616 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. D.C. Mumma et al., Astrophysically important alpha capture reaction on 15O from ab initio calculations of 19Ne, (to be submitted) (2024). [Google Scholar]
  24. I.J. Thompson, F.M. Nunes, Nuclear Reactions for Astrophysics: Principles, Calculation and Applications of Low-Energy Reactions (Cambridge University Press, 2009), https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152150 [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Lovell, F. Nunes, Systematic uncertainties in direct reaction theories, J. Phys. G 42, 034014 (2015). 10.1088/0954-3899/42/3/034014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. F. Capuzzi, C. Mahaux, Relationship between Feshbach’s and Green’s function theories of the nucleon–nucleus mean field, Annals of Physics 281, 223 (2000). 10.1006/aphy.2000.6011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Mahaux, H. Ngo, G.R. Satchler, Causality and the threshold anomaly of the nucleus-nucleus potential, Nucl. Phys. A 449, 354 (1986). 10.1016/0375-9474(86)90009-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. C. Mahaux, R. Sartor, Single-Particle Motion in Nuclei (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1991), pp. 1–223, ISBN 978-1-4613-9910-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9910-0_1 [Google Scholar]
  29. W.H. Dickhoff, D. Van Neck, Many-Body Theory Exposed!, 2nd edn. (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2008), https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/ 10.1142/6821 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. K.M. Watson, Multiple scattering and the manybody problem—applications to photomeson production in complex nuclei, Phys. Rev. 89, 575 (1953). 10.1103/PhysRev.89.575 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. A.K. Kerman, H. McManus, R.M. Thaler, The scattering of fast nucleons from nuclei, Ann. Phys. 8, 551 (1959). 10.1016/0003-4916(59)90076-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. E.R. Siciliano, R.M. Thaler, Spectator expansion in multiple scattering theory, Phys. Rev. C 16, 1322 (1977). 10.1103/PhysRevC.16.1322 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. J. Rotureau, P. Danielewicz, G. Hagen, F.M. Nunes, T. Papenbrock, Optical potential from first principles, Phys. Rev. C 95, 024315 (2017). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.95.024315 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. J. Rotureau, P. Danielewicz, G. Hagen, G.R. Jansen, F.M. Nunes, Microscopic optical potentials for calcium isotopes, Phys. Rev. C 98, 044625 (2018). 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044625 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Idini, C. Barbieri, P. Navrátil, Ab initio optical potentials and nucleon scattering on medium mass nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 092501 (2019). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.092501 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Burrows, R.B. Baker, C. Elster, S.P. Weppner, K.D. Launey, P. Maris, G. Popa, Ab initio leading order effective potentials for elastic nucleonnucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. C 102, 034606 (2020). 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.034606 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Vorabbi, M. Gennari, P. Finelli, C. Giusti, P. Navrátil, R. Machleidt, Elastic proton scattering off nonzero spin nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 105, 014621 (2022). 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.014621 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. C.W. Johnson, K.D. Launey et al., From bound states to the continuum, J. Phys. G 47, 23001 (2020), arXiv:1912.00451. 10.1088/1361-6471/abb129 [Google Scholar]
  39. T.R. Whitehead, Y. Lim, J.W. Holt, Proton elastic scattering on calcium isotopes from chiral nuclear optical potentials, Phys. Rev. C 100, 014601 (2019). 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014601 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. J. Rotureau, G. Potel, W. Li, F.M. Nunes, Merging ab initio theory and few-body approach for (d, p) reactions, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 47, 065103 (2020). 10.1088/1361-6471/ab8530 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. K.S. Becker, K.D. Launey, A. Ekstrom, T. Dytrych, Ab initio symmetry-adapted emulator for studying emergent collectivity and clustering in nuclei, Front. Phys. 11, 1064601 (2023). 10.3389/fphy.2023.1064601 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. W. Huang, M. Wang, F. Kondev, G. Audi, S. Naimi, The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, and adjustment procedures, Chin. Phys. C 45, 030002 (2021). 