EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 344 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 344 (2025) 01009 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 344, 2025
AI-Integrated Physics, Technology, and Engineering Conference (AIPTEC 2025)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 10
Section AI-Integrated Physics, Technology, and Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534401009
Published online 22 December 2025
  1. M. Nadeem, A. Khan, M. A. Javeed, dan Z. Yubin, Analytical Scheme for Time Fractional Kawahara and Modified Kawahara Problems in Shallow Water Waves. Fractal and Fractional. 8, 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8070395 [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Fevola dan C. Görgen, The mathematical research-data repository MathRepo. MathRepo. (2022). http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04022 [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Russo, L. M. Siena, S. Farina, R. Pastorino, S. Boccia, dan J. P. A., Ioannidis, Genetic and Other Omics-Based Information in the Most-Cited Recent Clinical Trials. Europan Journal of Public Health. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.21.24315878 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. M. Meadows, M. M. Skinner, A. A. Hazime, R. G. Day, J. A. Fore, dan C. S., Day, Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Diversity in Academic Medical Leadership. JAMA Network Open. 6, 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35529 [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Yao dan U. Younas, Diversity of Solitonic Wave Structures to the M-truncated Dynamical System in Ultrasound Imaging. Mathematical Methods in Applied Sciences. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.10260 [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Aounzou, F. Kalloubi, dan A. Boulaalam, A Blockchain of Things System for Managing Handcrafted Products in a Cultural Industry. Sensors. (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/s24227384 [Google Scholar]
  7. I. K. Amalina dan T. Vidákovich, Cognitive and Socioeconomic Factors That Influence the Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills of Students. Heliyon. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19539 [Google Scholar]
  8. S. L. Yusrina, M. Masriyah, dan P. Wijayanti, Algebraic Thinking Profile of Junior High School Students With Reflective Cognitive Style in Solving Mathematics Problems. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM). (2023). https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v7n1.p75-84 [Google Scholar]
  9. C. F. Smith dan T. M. Choo, Revisiting Security Administration in the Classroom: A Decade Later. Security Journal. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2013.7 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Horky, The Relationship Between the Implementation of the Common Core State Standards and 21st Century Learning Skills. Dominican University of California. (2013). https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2013.edu. 07 [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Castro, J. Medina-Paredes, C. Aguilera, dan M. H. R. Díaz, Robotics Education in STEM Units: Breaking Down Barriers in Rural Multigrade Schools. Sensors. (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010387 [Google Scholar]
  12. NCTM, Principles Standards and for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. (2000) [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Maphutha, P. Mutodi, dan E. Phele, Exploring Grade 11 Learners’ Mathematical Connections When Solving Trigonometric Equations. Symmetry Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education. (2023). https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v8i1.7344 [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Rafiepour dan N. Faramarzpour, Investigation of the Mathematical Connection’s Ability of 9th Grade Students. Journal on Mathematics Education. (2023). https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp339- 352 [Google Scholar]
  15. R. AlAli, Y. Wardat, M. M. Helali, dan N. Alshraifin, Understanding Word Problems: Pre- Service Math Teacher Proficiency. Environment and Social Psychology. (2024). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i7.2812 [Google Scholar]
  16. A. N. Faidah, B. P. Darminto, dan H. Kurniawan, Application of the Reciprocal Teaching Model in Class XI Mathematics Learning. Edumaspul - Jurnal Pendidikan. (2023). https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.5763 [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Pd. N. I. Wahyuni, Handout Design of Scientific- Based Mathematics and Inquiry Strategies. Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE). (2023). https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v4i2.318 [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Djudin, An Easy Way to Solve Problems of Physics by Using Metacognitive Strategies: A Quasy-Experimental Study on Prospective Teachers in Tanjungpura University-Indonesia. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education. (2020). https://doi.org/10.12785/jtte/080103 [Google Scholar]
  19. Napis, Y. Yufiarti, dan M. K. Wirasti, Development of Multiple Representation Models in Physics Mechanics Learning Using a Self-Regulated Learning Approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/2866/1/012101 [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Retnawati, J. Arlinwibowo, N. F. Wulandari, dan R. G. Pradani, Teachers’ Difficulties and Strategies in Physics Teaching and Learning That Applying Mathematics. Journal of Baltic Science Education. (2018). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.120 [Google Scholar]
