EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 343 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 343 (2025) 04002 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2025
1st International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering (AIMACE-2025)
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 13
Section Renewable Energy & Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534304002
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. R. Agarwal, K. Verma, N.K. Agrawal, R.K. Duchaniya, and R. Singh, "Synthesis, characterization, thermal conductivity and sensitivity of CuO nanofluids," Applied Thermal Engineering, 102, 1024–1036, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.051 [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Aghanajafi, D. Toghraie, and B. Mehmandoust, "Numerical simulation of laminar forced convection of water-CuO nanofluid inside a triangular duct," Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 85, 103–108, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2016.08.022 [Google Scholar]
  3. N.A. Usri, W.H. Azmi, R. Mamat, K.A. Hamid, and G. Najafi, "Thermal conductivity enhancement of Al2O3 nanofluid in ethylene glycol and water mixture," Energy Procedia, 79, 397–402, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.509 [Google Scholar]
  4. M.F. Zawrah, R.M. Khattab, L.G. Girgis, H. El Daidamony, and R.E. Abdel Aziz, "Stability and electrical conductivity of water-base Al2O3 nanofluids for different applications," HBRC journal, 12 (3), 227–234, 2016. https://doi.org/10.10167j.hbrcj.2014.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. S.Y. Jung, and H. Park, "Experimental investigation of heat transfer of ALO3 nanofluid in a microchannel heat sink," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 179, 121729, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121729 [Google Scholar]
  6. R.R. Sahoo, and V. Kumar, "Development of a new correlation to determine the viscosity of ternary hybrid nanofluid," International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 111, 104451, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2019.104451 [Google Scholar]
  7. M.H. Esfe, M.K. Amiri, and A. Alirezaie, "Thermal conductivity of a hybrid nanofluid" Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 134 (2), 1113–1122, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6836-9 [Google Scholar]
  8. R.R. Sahoo, "Experimental study on the viscosity of hybrid nanofluid and development of a new correlation," Heat and Mass Transfer, 56, 3023–3033, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-020-02915-9 [Google Scholar]
  9. O.A. Hussein, K. Habib, A.S. Muhsan, R. Saidur, O.A. Alawi, and T.K. Ibrahim, "Thermal performance enhancement of a flat plate solar collector using hybrid nanofluid," Solar Energy, 204, 208–222, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.04.034 [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Ekiciler, K. Arslan, O. Turgut, and B. Kursun, "Effect of hybrid nanofluid on heat transfer performance of parabolic trough solar collector receiver," Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 143, 1637–1654, 2021. 10.1007/s10973-020-09717-5 [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Kazemian, T. Salari, H. Ma, and Lu, "Application of hybrid nanofluids in a novel combined photovoltaic/thermal and solar collector system," Solar Energy, 239, 102–116, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.04.016 [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Gangadevi, and B.K. Vinayagam, "Experimental determination of thermal conductivity and viscosity of different nanofluids and its effect on a hybrid solar collector," Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 136, 199–209, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7840-4 [Google Scholar]
  13. J.R.S.C. Mateo, "Multi criteria analysis in the renewable energy industry" Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2346-0 [Google Scholar]
  14. C.L. Hwang, and K. Yoon, K, "Multiple attribute decision making: a state of the art survey," Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, 186, 58–191, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Chodha, R. Dubey, R. Kumar, S. Singh, and S. Kaur, "Selection of industrial arc welding robot with TOPSIS and Entropy MCDM techniques," Materials Today: Proceedings, 50, 709–715, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.487 [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Xu, Y. Ke, Y. Li, H. Chu, and Y. Wu, "Data-driven configuration optimization of an off-grid wind/PV/hydrogen system based on modified NSGA-II and CRITIC-TOPSIS," Energy Conversion and Management, 215, 112892, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112892 [Google Scholar]
  17. M.A. Nazari, A. Aslani, and R. Ghasempour, "Analysis of solar farm site selection based on TOPSIS approach," International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 9 (1), 12–25, 2018. DOI: 10.4018/IJSESD.2018010102 [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Podder, A. Biswas, and S. Saha, "Multi-objective optimization of a small sized solar PV-T water collector using controlled elitist NSGA-II coupled with TOPSIS," Solar Energy, 230, 688–702, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.10.078 [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Hamurcu, M. and T. Eren, "Applications of the MOORA and TOPSIS methods for decision of electric vehicles in public transportation technology," Transport, 37 (4), 251–263, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2022.17783 [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Khorshidi, B. Erkayman, Ö. Albayrak, R. Kiliç, and H.I. Demir, Hi, "Solar power plant location selection using integrated fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy MOORA method," International Journal of Ambient Energy, 43 (1), 7400–7409, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2022.2068067 [Google Scholar]
  21. W.O. Sarkodie, E.A. Ofosu, and B.C. Ampimah, Decision optimization techniques for evaluating renewable energy resources for power generation in Ghana: MCDM approach, Energy Reports, 8, 3504–13513, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.120 [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Rajendiran, G, V.B. Kuppusamy, and S. Shanmugasundaram, Experimental investigation of the effects of sonication time and volume concentration on the performance of PVT solar collector, IET Renewable Power Generation, 12(12), 1375–1381, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.5283 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.