EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 323 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 323 (2025) 06004 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 323, 2025
22nd International Metrology Congress (CIM2025)
Article Number 06004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Robotization, Automatization & Dynamic Measurement
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202532306004
Published online 07 April 2025
  1. S Eichstädt et al 2016 Metrologia 53 S125 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. T. J. Esward, C. Elster, J. P. Hessling, IMEKO 2009 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Schäfer, S. Eichstädt, IMEKO TC3 2017 [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrew Dienstfrey and Paul D Hale 2014 Meas. Sci. Technol. 25 035001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. K. H. Ruhm, Measurement 79 (2016) 276–284 [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Eichstädt, B. Arendacká, A. Link, C. Elster, EPJ Web of Conferences, 77, 0000 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  7. S Eichstädt, K Ruhm, A Shestakov, Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1065 (2018) 212018 [Google Scholar]
  8. Trevor Esward et al 2019 Metrologia 56 015002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Vasilevskyi et al, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 10808 108082E-1 [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Markovsky, Control Engineering Practice 43 (2015) 85–93 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Eichstädt (ed.) Dynamic Measuring Systems: Fundamentals and application of time-dependent measurements, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110713107 [Google Scholar]
  12. S Eichstädt et al 2018 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1065 212018 [Google Scholar]
  13. K.H. Ruhm, Measurement 79 (2016) 276–284 [Google Scholar]
  14. Esward T J, Elster C and Hessling P 2009 Analysis of dynamic measurements: new challenges require new solutions Proc. 19th IMEKO World Congress (Lisbon, Portugal, 6–11 Sept.) pp 2307–10 [Google Scholar]
  15. Andrew Dienstfrey and Paul D Hale 2014 Meas. Sci. Technol. 25 035001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eichstädt S 2012 “Analysis of Dynamic Measurements Evaluation of Dynamic Measurement Uncertainty”, PhD Thesis, TU Berlin [Google Scholar]
  17. Elster C and Link A 2008 “Uncertainty evaluation for dynamic measurements modelled by a linear time-invariant system”, Metrologia, 45(4), 464–473 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Hessling, “A novel method of dynamic correction in the time domain”, Meas. Sci. Technol. 19, 075101 (10pp), 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Hessling, “A novel method of estimating dynamic measurement errors”, Meas. Sci. Technol. 17, pp. 2740–2750, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  20. J P Hessling 2011 Meas. Sci. Technol. 22 105105 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Elster C, Eichstädt S, and Link A 2009 Uncertainty evaluation of dynamic measurements in line with the GUM Proc. 19th IMEKO World Congress (Lisbon, Portugal, 6–11 Sept.) pp 2311–14 [Google Scholar]
  22. O. Vasilevskyi et al, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 10808 108082E-1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Trevor Esward et al 2019 Metrologia 56 015002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Eichstädt, B. Arendacká, A. Link, C. Elster, EPJ Web of Conferences, 77, 0000 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  25. S Eichstädt et al 2016 Meas. Sci. Technol. 27 125009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Link and C. Elster, “Uncertainty evaluation for IIR filtering using a state-space approach”, Meas. Sci. Technol. 20, 055104 (5pp), 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Dizdar, B. Aydemir, C. Vatan, Evaluation of the effect of dynamic verification on different types of force sensors, Joint IMEKO TC3, T5, TC16 and TC22 International Conference, 2022, DOI: 10.21014/tc3-2022.012 [Google Scholar]
  28. Mitra Djamal, Kazuhide Watanabe, Kyohei Irisa, Irfa Aji Prayogi, Akihiro Takita, Takao Yamaguchi and Yusaku Fujii, Metrol. Meas. Syst., Vol. XXI (2014), No. 1, pp. 59–66, DOI: 10.2478/mms-2014-0006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nicholas Vlajic and Ako Chijioke 2016 Metrologia 53 S136, doi:10.1088/00261394/53/4/S136 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Misaki Hamaji, Atsuhiro Nishino, Koji Ogushi, Measurement: Sensors 18 (2021) 100183 [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Tao Li, B. Xianglong Ma, Zhiqiang Qiao, Negative step dynamic torque calibration machine, Physics Conference Series, vol. 1740, no. 1, pp. 208–212, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  32. Misaki Hamaji et al 2022 Meas. Sci. Technol. 33 115901, doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ac8441 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. André Schäfer, Dynamic measurements as an emerging field in industrial metrology, PTBMitteilungen 125 (2015), No. 2, pp 62–67 [Google Scholar]
  34. Y. Yamakawa, T. Yamazaki, Simplified model of mass measurement system with consideration of variation of fulcrum position, Joint IMEKO TC3, T5, TC16 and TC22 International Conference, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  35. André Schäfer, Sascha Eichstädt, Evaluation of dynamic measurement uncertainty for industrial applications, IMEKO 23rd TC3, 13th TC5 and 4th TC22 Int. Conf., 30 May to 1 June, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  36. IPCC, 2023: Sections. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 35–115, doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647 [Google Scholar]
  37. IEA, Statista 2024 [Google Scholar]
  38. R D Reitz et al., IJER editorial: The future of the internal combustion engine, International J of Engine Research 2020, Vol. 21(1) 3–10, DOI: 10.1177/1468087419877990 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jan Hjelmgren, Dynamic measurement of pressure a literature survey, SP Report 2002:34, 64p. ISBN 91-7848-925-3 [Google Scholar]
