EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 315 (2024) EPJ Web Conf., 315 (2024) 01021 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 315, 2024
International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders (LCWS2024)
Article Number 01021
Number of page(s) 11
Section Physics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202431501021
Published online 18 December 2024
  1. S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani, “Weak Interactions with Lepton-Hadron Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970), 1285-1292 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1285 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Eilam, J. L. Hewett and A. Soni, “Rare decays of the top quark in the standard and two Higgs doublet models,” Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991), 1473-1484 [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999), 039901] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.1473 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. W. S. Hou, “Tree level t —> c h or h —> t anti-c decays,” Phys. Lett. B 296 (1992), 179-184 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90823-M [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Atwood, L. Reina and A. Soni, “Phenomenology of two Higgs doublet models with flavor changing neutral currents,” Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997), 3156-3176 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.3156 [arXiv:hep-ph/9609279 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. L. Lopez, D. V. Nanopoulos and R. Rangarajan, “New supersymmetric contributions to t → c V,” Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997), 3100-3106 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3100 [arXiv:hep-ph/9702350 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. M. Yang, B. L. Young and X. Zhang, “Flavor changing top quark decays in r parity violating SUSY,” Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998), 055001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.055001 [arXiv:hep-ph/9705341 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Eilam, A. Gemintern, T. Han, J. M. Yang and X. Zhang, “Top quark rare decay t —> ch in R-parity violating SUSY,” Phys. Lett. B 510 (2001), 227-235 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00598-6 [arXiv:hep-ph/0102037 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, “Top flavor-changing neutral interactions: Theoretical expectations and experimental detection,” Acta Phys. Polon. B 35 (2004), 2695-2710 [arXiv:hep-ph/0409342 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Gaitan, O. G. Miranda and L. G. Cabral-Rosetti, “Rare top and Higgs decays in alternative left-right symmetric models,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005), 034018 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.034018 [arXiv:hep-ph/0410268 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Frank and I. Turan, “t → cg, cγ, cZ in the left-right supersymmetric model,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005), 035008 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.035008 [arXiv:hep-ph/0506197 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Arhrib, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005), 075016 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.075016 [arXiv:hep-ph/0510107 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Bejar, “Flavor changing neutral decay effects in models with two Higgs boson doublets: Applications to LHC Physics,” [arXiv:hep-ph/0606138 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Agashe, G. Perez and A. Soni, “Collider Signals of Top Quark Flavor Violation from a Warped Extra Dimension,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007), 015002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.015002 [arXiv:hep-ph/0606293 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. J. Cao, G. Eilam, M. Frank, K. Hikasa, G. L. Liu, I. Turan and J. M. Yang, “SUSY-induced FCNC top-quark processes at the large hadron collider,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007), 075021 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.075021 [arXiv:hep-ph/0702264 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. I. Baum, G. Eilam and S. Bar-Shalom, “Scalar flavor changing neutral currents and rare top quark decays in a two H iggs doublet model ’for the top quark’,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008), 113008 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.113008 [arXiv:0802.2622 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. X. F. Han, L. Wang and J. M. Yang, “Top quark FCNC decays and productions at LHC in littlest Higgs model with T-parity,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009), 015018 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.015018 [arXiv:0903.5491 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Agashe and R. Contino, “Composite Higgs-Mediated FCNC,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009), 075016 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.075016 [arXiv:0906.1542 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. T. J. Gao, T. F. Feng and J. B. Chen, “t → cγ and t → cg in warped extra dimensions,” JHEP 02 (2013), 029 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)029 [arXiv:1303.0082 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Cao, C. Han, L. Wu, J. M. Yang and M. