EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 343 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 343 (2025) 05016 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2025
1st International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering (AIMACE-2025)
Article Number 05016
Number of page(s) 10
Section Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning in Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534305016
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. K. Khosravi, M. Panahi, A. Golkarian, S.D. Keesstra, P.M. Saco, D.T. Bui, S. Lee, Convolutional neural network approach for spatial prediction of flood hazard at national scale of Iran, J Hydrol (Amst) 591 (2020) 125552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125552. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Talukdar, B. Ghose, Shahfahad, R. Salam, S. Mahato, Q.B. Pham, N.T.T. Linh, R. Costache, M. Avand, Flood susceptibility modeling in Teesta River basin, Bangladesh using novel ensembles of bagging algorithms, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 34 (2020) 2277–2300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01862-5. [Google Scholar]
  3. B.P. Mishra, D.K. Ghose, D.P. Satapathy, Geospatial modeling using hybrid machine learning approach for flood susceptibility, Earth Sci Inform 15 (2022) 2619–2636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-022-00872-x. [Google Scholar]
  4. D.P. Satapathy, B.P. Mishra, Flood susceptibility modeling by integrating tree-based regression with metaheuristic algorithm: BWO, Transactions in GIS (2024). https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13171. [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Wang, Z. Fang, H. Hong, L. Peng, Flood susceptibility mapping using convolutional neural network frameworks, J Hydrol (Amst) 582 (2020) 124482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124482. [Google Scholar]
  6. V. Shivhare, A. Kumar, R. Kumar, S. Shashtri, J. Mallick, C.K. Singh, Flood susceptibility and flood frequency modeling for lower Kosi Basin, India using AHP and Sentinel-1 SAR data in geospatial environment, Natural Hazards (2024) 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06614-0. [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Wang, C. Lai, X. Chen, B. Yang, S. Zhao, X. Bai, Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest, J Hydrol (Amst) 527 (2015) 1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.008. [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Costache, L. Zaharia, Flash-flood potential assessment and mapping by integrating the weights-of-evidence and frequency ratio statistical methods in GIS environment - case study: Bâsca Chiojdului River catchment (Romania), Journal of Earth System Science 126 (2017) 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0828-9. [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Madhuri, S. Sistla, K. Srinivasa Raju, Application of machine learning algorithms for flood susceptibility assessment and risk management, Journal of Water and Climate Change 12 (2021) 2608–2623. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2021.051. [Google Scholar]
  10. S.V. Razavi-Termeh, A. Pourzangbar, A. Sadeghi-Niaraki, M.J. Franca, S.-M. Choi, Metaheuristic-driven enhancement of categorical boosting algorithm for flood-prone areas mapping, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 136 (2025) 104357. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjag.2025.104357. [Google Scholar]
  11. B.A. El-Haddad, A.M. Youssef, A.M. Mahdi, Z. Karimi, H.R. Pourghasemi, National flood susceptibility mapping in Saudi Arabia, Earth Sci Inform 18 (2025) 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01510-4. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Saravanan, D. Abijith, Flood susceptibility mapping of Northeast coastal districts of Tamil Nadu India using Multi-source Geospatial data and Machine Learning techniques, Geocarto Int 37 (2022) 15252–15281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2096702. [Google Scholar]
  13. A.R.M. Towfiqul Islam, S. Talukdar, S. Mahato, S. Kundu, K.U. Eibek, Q.B. Pham, A. Kuriqi, N.T.T. Linh, Flood susceptibility modelling using advanced ensemble machine learning models, Geoscience Frontiers 12 (2021) 101075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.006. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chun-Fu Lin, Sheng-De Wang, Fuzzy support vector machines, IEEE Trans Neural Netw 13 (2002) 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.991432. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Bertsimas, J. Tsitsiklis, Simulated Annealing, Statistical Science 8 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011077. [Google Scholar]
  16. R.A. Rutenbar, Simulated annealing algorithms: an overview, IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine 5 (1989) 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/101.17235. [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Marzban, The ROC Curve and the Area under It as Performance Measures, Weather Forecast 19 (2004) 1106–1114. https://doi.org/10.1175/825.1. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Janizadeh, M. Avand, A. Jaafari, T. Van Phong, M. Bayat, E. Ahmadisharaf, I. Prakash, B.T. Pham, S. Lee, Prediction success of machine learning methods for flash flood susceptibility mapping in the Tafresh watershed, Iran, Sustainability 11 (2019) 5426. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195426. [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Islam, E.B. Zeleke, M. Afroz, A.M. Melesse, A Systematic Review of Urban Flood Susceptibility Mapping: Remote Sensing, Machine Learning, and Other Modeling Approaches, Remote Sens (Basel) 17 (2025) 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030524. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.