Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 342, 2025
14th International Spring Seminar on Nuclear Physics “Cutting-Edge Developments in Nuclear Structure Physics”
Article Number 01028
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534201028
Published online 21 November 2025
  1. N. Paar, P. Ring, T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, Quasiparticle random phase approximation based on the relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov model, Phys. Rev. C 67, 034312 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevC.67.034312 [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Paar, T. NiksiC, D. Vretenar, P. Ring, Quasiparticle random phase approximation based on the relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov model. II. Nuclear spin and isospin excitations, Phys. Rev. C 69, 054303 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevC.69.054303 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. E.V. Litvinova, A.V. Afanasjev, Dynamics of nuclear single-particle structure in covariant theory of particle-vibration coupling: From light to superheavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 84, 014305 (2011). 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.014305 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Y.F. Niu, G. Cole, M. Brenna, P.F. Bortignon, J. Meng, Gamow-Teller response within Skyrme random-phase approximation plus particle-vibration coupling, Phys. Rev. C 85, 034314 (2012). 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.034314 [Google Scholar]
  5. Y.F. Niu, Z.M. Niu, G. Cole, E. Vigezzi, Particle-vibration coupling effect on the ß decay of magic nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 142501 (2015). 10.1103/Phys-RevLett.114.142501 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Knapp, P. Papakonstantinou, P. Vesely, G. De Gregorio, J. Herko, N. Lo Iudice, Comparative analysis of formalisms and performances of three different beyond-mean-field approaches, Phys. Rev. C 107, 014305 (2023). 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.014305 [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Vesely, D. Denisova, F. Knapp, F. Simkovic, Double-beta Decay of 48Ca within Second Tamm-Dancoff Approximation, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 18, 2 (2025). 10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.18.2-A9 [Google Scholar]
  8. V.G. Soloviev, Theory of Atomic Nuclei: Quasiparticles and Phonons, 1st edn. (CRC Press, 1992), https://doi.org/1S.12S1/9781SS3S62868 [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Tsoneva, H. Lenske, C. Stoyanov, Probing the nuclear neutron skin by low-energy dipole modes, Physics Letters B 586, 213 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.02.024 [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Tsoneva, H. Lenske, Pygmy dipole resonances in the tin region, Phys. Rev. C 77, 024321 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.024321 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. G. De Gregorio, F. Knapp, N. Lo Iudice, P. Vesely, Self-consistent quasiparticle formulation of a multiphonon method and its application to the neutron-rich 20O nucleus, Phys. Rev. C 93, 044314 (2016). 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044314 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. G. De Gregorio, F. Knapp, N. Lo Iudice, P. Vesely, Microscopic multiphonon approach to spectroscopy in the neutron-rich oxygen region, Phys. Rev. C 97, 034311 (2018). 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034311 [Google Scholar]
  13. G. De Gregorio, F. Knapp, N. Lo Iudice, P. Vesely, Removal of the center of mass in nuclei and its effects on 4He, Physics Letters B 821, 136636 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136636 [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Paar, D. Vretenar, E. Khan, G. Cole, Exotic modes of excitation in atomic nuclei far from stability, Reports on Progress in Physics 70, R02 (2007). 10.1088/0034-4885/70/5/R02 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Litvinova, P. Ring, V. Tselyaev, Mode coupling and the pygmy dipole resonance in a relativistic two-phonon model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 022502 (2010). 10.1103/Phys-RevLett.105.022502 [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Colö, P.F. Bortignon, QRPA plus phonon coupling model and the photoabsorption cross section for 18 20 22O, Nuclear Physics A 696, 427 (2001). 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01217-9 [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Vale, N. Paar, Subtracted second Tamm-Dancoff approximation in the relativistic point-coupling model, Phys. Rev. C 112, 034327 (2025). 10.1103/t1db-h3nb [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, P. Ring, Relativistic nuclear energy density functionals: Adjusting parameters to binding energies, Phys. Rev. C 78, 034318 (2008). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.78.034318 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Kruzic, T. Oishi, D. Vale, N. Paar, Magnetic dipole excitations based on the relativistic nuclear energy density functional, Phys. Rev. C 102, 044315 (2020). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.102.044315 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Vale, Y.F. Niu, N. Paar, Nuclear charge-exchange excitations based on a rela-tivistic density-dependent point-coupling model, Phys. Rev. C 103, 064307 (2021). 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.064307 [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Gambacurta, M. Grasso, J. Engel, Subtraction method in the second random-phase approximation: First applications with a Skyrme energy functional, Phys. Rev. C 92, 034303 (2015). 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034303 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Papakonstantinou, R. Roth, Large-scale second random-phase approximation calculations with finite-range interactions, Phys. Rev. C 81, 024317 (2010). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.81.024317 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Y.W. Lui, H.L. Clark, D.H. Youngblood, Giant resonances in 16O, Phys. Rev. C 64, 064308 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevC.64.064308 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Youngblood, Y.W. Lui, H. Clark, Isoscalar E0, E1, and E2 strength in 40Ca, Phys. Rev. C 63, 067301 (2001), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. C 64 (2001) 049901]. 10.1103/Phys-RevC.63.067301 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.