Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 339, 2025
12th International Conference on Hard and Electromagnetic Probes of High-Energy Nuclear Collisions (Hard Probes 2024)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 8
Section Plenary Talk
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202533901004
Published online 05 November 2025
  1. S. Shalev-Shwartz, S. Ben-David, Understanding Machine Learning - From Theory to Algorithms. (Cambridge University Press, 2014), ISBN 978-1-10-705713-5 [Google Scholar]
  2. J.W. Harris, B. Müller, ”QGP Signatures” Revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 247 (2024), 2308.05743. 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12533-y [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Duarte et al., Fast inference of deep neural networks in FPGAs for particle physics, JINST 13, P07027 (2018), 1804.06913. 10.1088/1748-0221/13/07/P07027 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. FastML Team, fastmachinelearning/hls4ml (2023), https://github.com/fastmachinelearning/hls4ml [Google Scholar]
  5. Tech. rep., CERN, Geneva (2020), final version, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2714892 [Google Scholar]
  6. C. ATLAS, Tech. rep., CERN, Geneva (2022), https://cds.cern.ch/record/2802799 [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Kvapil et al., Intelligent experiments through real-time AI: Fast Data Processing and Autonomous Detector Control for sPHENIX and future EIC detectors, PoS ICHEP2024, 1033 (2025), 2 501.04845. 10.22323/1.476.1033 [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Huang, Y. Ren, S. Yoo, J. Huang, Fast 2D Bicephalous Convolutional Autoencoder for Compressing 3D Time Projection Chamber Data, in International Conference on High Performance Computing, Network, Storage, and Analysis (2023), 2310.15026 [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Coadou, Boosted decision trees (2022), 2206.09645. 10.1142/9789811234033_0002 [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Chen, C. Guestrin, Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, in Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (2016), pp. 785–794 [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Constraining hadronization mechanisms with Λc+/D0 production ratios in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 839, 137796 (2023), 2112.08156. 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137796 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Measurement of beauty and charm production in pp collisions at s[s = 5.02 TeV via non-prompt and prompt D mesons, JHEP 05, 220 (2021), 2102.13601. 10.1007/jhep05(2021)220 [Google Scholar]
  13. A.M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Nuclear modification factor of D0 mesons in PbPb collisions at √snn = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 782, 474 (2018), 1708.04962. 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.05.074 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS), Bottom quark energy loss and hadronization with B+ and B0 nuclear modification factors using pp and PbPb collisions at √snn = 5.02 TeV, JHEP 02, 195 (2025), 2409.07258. 10.1007/jhep02(2025)195 [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Adam et al. (STAR), First measurement of Λc baryon production in Au+Au collisions at √SNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 172301 (2020), 1910.14628. 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.124.172301 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. M.S. Abdallah et al. (STAR), Evidence of Mass Ordering of Charm and Bottom Quark Energy Loss in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1150 (2022), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 83, 455 (2023)], 2111.14615. 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-11003-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Wang (STAR), Beam energy and system size dependence of heavy flavor production at STAR, EPJ Web Conf. 296, 09004 (2024). 10.1051/epjconf/202429609004 [Google Scholar]
  18. Tech. rep., CERN, Geneva (2024), https://cds.cern.ch/record/2909071 [Google Scholar]
  19. Tech. rep., CERN, Geneva (2022), all figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PUBNOTES/ATL-PHYS-PUB-2022-027, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2811135 [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Measurement of the radius dependence of charged-particle jet suppression in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys. Lett. B 849, 138412 (2024), 2303.00592. 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138412 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Haake, C. Loizides, Machine Learning based jet momentum reconstruction in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C, 99, 064904 (2019), 1810.06 3 2 4. 10.1103/Phys- RevC.99.064904 [Google Scholar]
  22. Y.L. Du, D. Pablos, K. Tywoniuk, Deep learning jet modifications in heavy-ion collisions, JHEP, 21, 206 (2020), 2012.07797. 10.1007/jhep03(2021)206 [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Mengel, P. Steffanic, C. Hughes, A.C.O. da Silva, C. Nattrass, Interpretable machine learning methods applied to jet background subtraction in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C, 108, L021901 (2023), 2303.08275. 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.L021901 [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Torbunov, Y. Huang, H. Yu, J. Huang, S. Yoo, M. Lin, B. Viren, Y. Ren, Uvcgan: Unet vision transformer cycle-consistent gan for unpaired image-to-image translation (2022), 2203.02557, https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02557 [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Andreassen, P.T. Komiske, E.M. Metodiev, B. Nachman, J. Thaler, OmniFold: A Method to Simultaneously Unfold All Observables, Phys. Rev. Lett., 124, 182001 (2020), 1911.09107. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.182001 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. V. Andreev et al. (H1), Measurement of Lepton-Jet Correlation in Deep-Inelastic Scattering with the H1 Detector Using Machine Learning for Unfolding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 132002 (2022), 2108.12376. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.132002 [Google Scholar]
  27. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Simultaneous Unbinned Differential Cross-Section Measurement of Twenty-Four Z+jets Kinematic Observables with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 261803 (2024), 2405.20041. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.261803 [Google Scholar]
  28. Y. Song (STAR), Measurement of CollinearDrop jet mass and its correlation with Soft- Drop groomed jet substructure observables in s/s = 200 GeV pp collisions by STAR (2023), 2307.07718. [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Pani (STAR), Generalized angularities measurements from STAR at √SNN = 200 GeV, EPJ WebConf. 296, 11003 (2024), 2403.13921. 10.1051/epjconf/202429611003 [Google Scholar]
  30. Y.S. Lai, D. Neill, M. Płoskon´, F. Ringer, Explainable machine learning of the underlying physics of high-energy particle collisions, Phys. Lett. B, 829, 137055 (2022), 2012.06582.10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137055 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.