  21. P. N. Iwuanyanwu, Addressing common deficiencies of mathematics skills among chemistry student teachers. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences. 17, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v17i1.1 [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Anchen and Z. Ying, Mathematics learning performance: its correlation with chemistry learning performance. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 5, 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v5i2.12075 [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Habiddin, Chemistry students’ mathematics ability and their understanding of buffer solution. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. (2023). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.3682 [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Fauzie, A. U. T. Pada, and S. Supriatno, Analysis of the difficulty index of item bank according to cognitive aspects during the Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. 25, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i2.42603 [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Bogdan and S. K. Biklen. Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. p.276 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  26. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI Laporan hasil ujian nasional 2013. (2013). Jakarta. [Google Scholar]
  27. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI Laporan hasil ujian nasional 2014. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  28. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI Laporan hasil ujian nasional 2015. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  29. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI Laporan hasil ujian nasional 2016. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  30. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI Laporan hasil ujian nasional 2017. (2017). Jakarta. [Google Scholar]
  31. P. Klein, S. Küchemann, S. Brückner, O. Zlatkin‐ Troitschanskaia, and J. Kühn, Student understanding of graph slope and area under a curve: a replication study comparing first-year physics and economics students. Phys Rev Phys Educ Res. 15, 020116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.15.020116 [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Haraldsrud and T. O. B. Odden, From integrated rate laws to integrating rate laws: computation as a conceptual catalyst. J. Chem. Educ. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00881 [Google Scholar]
  33. T. Banerjee and M. K. Gautam, Inclusive mathematics classroom practices for children with diverse learning needs from the perspective of cognitive load theory. Epra International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR). (2024). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra16279 [Google Scholar]
  34. I. Okoye-Ogbalu and V. Nnadozie, Subject competency and teacher knowledge: an exploration of second-year pre-service mathematics teachers’ difficulties in solving logarithmic problems using basic rules for logarithm. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. (2024). https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13887 [Google Scholar]
  35. F. M. Mangubat and M. T. Picardal, Predictors of chemistry learning among first year university students. International Journal of Instruction. (2023). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1622a [Google Scholar]
  36. A. N. A. Mugnianingsih, Students’ learning difficulties in problem solving ability in face-to- face learning limited elementary school. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Guru Sekolah Dasar (JPPGUSEDA). (2022). https://doi.org/10.55215/jppguseda.v5i2.5979 [Google Scholar]
  37. E. Syabila, A. T. Prayitno, and M. I. Riyadi, Analysis of mathematical problem solving ability in STEM – problem based learning viewed by students’ self-confidence. in 1st Universitas Kuningan International Conference on Social Science, Environment and Technology (UNiSET), Dec. 2020. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-12-2020.2305119 [Google Scholar]
  38. J. G. Uzezi, D. Ezekiel, and A.-K. M. Auwal, Assessment of conceptual difficulties in chemistry syllabus of the Nigerian science curriculum as perceived by high school college students. Am J Educ Res. (2017). https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-7-3 [Google Scholar]
  39. O. Gulacar, E. Z. Huie, R. U. Sathe, A. Wadhwa, and E. V. Santos, Facilitating concept map analysis: generating and evaluating representative general chemistry concept maps with a novel use of ImageJ, Gephi, JPathfinder, and R. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. (2022). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11484 [Google Scholar]
  40. N. Akkuzu and M. A. Uyulgan, Linking the representation levels to a physical separation and purification method in chemistry: understanding of distillation experiment. Journal of Pedagogical Research. (2021). https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.2021370703 [Google Scholar]
  41. H. Djidu and H. Retnawati, Character Education for 21st Century Global Citizens. Yogyakarta: Routledge (2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315104188 [Google Scholar]
  42. H. Djidu and H. Retnawati, Developing problem based calculus learning model. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran. 2, 68–84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v2i1.12689 [Google Scholar]
  43. H. R. Kwack and E. A. Im, A study of pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the use of ChatGPT in practical gardening training. Journal of People Plants and Environment. (2023). https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.6.693 [Google Scholar]
  44. M. Susilayati, W. Hardyanto, S. Supriyadi, and A. Widiyatmoko, The research trends and contributions of science education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative systematic literature review of publications in selected journals. Review of Education. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3464 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.