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) no.9, 3058 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3058-1 [arXiv:1404.1241 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Dedes, M. Paraskevas, J. Rosiek, K. Suxho and K. Tamvakis, “Rare Top-quark Decays to Higgs boson in MSSM,” JHEP 11 (2014), 137 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2014)137 [arXiv:1409.6546 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Abbas, A. Celis, X. Q. Li, J. Lu and A. Pich, “Flavour-changing top decays in the aligned two-Higgs-doublet model,” JHEP 06 (2015), 005 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2015)005 [arXiv:1503.06423 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  22. F. J. Botella, G. C. Branco, M. Nebot and M. N. Rebelo, “Flavour Changing Higgs Couplings in a Class of Two Higgs Doublet Models,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) no.3, 161 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3993-0 [arXiv:1508.05101 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. U. K. Dey and T. Jha, “Rare top decays in minimal and nonminimal universal extra dimension models,” Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) no.5, 056011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.056011 [arXiv:1602.03286 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Diaz-Furlong, M. Frank, N. Pourtolami, M. Toharia and R. Xoxocotzi, “Flavor-changing decays of the top quark in 5D warped models,” Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) no.3, 036001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.036001 [arXiv:1603.08929 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Q. Hung, Y. X. Lin, C. S. Nugroho and T. C. Yuan, “Top Quark Rare Decays via Loop-Induced FCNC Interactions in Extended Mirror Fermion Model,” Nucl. Phys. B 927 (2018), 166-183 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.12.014 [arXiv:1709.01690 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Banerjee, M. Chala and M. Spannowsky, “Top quark FCNCs in extended Higgs sectors,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) no.8, 683 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6150-0 [arXiv:1806.02836 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. T. J. Kim, P. Ko, J. Li, J. Park and P. Wu, “Correlation between RD(∗) and top quark FCNC decays in leptoquark models,” JHEP 07 (2019), 025 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)025 [arXiv:1812.08484 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Bolaños, R. Sánchez-Vélez and G. Tavares-Velasco, “Flavor changing neutral current decays t → cX (X = γ, g, Z, H) and t → cℓ¯ℓ (ℓ = µ, τ) via scalar leptoquarks,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) no.8, 700 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7211-8 [arXiv:1907.05877 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Y. Liu, B. Yan and R. Zhang, “Loop induced top quark FCNC through top quark and dark matter interactions,” Phys. Lett. B 827 (2022), 136964 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136964 [arXiv:2103.07859 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. C. H. Chen and T. Nomura, “Scotogenic top-quark FCNC decays,” Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) no.9, 095005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.095005 [arXiv:2204.01214 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Crivellin, M. Kirk, T. Kitahara and F. Mescia, “Large t→cZ as a sign of vectorlike quarks in light of the W mass,” Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) no.3, L031704 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L031704 [arXiv:2204.05962 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. C. H. Chen, C. W. Chiang and C. W. Su, “Top-quark FCNC decays, LFVs, lepton g – 2, and W mass anomaly with inert charged Higgses,” J. Phys. G 51 (2024) no.8, 085001 doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ad560e [arXiv:2301.07070 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Frank, B. Fuks, S. K. Garg and P. Poulose, “Flavour-changing top quark decays in the alternative left-right model,” Phys. Lett. B 850 (2024), 138548 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138548 [arXiv:2312.12523 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Jueid and S. Kanemura, “Dark matter as the trigger of flavor changing neutral current decays of the top quark,” [arXiv:2402.08652 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Tumasyan et al. [CMS], “Search for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark and the Higgs boson decaying to a bottom quark-antiquark pair at √s = 13 TeV,” JHEP 02 (2022), 169 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2022)169 [arXiv:2112.09734 [hep-ex]]. [Google Scholar]
  36. G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], “Search for flavour-changing neutral-current couplings between the top quark and the photon with the ATLAS detector at s=13 TeV,” Phys. Lett. B 842 (2023), 137379 [erratum: Phys. Lett. B 847 (2024), 138286] doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137379 [arXiv:2205.02537 [hep-ex]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], “Search for flavor-changing neutral-current couplings between the top quark and the Z boson with proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) no.3, 032019 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.032019 [arXiv:2301.11605 [hep-ex]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], “Search for flavour-changing neutral tqH interactions with H → γγ in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector,” JHEP 12 (2023), 195 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)195 [arXiv:2309.12817 [hep-ex]]. [Google Scholar]
