EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 314 (2024) EPJ Web Conf., 314 (2024) 00018 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 314, 2024
QCD@Work 2024 - International Workshop on Quantum Chromodynamics - Theory and Experiment
Article Number 00018
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202431400018
Published online 10 December 2024
  1. A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, Linear confinement and AdS/QCD, Phys. Rev. D 74, 015005 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.015005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Karapetyan and R. da Rocha, Configurational entropy of heavy-quark QCD exotica, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) No.10, 993 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01942-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Colangelo and F. Loparco, Configurational Entropy can disentangle conventional hadrons from exotica, Phys. Lett. B 788, 500–504 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.11.053 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. A. Martin Contreras and A. Vega, Holographic stability for non-qq candidates, Phys. Rev. D 108 No.12, 126024 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.126024 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, Large N field theories, string theory and gravity, Phys. Rept. 323, 183–386 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00083-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Polchinski and M. J. Strassler, Deep inelastic scattering and gauge / string duality, JHEP 05, 012 (2003). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Boschi-Filho and N. R. F. Braga, QCD / string holographic mapping and glueball mass spectrum, Eur. Phys. J. C 32, 529–533 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2003-01526-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity, Annals Phys. 144, 249 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(82)90116-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, QCD and a holographic model of hadrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 261602 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.26160 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. N. R. F. Braga, M. A. Martin Contreras and S. Diles, Decay constants in soft wall AdS/QCD revisited, Phys. Lett. B 763, 203–207 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.10.046 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. A. Martin Contreras and A. Vega, Nonlinear Regge trajectories with AdS/QCD, Phys. Rev. D 102 No.4, 046007 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.046007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Navas et al. [Particle Data Group], Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, No.3, 030001 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. W. S. Hou, et al, Glueball states in a constituent gluon model, Phys. Rev. D 64, 014028 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.014028 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C. P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo and C. Z. Yuan, The XYZ states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rept. 873, 1–154 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell and E. S. Swanson, Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143–194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.11.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Gleiser and N. Stamatopoulos, Information Content of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 86, 045004 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.045004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Gleiser and D. Sowinski,Information-Entropic Stability Bound for Compact Objects: Application to Q-Balls and the Chandrasekhar Limit of Polytropes, Phys. Lett. B 727, 272–275 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Hamilton, D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D. A. Lowe, Holographic representation of local bulk operators, Phys. Rev. D 74, 066009 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.066009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. K. H. Rehren, Local quantum observables in the anti-de Sitter conformal QFT correspondence, Phys. Lett. B 493, 383–388 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01168-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. I. Bena,On the construction of local fields in the bulk of AdS(5) and other spaces, Phys. Rev. D 62, 066007 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.62.066007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. E. Bernardini and R. da Rocha, Entropic information of dynamical AdS/QCD holographic models, Phys. Lett. B 762, 107–115 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.023 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. A. Martin Contreras, A. Vega and S. Diles, Isospectrality and configurational entropy as testing tools for bottom-up AdS/QCD, Phys. Lett. B 854, 138723 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138723 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.