Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 338, 2025
ANIMMA 2025 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 09009
Number of page(s) 4
Section Environmental and Medical Sciences
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202533809009
Published online 06 November 2025
  1. G. Mariani et al., “Radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant cutaneous melanoma,” J. Nucl. Med., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 811–827, Jun. 2002. [Online]. Available: https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/43/6/811 [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Mariani et al., “Radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery,” J. Nucl. Med., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1198–1215, Aug. 2001. [Online]. Available: https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/42/8/1198 [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Marin et al., “Accuracy and precision assessment for activity quantification in individualized dosimetry of 177Lu-dotatate therapy,” EJNMMI Phys., vol. 4, Dec. 2017, Art. no. 15. doi:10.1186/s40658-017-0174-7 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. L. Farnworth and S. L. Bugby, “Intraoperative gamma cameras: A review of development in the last decade and future outlook,” J. Imaging, vol. 9, May 2023. doi:10.3390/jimaging9050102 [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Tsuchimochi and K. Hayama, “Intraoperative gamma cameras for radioguided surgery: Technical characteristics, performance parameters, and clinical applications,” Phys. Med., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 126–138, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Hellingman and S. Vidal-Sicart, “The Use of Intraoperative Small and Large Field of View Gamma Cameras for Radioguided Surgery,” in Radioguided Surgery, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016, pp. 35–56. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26051-83 [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Soluri et al., “Small field of view, high-resolution, portable gamma-camera for axillary sentinel node detection,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, vol. 569, no. 2, pp. 273–276, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2006.08.027 [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Paredes et al., “Radioguided occult lesion localisation in breast cancer using an intraoperative portable gamma camera: First results,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 230–235, Feb. 2008. doi:10.1007/s00259-007-0640-x [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Arabi, A. S. Saberi Manesh, and H. Zaidi, “Innovations in dedicated PET instrumentation: from the operating room to specimen imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 69, no. 11, 11TR03, 2024. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ad4b92 [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Acerbi et al., “POsition-sensitive SiPMs compact and scalable beta-camera (POSiCS),” Public Deliverable, ATTRACT Final Conference, May 2019. [Online]. Available: https://phase1.attract-eu.com/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/POSiCS.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Acerbi et al., “Compact and handheld SiPM-based gamma camera for radio-guided surgery and medical imaging,” Instruments, vol. 9, no. 2, 2025. doi:10.3390/instruments9020014 [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Gola et al., “A novel approach to position-sensitive silicon photomultipliers: First results,” in Proc. IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Med. Imaging Conf. (NSS/MIC), 2013, pp. 1–4. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:24489596 [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Acerbi, S. Merzi, and A. Gola, “Large area tiles of position-sensitive silicon photomultipliers,” in Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Position Sensitive Detectors (PSD13), Oxford, U.K., Sep. 2023. [Online]. [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Acerbi, S. Merzi, and A. Gola, “Position-sensitive silicon photomultiplier arrays with large-area and sub-millimeter resolution,” Sensors, vol. 24, Jul. 2024. doi:10.3390/s24144507 [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Raiola et al., “Quantitative determination of spatial resolution and linearity of position-sensitive LG-SiPMs at sub-millimeter scale via Ricean distribution fitting,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 1080, 170774, Nov. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2025.170774 [Google Scholar]
  16. Biometech AB, “Fillable mouse phantom for preclinical imaging,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://bioemtech.com/bioemtech-fillablemouse-phantom-in-the-journal-of-nuclear-medicine-jnm/ [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.