  40. Felix Leach, Gautam Kalghatgi, Richard Stone, Paul Miles, The scope for improving the efficiency and environmental impact of internal combustion engines, Transportation Engineering 1 (2020) 100005, DOI: 10.1016/j.treng.2020.100005 [Google Scholar]
  41. Dahham, R.Y.; Wei, H.; Pan, J. Improving thermal eficiency of internal combustion engines: recent progress and remaining challenges. Energies 2022, 15, 6222. doi: 10.3390/en15176222 [Google Scholar]
  42. Erick Garcia, Strategies for improving efficiency and emissions in heavy-duty diesel engines, PhD dissertation, The University of Michigan 2021 [Google Scholar]
  43. J Salminen et al 2020 Metrologia 57 045006, doi: 10.1088/1681-7575/ab8fb9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Alberto Sposito, Dave Lowe, Gavin Sutton, Int. J. Turbomach. Propuls. Power 2020, 5, 31; doi:10.3390/ijtpp5040031 [Google Scholar]
  45. IEC 61083 [Google Scholar]
  46. https://e-treny.eu/objectives/ [Google Scholar]
  47. Final Publishable Report, 18SIB08 ComTraForce, https://www.euramet.org/ [Google Scholar]
  48. DKD-R 9-4 Dynamische kalibrierung von werkstoffprufmaschinen, doi: 10.7795/550.20240606 [Google Scholar]
  49. Nicholas Vlajic and Ako Chijioke 2016 Metrologia 53 S136, doi:10.1088/00261394/53/4/S136 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Final Publishable Report, 14IND14 MNmTorque, https://www.euramet.org/ [Google Scholar]
  51. Final Publishable Report, 19ENG08_WindEFCY, https://www.euramet.org/ [Google Scholar]
  52. Leonard Klaus, Michael Kobusch, Measurement: Sensors 18 (2021) 100149, doi: 10.1016/j.measen.2021.100149 [Google Scholar]
  53. Leonard Klaus et al 2015 Metrologia 52 72, doi:10.1088/0026-1394/52/1/72 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. L. Klaus, ACTA IMEKO, December 2020, Volume 9, Number 5, 200–204, ISSN: 221-870X [Google Scholar]
  55. Misaki Hamaji et al 2022 Meas. Sci. Technol. 33 115901, doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/ac8441 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. MyeongHyeon Kim, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 70, 2021, 1005207 [Google Scholar]
  57. R. Högström et al., Development of measurement and calibration techniques for dynamic pressures and temperatures – results and achievements, Joint IMEKO TC3, T5, TC16 and TC22 International Conference, 2022, doi: DOI: 10.21014/tc162022.005 [Google Scholar]
  58. Christophe Sarraf 2021 Meas. Sci. Technol. 32 015013, doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/aba56a [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. J Salminen et al 2020 Metrologia 57 045006, doi: 10.1088/1681-7575/ab8fb9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Richard Högström et al., Measurement: Sensors, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101686 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lamine Elkarous, Cyril Robbe, Marc Pirlot, JeanClaude Golinval, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 7, 201 (2016), doi: 10.1051/ijmqe/2016004 [Google Scholar]
  62. Rudi Anggoro Samodro; In-Mook Choi, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 095111 (2019); doi: 10.1063/1.5108865 [Google Scholar]
  63. In-Mook Choi et al., Measurement: Sensors, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101684 [Google Scholar]
  64. Thomas Platte, Measurement: Sensors 18 (2021) 100252, doi: 10.1016/j.measen.2021.100252 [Google Scholar]
  65. Yu Zhang, Jing Zu, Hong-Yan Zhang, Measurement 45 (2012) 1981–1988, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.04.024 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Gavin Sutton, Alexander Fateev, Miguel A. Rodríguez-Conejo, Juan Meléndez, Guillermo Guarnizo, International Journal of Thermophysics (2019) 40:99, doi:10.1007/s10765-019-2557-6 [Google Scholar]
  67. Final Publishable Report, 15NRM02, www.euramet.org [Google Scholar]
  68. A.-P. Elg, S. Passon, J Meisner and J. Hällström, “High voltage topologies for very fast transient measurements”, 21st International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering (ISH 2019), 26-30 August 2019, Budapest, Hungary, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3244216 [Google Scholar]
  69. A.-P. Elg, “Quantifying a transient recorder for traceable measurements of very fast transients”, Proceedings of Conference on Precision Electromagnetics Measurements (CPEM 2018), July, 8-13, 2018, Paris, France, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1473323 [Google Scholar]
  70. J. Hällström et al., Good Practice Guide on characterisation methods for UHV lightning impulse (LI) dividers, Deliverable Technical Report, 19ENG02 FutureEnergy, www.euramet.org [Google Scholar]
  71. T. Usuda et al., Report on the BIPM workshop on challenges in metrology for dynamic measurement, Rapport BIPM-2013/01, www.bipm.org [Google Scholar]
  72. www.ri.se/en/expertise-areas/test-demo/dynamic-pressure-testing [Google Scholar]
  73. www.ume.tubitak.gov.tr/en/laboratuvarlarimiz/infrastructure-1 [Google Scholar]
  74. Strategy 2022-2032. Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities (CCM), Version 1.8, 14 March 2022, www.bipm.org [Google Scholar]
  75. Strategy 2020-2030 Consultative Committee for Electricity and Magnetism (CCEM), 18 May 2021, www.bipm.org [Google Scholar]
  76. European Metrology Network Smart Electricity Grids Strategic Research Agenda, Version 1.0 (04/2023), www.euramet.org [Google Scholar]
  77. Strategic Research Agenda. European Metrology Network for Advanced Manufacturing, Version Live on JNP sharepoint, downloaded on 07.03.2024, www.euramet.org [Google Scholar]
  78. European Metrology Network for Mathematics and Statistics Strategic Research Agenda 2023 2033, Version 1.0 (07/2023), www.euramet.orgJ. Couturier, Y.H. Abou and E. Grolleau, Element of nuclear safety, (EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, 2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.