EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 338 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 338 (2025) 06002 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 338, 2025
ANIMMA 2025 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 06002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Nuclear Safeguards, Homeland Security and CBRN
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202533806002
Published online 06 November 2025
  1. G. Gilmore, Practical gamma-ray spectroscopy. John Wiley & Sons, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Liang, P. Gong, X. Tang, P. Wang, L. Gao, Z. Wang, and R. Zhang, “Rapid nuclide identification algorithm based on convolutional neural network,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 133, pp. 483–490, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Daniel, F. Ceraudo, O. Limousin, D. Maier, and A. Meuris, “Automatic and real-time identification of radionuclides in gamma-ray spectra: a new method based on convolutional neural network trained with synthetic data set,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 644–653, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Kim, K. Park, and G. Cho, “Multi-radioisotope identification algorithm using an artificial neural network for plastic gamma spectra,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 147, pp. 83–90, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. B. T. Koo, H. C. Lee, K. Bae, Y. Kim, J. Jung, C. S. Park, H.-S. Kim, and C. H. Min, “Development of a radionuclide identification algorithm based on a convolutional neural network for radiation portal monitoring system,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 180, p. 109300, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. N. Turner, C. Wheldon, T. K. Wheldon, M. R. Gilbert, L. W. Packer, J. Burns, and M. Freer, “Convolutional neural networks for challenges in automated nuclide identification,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 15, p. 5238, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Kim, K. Ko, J. Park, S. Lee, H. Yun, and G. Cho, “Deep learningbased gamma spectroscopic analysis considering multiple variables for in situ applications,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 226, p. 112261, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Kamuda, J. Zhao, and K. Huff, “A comparison of machine learning methods for automated gamma-ray spectroscopy,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 954, p. 161385, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Kamuda, J. Stinnett, and C. Sullivan, “Automated isotope identification algorithm using artificial neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 1858–1864, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Kamuda and C. J. Sullivan, “An automated isotope identification and quantification algorithm for isotope mixtures in low-resolution gammaray spectra,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 155, pp. 281–286, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Xu, J. Bobin, A. de Vismes Ott, and C. Bobin, “Sparse spectral unmixing for activity estimation in γ-ray spectrometry applied to environmental measurements,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 156, p. 108903, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Malfrait, J. Bobin, and A. de Vismes Ott, “Spectral unmixing of multitemporal data in gamma-ray spectrometry,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 1045, p. 167547, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Mano, C. Chapelle, A. D. M. Kabakian, P. Gross, H. Paradis, O. Delaune, and L. Patryl, “Algorithm development for low level radioxenon 2D spectra analysis: A first case of study using spectral unmixing for a β-γ detector,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 203, p. 111079, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Malfrait, J. Bobin, and A. de Vismes Ott, “Online spectral unmixing in gamma-ray spectrometry,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 201, p. 111011, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K. a. Amako, J. Apostolakis, H. Araujo, P. Arce, M. Asai, D. Axen, S. Banerjee, G. Barrand et al., “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit,” Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 506, no. 3, pp. 250–303, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Forster and T. Godfrey, “MCNP-a general Monte Carlo code for neutron and photon transport,” in Monte-Carlo Methods and Applications in Neutronics, Photonics and Statistical Physics: Proceedings of the Joint Los Alamos National Laboratory-Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique Meeting Held at Cadarache Castle, Provence, France April 22–26, 1985. Springer, 2006, pp. 33–55. [Google Scholar]
  17. “American national standard for performance criteria for spectroscopybased portal monitors used in homeland security,” ANSI N42.38-2015 (Revision of ANSI N42.38-2006), pp. 1–59, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. D. T. Phan, J. Bobin, C. Thiam, and C. Bobin, “A hybrid machine learning unmixing method for automatic analysis of γ-spectra with spectral variability,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 1060, p. 169028, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Liaw, E. Liang, R. Nishihara, P. Moritz, J. E. Gonzalez, and I. Stoica, “Tune: A research platform for distributed model selection and training,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.05118, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. R. André, C. Bobin, J. Bobin, J. Xu, and A. de Vismes Ott, “Metrological approach of γ-emitting radionuclides identification at low statistics: application of sparse spectral unmixing to scintillation detectors,” Metrologia, vol. 58, no. 1, p. 015011, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  21. D. T. Phan, J. Bobin, C. Thiam, and C. Bobin, “Automatic identification and quantification of γ-emitting radionuclides with spectral variability using a hybrid machine learning unmixing method,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 232, p. 112654, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. S. Wilks, “The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses,” The annals of mathematical statistics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 60–62, 1938. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.