Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 339, 2025
12th International Conference on Hard and Electromagnetic Probes of High-Energy Nuclear Collisions (Hard Probes 2024)
Article Number 02009
Number of page(s) 5
Section Contributed Talk: Jet Modification and Medium Response
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202533902009
Published online 05 November 2025
  1. M. Connors, C. Nattrass, R. Reed, S. Salur, Jet measurements in heavy ion physics, Rev. Mod. Phys., 90, 025005 (2018), 170 5.01974. 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.025005 [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Vitev, M. Gyulassy, High pτ tomography of d + Au and Au+Au at SPS, RHIC, and LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 252301 (2002), hep-ph/0209161. 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.89.252301 [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Noronha-Hostler, B. Betz, J. Noronha, M. Gyulassy, Event-by-event hydrodynamics + jet energy loss: A solution to the RAAΘv2 puzzle, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 252301 (2016), 1602.03788. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.252301 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Molnar, D. Sun, High-pT suppression and elliptic flow from radiative energy loss with realistic bulk medium expansion (2013), 1305.1046. [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Zhao, W. Ke, W. Chen, T. Luo, X.N. Wang, From Hydrodynamics to Jet Quenching, Coalescence, and Hadron Cascade: A Coupled Approach to Solving the RAA8v2 Puzzle, Phys. Rev. Lett., 128, 022302 (2022), 2103.14657. 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.128.022302 [Google Scholar]
  6. X. Zhang, J. Liao, Jet Quenching and Its Azimuthal Anisotropy in AA and possibly High Multiplicity pA and dA Collisions (2013), 1311.5463. [Google Scholar]
  7. B.Z. Kopeliovich, J. Nemchik, I.K. Potashnikova, I. Schmidt, Quenching of high- pT hadrons: Energy Loss vs Color Transparency, Phys. Rev. C, 86, 054904 (2012), 1208.4951. 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.054904 [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Andres, N. Armesto, H. Niemi, R. Paatelainen, C.A. Salgado, Jet quenching as a probe of the initial stages in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B, 803, 135318 (2020), 1902.03231. 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135318 [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS), Overview of high-density QCD studies with the CMS experiment at the LHC (2024), 2405.10785. [Google Scholar]
  10. A.V. Sadofyev, M.D. Sievert, I. Vitev, Ab Initio Coupling of Jets to Collective Flow in the Opacity Expansion Approach (2021), 2104.09513. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Bahder, H. Rahman, M.D. Sievert, I. Vitev, Signatures of Jet Drift in QGP Hard Probe Observables (2024), 2412.05474. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Luzum, J.Y. Ollitrault, Eliminating experimental bias in anisotropic-flow measurements of high-energy nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C, 87, 044907 (2013), 1209.2323. 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.044907 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A.M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Azimuthal anisotropy of charged particles with transverse momentum up to 100 GeV/ c in PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 776, 195 (2018), 1702.00630. 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.041 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. V. Greco, C.M. Ko, P. Levai, Parton coalescence and anti-proton / pion anomaly at RHIC, Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, 202302 (2003), nucl-th/0301093. 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.90.202302 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.