EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 338 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 338 (2025) 04001 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 338, 2025
ANIMMA 2025 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Research Reactors and Particle Accelerators
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202533804001
Published online 06 November 2025
  1. M. M. R. Williams, Random processes in nuclear reactors. Elsevier, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. D. Mosteller, “Validation suite for mcnp,” Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), Tech. Rep., 2002. [Google Scholar]
  3. B. C. Kiedrowski, F. B. Brown, N. A. Gibson, A. S. Bennett, and M. A. Gonzales, “Mcnp 6 shielding validation suite: Past, present, and future,” Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, vol. 105, pp. 559–561, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. D. C. Henzlova, N. Ensslin, A. Favalli, W. H. Geist, L. Holzleitner, K. Koehler, M. S. Krick, M. M. Pickrell, T. D. Reilly, J. E. Stewart, and K. D. Veal, Principles of Neutron Multiplicity. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 439–482. [Google Scholar]
  5. O. Pakari, T. Mager, P. Frajtag, A. Pautz, and V. Lamirand, “Gamma noise to non-invasively monitor nuclear research reactors,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 8409, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Feynman, F. D. Hoffmann, and R. Serber, “Dispersion of the neutron emission in u-235 fission,” Journal of Nuclear Energy (1954), vol. 3, no. 1-2, pp. 64–IN10, aug 1956. [Google Scholar]
  7. J.-P. Hudelot, R. Klann, B. Micklich, M. Antony, G. Perret, N. Thiollay, J.-M. Girard, V. Laval, and P. Leconte, “Minerve reactor characterization in support of the osmose program: Safety parameters,” in Proceedings of the PHYSOR-2004 Topical Meeting, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Perret, B. Geslot, A. Gruel, P. Blaise, J. Di-Salvo, G. De Izarra, C. Jammes, M. Hursin, and A. Pautz, “Kinetic parameter measurements in the minerve reactor,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 724–734, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Geslot, A. Gruel, A. Pepino, J. Di Salvo, G. de Izarra, C. Jammes, C. Destouches, and P. Blaise, “Pile noise experiment in minerve reactor to estimate kinetic parameters using various data processing methods,” in 2015 4th International Conference on Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications (ANIMMA). IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Gilad, B. Geslot, P. Blaise, and C. Dubi, “Sensitivity of power spectral density techniques to numerical parameters in analyzing neutron noise experiments,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 101, pp. 288–298, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. X. Doligez, A. Billebaud, S. Chabod, T. Chevret, D. Fourmentel, A. Krasa, A. Kochetkov, F. Lecolley, J. Lecouey, G. Lehaut et al., “Effective delayed neutron fraction measurement in the critical venus-f reactor using noise techniques,” in 2015 4th International Conference on Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications (ANIMMA). IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. dos Santos and R. Diniz, “A noise analysis approach for measuring effective delayed neutron parameters in the ipen/mb-01 reactor,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 769, no. 1. American Institute of Physics, 2005, pp. 1397–1400. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Goda, C. Bravo, T. Cutler, T. Grove, D. Hayes, J. Hutchinson, G. McKenzie, A. McSpaden, W. Myers, R. Sanchez et al., “A new era of nuclear criticality experiments: The first 10 years of godiva iv operations at ncerc,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 195, no. sup1, pp. S55–S79, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Saliba, V. Lamirand, W. Monange, F. Vitullo, M. Hursin, A. Pautz, and O. Pakari, “Measurement of the prompt neutron decay constant in a zero-power reactor using a novel 3d detector system,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, pp. 1–9, Mar. 2025. [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Locatelli, M. Mancini, and N. Todeschini, “Generation iv nuclear reactors: Current status and future prospects,” Energy Policy, vol. 61, pp. 1503–1520, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Lentchner, W. Fritsch, R. Crowder, N. Walton, A. Lewis, O. Chvala, K. Clarno, and V. Sobes, “Incorrect resonance escape probability in monte carlo codes due to the threshold approximation of temperature-dependent scattering,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 207, p. 110717, Nov. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Cutler, J. Lee, E. Luther, A. Maldonado, R. Sanchez, K. Stolte, H. Trellue, and N. Wynne, “The deimos experiment: Advanced reactor testbed,” Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), Tech. Rep., 2023. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. M. Hykes and R. M. Ferrer, “Validation of casmo5 neutron kinetics parameters,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 136, p. 107015, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  19. M. I. Radaideh, W. A. Wieselquist, and T. Kozlowski, “A new framework for sampling-based uncertainty quantification of the six-group reactor kinetic parameters,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 127, pp. 1–11, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Terranova and A. Zoia, “Generalized iterated fission probability for monte carlo eigenvalue calculations,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 108, pp. 57–66, Oct. