Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 342, 2025
14th International Spring Seminar on Nuclear Physics “Cutting-Edge Developments in Nuclear Structure Physics”
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534201001
Published online 21 November 2025
  1. A. Taninah, A.V. Afanasjev, Anchor-based optimization of energy density functionals, Phys. Rev. C 107, L041301 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Kortelainen, J. McDonnell, W. Nazarewicz, E. Olsen, P.G. Reinhard, J. Sarich, N. Schunck, S.M. Wild, D. Davesne, J. Erler et al., Nuclear energy density optimization: Shell structure, Phys. Rev. C 89, 054314 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Li, E.F. Zhou, J.M. Yao, Benchmarking dynamical correlation energies in odd-mass chromium isotopes, Phys. Rev. C 112, 014317 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Möller, J.R. Nix, W.D. Myers, W.J. Swiatecki, Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 59, 185 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Goriely, M. Samyn, P.H. Heenen, J.M. Pearson, F. Tondeur, Hartree-fock mass formulas and extrapolation to new mass data, Phys. Rev. C 66, 024326 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Taninah, B. Osei, A.V. Afanasjev, U.C. Perera, S. Teeti, Toward accurate nuclear mass tables in covariant density functional theory, Phys. Rev. C 109, 024321 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Osei, A.V. Afanasjev, A. Taninah, A. Dalbah, U.C. Perera, V.A. Dzuba, V.V. Flambaum, Further steps toward the next generation of covariant energy density functionals, Phys. Rev. C 112, 044304 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Osei, A.V. Afanasjev, A. Dalbah, Global optimization of harmonic oscillator basis in covariant density functional theory, submitted to Phys. Rev. C, see also nuclear theory archieve arXiv:2508.06698 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Pena-Arteaga, S. Goriely, N. Chamel, Relativistic mean-field mass models, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 320 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Zhang, M.K. Cheoun, Y.B. Choi, P.S. Chong, J. Dong, Z. Dong, X. Du, L. Geng, E. Ha, X.T. He et al., Nuclear mass table in deformed relativistic hartree-bogoliubov theory in continuum, i: Even-even nuclei., At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 144, 101488 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Wang, W.J. Huang, F.G. Kondev, G. Audi, S. Naimi, The ame2020 atomic mass evaluation. (ii) tables, graphs and references, Chin. Phys. C45, 030003 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  12. V.A. Dzuba, V.V. Flambaum, A.V. Afanasjev, Calculation of the correction, relativistic and qed corrections to the total electron binding energy in atoms and their nuclear charge dependence, Phys. Rev. A 110, 052810 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  13. S.E. Agbemava, A.V. Afanasjev, D. Ray, P. Ring, Global performance of covariant energy density functionals: Ground state observables of even-even nuclei and the estimate of theoretical uncertainties, Phys. Rev. C 89, 054320 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Q.S. Zhang, Z.M. Niu, Z.P. Li, J.M. Yao, J. Meng, Global dynamical correlation energies in covariant density functional theory: cranking approximation, Frontiers of Physics 9, 529 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  15. K.Q. Lu, Z.X. Li, Z.P. Li, J.M. Yao, J. Meng, Global study of beyond-mean-field correlation energies in covariant energy density functional theory using a collective hamilto-nian method, Phys. Rev. C 91, 027304 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  16. Y.L. Yang, Y.K. Wang, P.W. Zhao, Z.P. Li, Nuclear landscape in a mapped collective hamiltonian from covariant density functional theory, Phys. Rev. C 104, 054312 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  17. P.W. Zhao, Z.P. Li, J.M. Yao, J. Meng, New parametrization for the nuclear covariant energy density functional with a point-coupling interaction, Phys. Rev. C 82, 054319 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  18. R.N. Perez, N. Schunck, Controlling extrapolations of nuclear properties with feature selection, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137336 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. W. Satula, D.J. Dean, J. Gary, S. Mizutori, W. Nazarewicz, On the origin of the wigner energy, Phys. Lett. B 407, 103 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Neergard, Pairing theory of the symmetry energy, Phys. Rev. C 80, 044313 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Bentley, S. Frauendorf, Relation between wigner energy and proton-neutron pairing, Phys. Rev. C 88, 014322 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Frauendorf, A. Macchiavelli, Proton-neutron pairing, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 78, 24 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Taninah, S.E. Agbemava, A.V. Afanasjev, Covariant density functional theory input for r-process simulations in actinides and superheavy nuclei: The ground state and fission properties, Phys. Rev. C 102, 054330 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. U.C. Perera, A.V. Afanasjev, P. Ring, Charge radii in covariant density functional theory: A global view, Phys. Rev. C 104, 064313 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. W. Long, H. Sagawa, N.V. Giai, J. Meng, Shell structure and p-tensor correlations in density dependent relativistic hartree-fock theory, Phys. Rev. C 76, 034314 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  26. Q. Zhao, Z. Ren, P. Zhao, J. Meng, Covariant density functional theory with localized exchange terms, Phys. Rev. C 106, 034315 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  27. E.V. Litvinova, A.V. Afanasjev, Dynamics of nuclear single-particle structure in covari-ant theory of particle-vibration coupling: From light to superheavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 84, 014305 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. F. Mercier, J.P. Ebran, E. Khan, Covariant energy density functionals with and without tensor coupling at the hartree-bogoliubov level, Phys. Rev. C 107, 034309 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Salinas, J. Piekarewicz, Impact of tensor couplings with scalar mixing on covariant energy density functionals, Phys. Rev. C 109, 045807 (2024). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. X. Roca-Maza, X. Vinas, M. Centelles, P. Ring, P. Schuck, Relativistic mean-field interaction with density-dependent meson-nucleon vertices based on microscopical calculations, Phys. Rev. C 84, 054309 (2011). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.