EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 343 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 343 (2025) 05010 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2025
1st International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering (AIMACE-2025)
Article Number 05010
Number of page(s) 15
Section Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning in Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534305010
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. Hewish, A., Bell, S. J., Pilkington, J. D. H., Scott, P. F., & Collins, R. A. (1968). Observation of a rapidly pulsating radio source. Nature, 217, 709–713. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Rustam et al., "Predicting pulsar stars using a random tree boosting voting classifier (RTB-VC)," Astronomy and Computing, vol. 32, p. 100404, (Jul. 2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2020.100404. [Google Scholar]
  3. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhu, W. W., Zhang, L., & Wang, P. (2019). Pulsar candidate classification based on convolutional neural networks. The Astrophysical Journal, 881(1), 20. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321–357. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keane, E. F., Bhattacharyya, B., Flynn, C., & Kramer, M. (2015). The future of pulsar astronomy with the Square Kilometre Array. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 291, 249–253. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Sadhu, "Pulsar Star Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Classification Algorithms using SMOTE," International Journal of Computer and Information Technology(2279-0764), vol. 11, no. 1, Mar. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.24203/ijcit.v11i1.193 [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Mounika, P. Siva Spandana, M. Anuja, N. Krishna, S. Prada, and U. Scholar, "DETECTION OF PULSAR STARS USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS," (Jun. 2020). [Google Scholar]
  9. R. J. Lyon, B. W. Stappers, S. Cooper, J. M. Brooke, and J. D. Knowles, "Fifty years of pulsar candidate selection: from simple filters to a new principled real-time classification approach," Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 459, no. 1, pp. 1104–1123, Apr. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw656. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Ylnner, V. Sanchez, D. Carolina, Saire, Josimar Edinson Chire, and P. B. Franco, "Machine Learning Pipeline for Pulsar Star Dataset," arXiv.org, (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.01208 [Google Scholar]
  11. José-Luis Solorio-Ramirez, Raúl Jiménez-Cruz, Yenny Villuendas-Rey, and Cornelio Yáñez-Márquez, "Random forest Algorithm for the Classification of Spectral Data of Astronomical Objects," Algorithms, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 293–293, Jun. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/a16060293 [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Pathak, S. J. Quraishi, A. Singh, M. Singh, K. Arora and D. Ather, "A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models: SVM, Naïve Bayes, Random Forest, and LSTM in Predictive Analytics," 2023 3rd International Conference on Technological Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICTACS), Tashkent, Uzbekistan, (2023), pp. 790–795, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTACS59847.2023.10390255 [Google Scholar]
  13. N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, "SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique," Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 16, pp. 321–357, (Jun. 2002), doi: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Ambarwari, Q. Jafar Adrian, and Y. Herdiyeni, "Analysis of the Effect of Data Scaling on the Performance of the Machine Learning Algorithm for Plant Identification," Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 117–122, (Feb. 2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v4i1.1517 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ankhita Ravishankar Sathanur, "Random Forest Identification of Pulsars," International journal of high school research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 14–22, (Aug. 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.36838/v5i4.3. [Google Scholar]
  16. Akshay Gole, Sankalp Singh, Prathmesh Kanherkar, P.R. Abhishek, and Prof . Pallavi Wankhede, "Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms : Random Forest algorithm, Naive Bayes Classifier and KNN - A survey", JRPS, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 194–197, (Apr. 2022). [Google Scholar]
  17. J. R. Song, "The effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms in classifying pulsar stars and the impact of data preparation," Journal of Physics Conference Series, vol. 2428, no. 1, pp. 012046–012046, (Feb. 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2428/1/012046. [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Lee, F. Rustam, W. Aljedaani, A. Ishaq, V. Rupapara, and I. Ashraf, "Predicting Pulsars from Imbalanced Dataset with Hybrid Resampling Approach," Advances in Astronomy, vol. 2021, pp. 1–13, (Dec. 2021), doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4916494. [Google Scholar]
