Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 323, 2025
22nd International Metrology Congress (CIM2025)
Article Number 14002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Uncertainty & Risk Assessment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202532314002
Published online 07 April 2025
  1. A. Ferrero, V. Scotti. Uncertainty and Conscious Decisions”. In: Forensic Metrology: An Introduction to the Fundamentals of Metrology for Judges, Lawyers and Forensic Scientists. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 115–124. ISBN: 978-3-031-14619-0. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-14619-0_8. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14619-0_8. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. M. Pou, L. Leblond. Smart Metrology: From the metrology of instrumentation to the metrology of decisions. Ed. by Array. 2017. DOI: 10.1051/metrology/201701007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1051/metrology/201701007 [Google Scholar]
  3. JCGM 100:2008. Evaluation of Measurement Data – Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, (GUM 1995 with minor corrections). Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. JCGM 106:2012. Evaluation of measurement data – The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. ISO/IEC Guide 98-4:2012. Uncertainty of measurement. Part 4: Role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. L. R. Pendrill. Using measurement uncertainty in decisionmaking and conformity assessment. Metrologia 51.4 (2014), pp. 206–218. DOI: 10.1088/00261394/51/4/S206. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/00261394/51/4/S206 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Allard, N. Fischer, I. Smith, P. Harris, L. Pendrill. Risk calculations for conformity assessment in practice. Ed. by Array. 2019. DOI: 10.1051/metrology/201916001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1051/metrology/201916001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Puydarrieux, S. et al. Role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment. Ed. by Array. 2019. DOI: 10.1051/ metrology/201916003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1051/metrology/201916003 [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Cruz de Oliveira, F. R. Lourenço. Risk of false conformity assessment applied to automotive fuel analysis: A multiparameter approach. Chemosphere 263 (2021), p. 128265. ISSN: 0045-6535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128265. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653520324607 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Ferrero, H. V. Jetti, S. Ronaghi, S. Salicone. A method to consider a maximum admissible risk in decision-making procedures based on measurement results. Acta IMEKO, vol.12, n. 2, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v12i2.1518 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Ferrero, H. V. Jetti, S. Ronaghi, S. Salicone. A general Monte-Carlo approach to consider a maximum admissible risk in decision-making procedures based on measurement results. Acta IMEKO, vol.12, n. 4, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v12i4.1602 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. JCGM 101:2008. Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 1 to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement – Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  13. Python scripts to find suitable acceptance limits according to ISO-IEC Guide 98-4. https://github.com/alessandroferrero/Acceptance-limits [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.