  39. J. j. Cao, G. l. Liu and J. M. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C 41 (2005), 381-391 doi:10.1140/epjc/s2005-02222-1 [arXiv:hep-ph/0311166 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. J. j. Cao, G. l. Liu, J. M. Yang and H. j. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007), 014004 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.014004 [arXiv:hep-ph/0703308 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. S. Khatibi and M. Moallemi, “Probing FCNC couplings in single top-quark production associated with a neutral gauge boson in future lepton colliders,” J. Phys. G 48 (2021) no.12, 125004 doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac09dd [arXiv:2106.08231 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. W. Liu and H. Sun, “Top FCNC interactions through dimension six four-fermion operators at the electron proton collider,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.1, 015011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.015011 [arXiv:1906.04884 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. S. Bhattacharya, S. Jahedi, S. Nandi and A. Sarkar, “Probing flavor constrained SMEFT operators through tc production at the muon collider,” JHEP 07 (2024), 061 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)061 [arXiv:2312.14872 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Y. B. Liu and S. Moretti, “Probing the top-Higgs boson FCNC couplings via the h → γγ channel at the HE-LHC and FCC-hh,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) no.7, 075029 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.075029 [arXiv:2002.05311 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. K. Y. Oyulmaz, A. Senol, H. Denizli and O. Cakir, “Top quark anomalous FCNC production via tqg couplings at FCC-hh,” Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) no.11, 115023 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.115023 [arXiv:1902.03037 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. C. Arina, B. Fuks, J. Heisig, M. Krämer, L. Mantani and L. Panizzi, “Comprehensive exploration of t-channel simplified models of dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) no.11, 115007 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.115007 [arXiv:2307.10367 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. M. Becker, E. Copello, J. Harz, K. A. Mohan and D. Sengupta, “Impact of Sommerfeld effect and bound state formation in simplified t-channel dark matter models,” JHEP 08 (2022), 145 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)145 [arXiv:2203.04326 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. C. Arina, B. Fuks, L. Mantani, H. Mies, L. Panizzi and J. Salko, “Closing in on t-channel simplified dark matter models,” Phys. Lett. B 813 (2021), 136038 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.136038 [arXiv:2010.07559 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. C. Arina, B. Fuks and L. Mantani, “A universal framework for t-channel dark matter models,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) no.5, 409 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7933-7 [arXiv:2001.05024 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. K. A. Mohan, D. Sengupta, T. M. P. Tait, B. Yan and C. P. Yuan, “Direct detection and LHC constraints on a t-channel simplified model of Majorana dark matter at one loop,” JHEP 05 (2019), 115 [erratum: JHEP 05 (2023), 232] doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)115 [arXiv:1903.05650 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. T. Hahn, “Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 140 (2001), 418-431 doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(01)00290-9 [arXiv:hep-ph/0012260 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. T. Hahn, “A Mathematica interface for FormCalc-generated code,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008), 217-221 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2007.09.004 [arXiv:hep-ph/0611273 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. T. Hahn, “Loop calculations with FeynArts, FormCalc, and LoopTools,” Acta Phys. Polon. B 30 (1999), 3469-3475 [arXiv:hep-ph/9910227 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  54. J. Gao, C. S. Li and H. X. Zhu, “Top Quark Decay at Next-to-Next-to Leading Order in QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) no.4, 042001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.042001 [arXiv:1210.2808 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  55. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, “A Minimal set of top anomalous couplings,” Nucl. Phys. B 812 (2009), 181-204 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.12.012 [arXiv:0811.3842 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, “A Minimal set of top-Higgs anomalous couplings,” Nucl. Phys. B 821 (2009), 215-227 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.06.022 [arXiv:0904.2387 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. T. Han, M. Hosch, K. Whisnant, B. L. Young and X. Zhang, “Single top quark production via FCNC couplings at hadron colliders,” Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998), 073008 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.073008 [arXiv:hep-ph/9806486 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  58. G. Durieux, F. Maltoni and C. Zhang, “Global approach to top-quark flavor-changing interactions,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) no.7, 074017 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.074017 [arXiv:1412.7166 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.