EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 322 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 322 (2025) 10001 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 322, 2025
7th International Workshop on Compound-Nuclear Reactions and Related Topics (CNR*24)
Article Number 10001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Nuclear Data
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202532210001
Published online 14 March 2025
  1. E.T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechanics, Phys. Rev. 106, 620 (1957). 10.1103/PhysRev.106.620 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal 3, 379-423 (1948). 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ed. M. Herman, A. Trkov, ENDF-6 Manual, Report BNL-90365-2009 Rev.1 (2009). https://www. oecd-nea.org/dbdata/data/manual-endf/endf102.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. A.J.M. Plompen et al., The joint evaluated fission and fusion nuclear data library, JEFF-3.3, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 181 (2020). 10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00141-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D.A. Brown et al., ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data, Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 1-142 (2018). 10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Osamu Iwamoto et al., Japanese evaluated nuclear data library version 5: JENDL-5, J.Nucl Science and Technology 60, 1-60 (2022). 10.1080/00223131.2022.2141903 [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhigang Ge et al., CENDL-3.2: The new version of Chinese general purpose evaluated nuclear data library, EPJ Web of Conferences 239, 09001 (2020). /10.1051/epjconf/202023909001 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Koning, Bayesian Monte Carlo Method for Nuclear Data Evaluation, Nucl. Data Sheets 123, 207-213 (2015). 10.1016/j.nds.2014.12.036 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D.L. Smith, Unified Monte Carlo Approach to Fast Neutron Cross Section Data Evaluation, in Proc. of the 8th International Topical Mtg. on Nucl. Applics. and Util. of Accelerators, Pocatello, July 29 – August 2, p. 736 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Capote, D.L. Smith, A. Trkov, M. Meghzifene, A New Formulation of the Unified Monte Carlo Approach (UMC-B) and Cross-Section Evaluation for the Dosimetry Reaction 55Mn(n,γ)56Mn, J. ASTM International 9, JAI104115JAI, 179-196 (2012). 10.1520/JAI104115 [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Capote, D.L. Smith, A. Trkov, Nuclear data evaluation methodology including estimates of covariances EPJ Web of Conferences 8, 04001 (2010). 10.1051/epjconf/20100804001 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Bauge, Full Model Nuclear Data and Covariance Evaluation Process Using TALYS, Total Monte Carlo and Backward-forward Monte Carlo, Nucl. Data Sheets 123, 201-206 (2015). 10.1016/j.nds.2014.12.035 [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Pearson, On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space, Philosophical Magazine 2, 559 (1901). 10.1080/14786440109462720 [Google Scholar]
  14. M.T. Pigni, H. Leeb, Uncertainty estimates of evaluated 56Fe cross sections based on extensive modelling at energies beyond 20 MeV in: Proc. Int. Workshop on Nuclear Data for the Transmutation of Nuclear Waste (GSI Darmstadt, Darmstadt, 2003) PO21. [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Leeb, D. Neudecker, Th. Srdinko, Consistent Procedure for Nuclear Data Evaluation Based on Modeling, Nucl. Data Sheets 109, 2762 (2009). 10.1016/j.nds.2008.11.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Neudecker, R. Capote, H. Leeb, Impact of model defect and experimental uncertainties on evaluated output, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 723, 163 (2013). 10.1016/j.nima.2013.05.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Schnabel, Large Scale Bayesian Nuclear Data Evaluation with Consistent Model Defects, PhD Thesis, TU Wien (2015). [Google Scholar]
  18. A.M. Lane, R.G. Thomas, R-matrix theory of nuclear reactions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 30, 257 (1958). 10.1103/RevModPhys.30.257 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  19. N.M. Larson, Updated Users Guide for SAMMY: Multilevel R-Matrix Fits to Neutron Data Using Bayes Equations, ORNL/TM-9179/R8 ENDF-364/2 (October 2008). [Google Scholar]
  20. M.C. Moxon, T.C. Ware, C.J. Dean, REFIT2009: A Least-Square Program for Resonance Analysis of Neutron Transmission, Capture and Scattering Data, Users Guide for REFIT-2009-10 (April 2010). https://databank.io.oecd-nea.org/codes/refit/ [Google Scholar]
  21. R.E. Azuma, E. Uberseder, E.C. Simpson, C.R. Brune, H. Constantini, R.J. de Boer, J. Gönnes, M. Heil, P.J. LeBlanc, C. Ugalde, M. Wiescher, Phys. Rev. C 81, 045805 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.045805 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Leeb, T. Srdinko, Towards a Bayesian evaluation technique for light nuclear systems, EPJ web of Conferences 294, 04006 (2024). 10.1051/epjconf/202429404006 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. V.F. Turchin, V.P. Kozlov, M.S. Malkevich, Usp. Fiz. Nauk. 102, 345 (1970) [Sov. Phys. Usp. 13, 681 (1971)]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. G. Schnabel, H. Leeb, A modified Generalized Least Squares method for large scale nuclear data evaluation, Nucl. Instr.. Meth. A 841, 87 (2017). 10.1016/j.nima.2016.10.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.