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. E. Dumonteil, R. Bahran, T. Cutler, B. Dechenaux, T. Grove, J. Hutchinson, G. McKenzie, A. McSpaden, W. Monange, M. Nelson et al., “Patchy nuclear chain reactions,” Communications Physics, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 151, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. O. V. Pakari, “Experimental and numerical study of stochasticbranching noise in nuclear reactors,” Ph.D. dissertation, E´cole polytechnique fe´de´rale de Lausanne, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. S. A. Pozzi, E. Padovani, and M. Marseguerra, “Mcnp-polimi: a montecarlo code for correlation measurements,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 513, no. 3, pp. 550–558, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  24. J. A. Kulesza, T. R. Adams, J. C. Armstrong, S. R. Bolding, F. B. Brown, J. S. Bull, T. P. Burke, A. R. Clark, R. A. A. Forster III, J. F. Giron et al., “Mcnp® code version 6.3.0 theory & user manual,” Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, Tech. Rep. LA-UR-22-30006, Sep. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  25. P. K. Romano, N. E. Horelik, B. R. Herman, A. G. Nelson, B. Forget, and K. Smith, “Openmc: A state-of-the-art monte carlo code for research and development,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 82, pp. 90–97, Aug. 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), “Open-source nuclear code for reactor analysis – oncore,” 2024, accessed: Mar. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaea.org/topics/nuclear-power-reactors/open-source-nuclear-code-for-reactor-analysis-oncore [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Leppa¨nen, M. Pusa, T. Viitanen, V. Valtavirta, and T. Kaltiaisenaho, “The serpent monte carlo code: Status, development and applications in 2013,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 82, pp. 142–150, aug 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Paratte, R. Fru¨h, U. Kasemeyer, M. Kalugin, W. Timm, and R. Chawla, “A benchmark on the calculation of kinetic parameters based on reactivity effect experiments in the CROCUS reactor,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 739–748, may 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Ligonnet, A. Laureau, P. Simbsler, A. Pautz, and V. Lamirand, “Design of an open-loop pile-oscillation program in the crocus reactor,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 1001–1009, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  30. T. Mager, O. Pakari, M. Hursin, T. Ligonnet, A. Pautz, and V. Lamirand, “Intra-pin reaction rate measurements in the crocus experimental reactor,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 1047–1055, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. D. Bess, T. Ivanova, I. Hill, and L. Scott, “The 2019 edition of the IRPhEP handbook,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 1565–1568, Nov. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lamirand, Vincent, Laureau, Axel, Pakari, Oskari, Frajtag, Pravel, and Pautz, Andreas, “Power calibration methodology at the crocus reactor,” EPJ Web Conf., vol. 225, p. 04022, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202022504022 [Google Scholar]
  33. O. Pakari, V. Lamirand, G. Perret, P. Frajtag, and A. Pautz, “Kinetic parameter measurements in the crocus reactor using current mode instrumentation,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 2456–2460, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  34. I. C. S. B. E. P. (ICSBEP), International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments. Paris, France: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  35. C. Solomon, M. Krass, A. Garner, and M. Chichester, “Benchmark specifications for godiva i: A highly enriched uranium metal assembly,” Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA, Tech. Rep. LA-14244-M, 2006, accessed: Mar. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ncsp.llnl.gov/sites/ncsp/files/2021-05/LA-14244-M.pdf [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Leppa¨nen, M. Aufiero, E. Fridman, R. Rachamin, and S. van der Marck, “Calculation of effective point kinetics parameters in the serpent 2 monte carlo code,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 65, pp. 272–279, mar 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Saliba, P. Romano, J. Tramm, E. B. Knudsen, D. Siefman, A. Pautz, and O. Pakari, “Development of an event tracking feature in openmc for neutron spectroscopy and scatter camera systems,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2025). American Nuclear Society, 2025, presented at the International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2025), Denver, April 27–30, 2025. Paper #9271. [Google Scholar]
  38. M. Saliba, “Openmc retina feature branch (forked),” 2024, gitHub repository, forked from the OpenMC project. Available at https://github.com/saliba170499/openmcretina/tree/retinafeature. [Google Scholar]
  39. T. Kittelmann, E. Klinkby, E. Knudsen, P. Willendrup, X. Cai, and K. Kanaki, “Monte carlo particle lists: Mcpl,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 218, pp. 17–42, Sep. 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Folk, G. Heber, Q. Koziol, E. Pourmal, and D. Robinson, “An overview of the hdf5 technology suite and its applications,” in Proceedings of the EDBT/ICDT 2011 Workshop on Array Databases, ser. EDBT/ICDT ’11. ACM, Mar. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  41. P. K. Romano, N. E. Stauff, Z. J. Ooi, Y. Miao, A. Lund, and L. Zou, “Watts: Workflow and template toolkit for simulation,” Journal of Open Source Software, vol. 7, no. 79, p. 4735, Nov. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  42. B. Rossi and K. Greisen, “Cosmic-ray theory,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 240–309, oct 1941. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.