EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 338 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 338 (2025) 04025 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 338, 2025
ANIMMA 2025 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 04025
Number of page(s) 8
Section Research Reactors and Particle Accelerators
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202533804025
Published online 06 November 2025
  1. G. Palmiotti, P. Blaise, and F. Mellier, “Massimo Salvatores: integral experiments and their use for the validation of nuclear data and the neutronic design of advanced nuclear systems,” EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, vol. 7, p. 11, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1051/epjn/2021007. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Panizo et al., “Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses for advanced nuclear systems (ALFRED, ASTRID, ESFR and MYRRHA),” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 172, p. 105207, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.PNUCENE.2024.105207. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Kochetkov et al., “Integral experiments in the VENUS-F reactor,” Ann Nucl Energy, vol. 157, p. 108230, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2021.108230. [Google Scholar]
  4. W. K. Foell, Small-sample reactivity measurements in nuclear reactors. 1972. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4351459 [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Grimaldi et al., “The CoRREx neutron spectrum filtering campaign at VENUS-F for calculation-to-experiment discrepancy interpretation,” Ann Nucl Energy, vol. 219, p. 111425, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2025.111425. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Leppänen, V. Valtavirta, A. Rintala, and R. Tuominen, “Status of Serpent Monte Carlo code in 2024,” EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, vol. 11, p. 3, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1051/epjn/2024031. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bell G. and Glasstone S., Nuclear reactor theory. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Liu, X. Lv, W. Zhao, K. Wang, J. Tu, and X. Ouyang, “The comparison of MCNP perturbation technique with MCNP difference method in critical calculation,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 240, no. 8, pp. 2005–2010, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.04.022. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Aufiero et al., “A collision history-based approach to sensitivity/perturbation calculations in the continuous energy Monte Carlo code SERPENT,” Ann Nucl Energy, vol. 85, pp. 245–258, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2015.05.008. [Google Scholar]
  10. X. Peng, J. Liang, A. Alhajri, B. Forget, and K. Smith, “Development of continuous-energy sensitivity analysis capability in OpenMC,” Ann Nucl Energy, vol. 110, pp. 362–383, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2017.06.061. [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Truchet and P. Leconte, “Small sample reactivity worths calculation exact perturbation theory and Monte Carlo transport,” in M&C019, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://hal.science/hal-02411094 [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Aufiero, M. Martin, and M. Fratoni, “XGPT: Extending Monte Carlo Generalized Perturbation Theory capabilities to continuous-energy sensitivity functions,” Ann Nucl Energy, vol. 96, pp. 295–306, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2016.06.012. [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Di Croce, P. Leconte, F. Grimaldi, A. Krása, P.-E. Labeau, and J. Wagemans, “Small Sample Reactivity Worth Calculation: Comparison of Serpent2 and TRIPOLI4 Perturbation Techniques,” in International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2025), Illinois: American Nuclear Society, 2025, pp. 1156–1165. doi: 10.13182/xyz-47168. [Google Scholar]
  14. G. R. Keepin, Physics of Nuclear Kinetics, 1st ed. Addison-Wesley, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Hairer and G. Wanner, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II, vol. 14. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-09947-6. [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Virtanen et al., “SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python,” Nat Methods, vol. 17, pp. 261–272, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hetrick David L, Dynamics of nuclear reactors. Chicago: University of Chicago press, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  18. V. M. Monteiro, Á. Calebe Ribeiro Lima, A. S. Martinez, and A. C. Gonçalves, “A differential equation for inverse point kinetics,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 421, p. 113094, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113094. [Google Scholar]
  19. B. Geslot, C. Jammes, and B. Gall, “Influence of the delayed neutron group parameters on reactivity estimation by rod drop analysis,” Ann Nucl Energy, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 652–660, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2007.03.005. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. dos Santos, “A reactivity meter with uncertainties,” Ann Nucl Energy, vol. 202, p. 110463, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2024.110463. [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Leppänen, M. Aufiero, E. Fridman, R. Rachamin, and S. Van Der Marck, “Calculation of effective point kinetics parameters in the Serpent 2 Monte Carlo code,” Ann Nucl Energy, vol. 65, pp. 272–279, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2013.10.032. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Tanabashi et al., “Review of Particle Physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 98, no. 3, p. 030001, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001. [Google Scholar]
  23. B. Geslot, A. Gruel, P. Walczak, P. Leconte, and P. Blaise, “A hybrid pile oscillator experiment in the Minerve reactor,” Ann Nucl Energy, vol. 108, pp. 268–276, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.04.036. [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Ligonnet, A. Laureau, P. Simsbler, A. Pautz, and V. Lamirand, “Design of an OpenLoop Pile-Oscillation Program in the CROCUS Reactor,” IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, pp. 1–1, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TNS.2024.3371183. [Google Scholar]
  25. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, “Particle Counting in Radioactivity Measurements,” Bethesda, MD, 1994. [Online]. Available: https://www.icru.org/report/particle-counting-in-radioactivity-measurements-report-52/ [Google Scholar]
  26. B. D. Ganapol, “A highly accurate algorithm for the solution of the point kinetics equations,” Ann Nucl Energy, vol. 62, pp. 564–571, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2012.06.007. [Google Scholar]
  27. C. E. Cohn, “A Simplified Theory of Pile Noise,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 472–475, May 1960, doi: 10.13182/NSE60-4. [Google Scholar]
  28. B. Geslot, A. Gruel, S. Bréaud, P. Leconte, and P. Blaise, “Innovative hybrid pile oscillator technique in the Minerve reactor: open loop vs. closed loop,” EPJ Web Conf, vol. 170, p. 04009, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1051/epjconf/201817004009. [Google Scholar]
  29. G. R. Imel, B. Baker, T. Riley, A. Langbehn, H. Aryal, and M. L. Benzerga, “Study of the open loop and closed loop oscillator techniques,” in ANIMMA2015, IEEE, Apr. 2015, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/ANIMMA.2015.7465538. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.