10.1088/1674-1137/abddb0 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. A.C. Dreyfuss, K.D. Launey, J.E. Escher, G.H. Sargsyan, R.B. Baker, T. Dytrych, J.P. Draayer, Clustering and α-capture reaction rate from ab initio symmetry-adapted descriptions of 20Ne, Phys. Rev. C 102, 044608 (2020). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.102.044608 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. K.T. Hecht, W. Zahn, An SU(3) approach to nuclear multi-cluster problems, Nucl. Phys. A 318, 1 (1979). 10.1016/0375-9474(79)90465-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Y. Suzuki, Cluster and Symplectic Excitations in Nu-clei, Nucl. Phys. A 448, 395 (1986). 10.1016/0375-9474(86)90335-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Y. Suzuki, K.T. Hecht, Symplectic and Cluster Excitations in Nuclei: Evaluation of interaction matrix elements, Nucl. Phys. A 455, 315 (1986). 10.1016/0375-9474(86)90021-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Y. Suzuki, K.T. Hecht, The sub-Coulomb 12C+12C resonances in a microscopic 12C+12C, α+20Ne, 8Be+16O cluster basis, Nucl. Phys. A 388, 102 (1982). 10.1016/0375-9474(82)90511-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. K.T. Hecht, E.J. Reske, T.H. Seligman, W. Zahn, Spectroscopic amplitudes for complex cluster systems, Nucl. Phys. A 356, 146 (1981). 10.1016/0375-9474(81)90123-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. D. Tilley, C. Cheves, J. Godwin et al., Energy levels of light nuclei A=5, 6, 7, Nuclear Physics A 708, 3 (2002). 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)00597-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. A. Ekström, G. Baardsen, C. Forssén et al., An optimized chiral nucleon-nucleon interaction at next-tonext-to-leading order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 192502 (2013). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.192502 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. M.D. Mckay, R.J. Beckman, W.J. Conover, A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics 42, 55 (2000). 10.1080/00401706.2000.10485979 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. K.S. Becker, A.R. Baniecki, A.W. Kelly, K.D. Launey, S.T. Marley, A. Mercenne, T. Dytrych, J.P. Draayer, Quantifying uncertainties in α-nucleus re-action dynamics informed from first principles, Nucl. Phys. A, in preparation (2024). [Google Scholar]
  53. W.P. Good et al., Microscopic description of the 12C+alpha clustering in shape-coexisting states of 16O, (to be submitted) (2024). [Google Scholar]
  54. T. Sumikama, K. Matsuta, T. Nagatomo et al., Test of the conserved vector current hypothesis by a /3-ray angular distribution measurement in the mass-8 sys-tem, Phys. Rev. C 83, 065501 (2011). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.83.065501 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. L. De Braeckeleer, E.G. Adelberger, Gundlach et al., Radiative decays of the 16.6 and 16.9 MeV states in 8Be and tests of the conservation of the vector current in the A=8 multiplet, Phys. Rev. C 51, 2778 (1995). 10.1103/PhysRevC.51.2778 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. M. Munch, O. Sølund Kirsebom, J.A. Swartz, K. Riisager, H.O.U. Fynbo, Measurement of the full excitation spectrum of the 7Li(p,y)αα reaction at 441 keV, Phys. Lett. B 782, 779 (2018). 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.06.013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. E. Caurier, P. Navrátil, W.E. Ormand, J.P. Vary, Intruder states in 8Be, Phys. Rev. C 64, 051301(R) (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevC.64.051301 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. P. Maris, Ab initio calculations for Be-isotopes with JISP16, in J. Phys. Conf. Ser. (IOP Publishing, 2013), Vol. 445, p. 012035, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/445/1/012035 [Google Scholar]
  59. D. Rodkin, Y.M. Tchuvil’sky, Description of alphaclustering of 8Be nucleus states in high-precision theoretical approach, Chin. Phys. C 44, 124105 (2020). 10.1088/1674-1137/abb4d4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. D. Tilley, J. Kelley, J. Godwin et al., Energy levels of light nuclei A=8,9,10, Nucl. Phys. A 745, 155 (2004). 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.09.059 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. A.C. Dreyfuss, K.D. Launey, T. Dytrych, J.P. Draayer, C. Bahri, Hoyle state and rotational features in Carbon-12 within a no-core shell model framework, Phys. Lett. B 727, 511 (2013). 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.048 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. A.R. Baniecki et al., Alpha-12C effective cluster potential with uncertainties from the many-body dynamics of 16O, (to be submitted) (2024). [Google Scholar]
  63. A.W. Kelly et al., Bayesian uncertainty quantification in nuclear reaction theory for astrophysical applications, (to be submitted) (2024). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.