  19. Juie Shetye, E. Verwichte, M. Stangalini, and J. G. Doyle, "Chandra Observations of Candidate Sub-Parsec Binary Supermassive Black Holes," The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 866:144 (5pp), (Jan. 2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357. [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Holewik and G. Schaefer, "Ensemble Classifiers for Pulsar Detection," Emergence, Complexity and Computation, pp. 153–166, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65867-0 7. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. A. B. Mahmoud and P. Guo, "Learning from unbalanced pulsar data by combine DCGAN and PILAE algorithm," New Astronomy, vol. 85, pp. 101561–101561, (Dec. 2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j .newast.2020.101561. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Bethapudi and S. Desai, "Separation of pulsar signals from noise using supervised machine learning algorithms," Astronomy and Computing, vol. 23, pp. 15–26, (Apr. 2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2018.02.002. [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Biau and E. Scornet, "A Random Forest Guided Tour," TEST, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 197–227, (Apr. 2016), doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-016-0481 -7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Deepanshu Beniwal, A. Roy, H. Yadav, and A. Chauhan, "Detection of Pulsars by Classical Machine Learning Algorithms," 2021 2nd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), pp. 1–7, (May 2021), doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/INCET51464.2021.9456250. [Google Scholar]
  25. Z.-X. Liang and Y. Liang, "Magnetic-field oscillation model of pulsar radio emission: prediction of an observable effect," Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 530, no. 1, pp. 203–209, (Mar. 2024), doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae909. [Google Scholar]
  26. C. J. Zhang, Z. H. Shang, W. M. Chen, L. Xie, and X. H. Miao, "A Review of Research on Pulsar Candidate Recognition Based on Machine Learning," Procedia Computer Science, vol. 166, pp. 534–538, (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.050. [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Lin, X. Li, and Z. Luo, "Pulsars detection by machine learning with very few features," Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 493, no. 2, pp. 1842–1854, (Jan. 2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa218. [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Thanu and D. V. Subha, "Emerging Trends In Pulsar Star Studies: A Synthesis Of Machine Learning Techniques In Pulsar Star Research," Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, (Feb. 2022), doi: https://doi.org/10.15439/2023r66. [Google Scholar]
  29. V Priyanka, B.S. Anil, and B.R. Dinakar, "A Comparative Study of Binary Classification Methods for Pulsar Detection," 2017 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Communication, Computer, and Optimization Techniques (ICEECCOT), (Dec. 2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/iceeccot43722.2018.9001517. [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Seth, A. Monga, U. Yadav, and A. S. Rao, "Finding Accuracies of Various Machine Learning Algorithms by Classification of Pulsar Stars," Lecture notes in mechanical engineering, pp. 51–59, (Jan. 2021), doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8542-5 5. [Google Scholar]
  31. D. Petrusevich, "INVESTIGATION OF PULSAR STARS ASTRONOMICAL DATASET BY MEANS OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS," SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings, vol. 20, pp. 199–206, (Sep. 2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2020/2.1/s07.026. [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Wolfson et al., "A Naive Bayes machine learning approach to risk prediction using censored, time-to-event data," Statistics in Medicine, vol. 34, no. 21, pp. 2941–2957, (May 2015), doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6526. [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Patle and D. S. Chouhan, "SVM kernel functions for classification," IEEE Xplore, (Jan. 01, 2013). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6524743 [Google Scholar]
  34. gulsahdemiryurek, "Pulsar Star Classification," Kaggle.com, (Apr. 14, 2019). https://www.kaggle.com/code/gulsahdemiryurek/pulsar-star-classification. [Google Scholar]
  35. prashantlll, "SVM Classifier Tutorial," Kaggle.com, (Mar. 13, 2020). https://www.kaggle.com/code/prashant111/svm-classifier-tutorial#3.1-Linear-kernel [Google Scholar]
  36. P. Guo et al., "Pulsar candidate classification using generative adversary networks," Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 490, no. 4, pp. 5424–5439, (Oct. 2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2975. [Google Scholar]
  37. R. Lyon. "HTRU2," UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.24432/C5DK6R. [Google Scholar]
  38. Manchester, R. N., Lyne, A. G., Camilo, F., Bell, J. F., Kaspi, V. M., D'Amico, N., … & Crawford, F. (2001). The Parkes multibeam pulsar survey-I. Observing and data analysis systems, discovery and timing of 100 pulsars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 328(1), 17–35. [Google Scholar]
  39. Keith, M. J., Jameson, A., van Straten, W., Bailes, M., Johnston, S., Kramer, M., … & Levin, L. (2010). The High Time Resolution Universe Pulsar Survey-I. System configuration and initial discoveries. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 409(2), 619–627. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lorimer, D. R., & Kramer, M. (2012). Handbook of pulsar astronomy. Cambridge University Press [Google Scholar]
  41. Bates, S. D., Lorimer, D. R., & Rane, A. (2012). The application of artificial intelligence techniques to pulsar candidate selection. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 427(2), 1052–1062. [Google Scholar]
  42. Morello, V., Barr, E. D., Bailes, M., Flynn, C., Keane, E. F., van Straten, W., & Caleb, M. (2014). SPINN: A straight-forward machine learning method for pulsar candidate selection. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 443(2), 1651–1662. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lyon, R. J., Brooke, J. M., Knowles, J. D., Stappers, B. W., & Lyon, R. J. (2016). Pulsar candidate classification using machine learning. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 459(1), 1104–1123. [Google Scholar]
  44. C. Fleizach and S. Fukushima, "A naive Bayes classifier on 1998 KDD Cup." Available: https://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~cfleizac/cse250b/project1.pdf [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.