Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 344, 2025
AI-Integrated Physics, Technology, and Engineering Conference (AIPTEC 2025)
Article Number 01043
Number of page(s) 5
Section AI-Integrated Physics, Technology, and Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534401043
Published online 22 December 2025
  1. J. H. R. Burns, D. Delparte, R. D. Gates, M. Takabayashi, Integrating structure-from-motion photogrammetry with geospatial software as a novel technique for quantifying 3D ecological characteristics of coral reefs. PeerJ. 2015a, 7 2015. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1077 [Google Scholar]
  2. J. H. R. Burns, D. Delparte, R. D. Gates, M. Takabayashi, Utilizing Underwater Three- Dimensional Modeling To Enhance Ecological And Biological Studies Of Coral Reefs. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. XL–5(W5), 61–66 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W5-61-2015 [Google Scholar]
  3. J. C. Bythell, P. Pan, Three-dimensional morphometric measurements of reef corals using underwater photogrammetry techniques. Coral Reefs. 20, 193–199 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003380100157 [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Cecarwati, F. F. Muhsoni, D. Irawan, Perhitungan Volume dan Berat Terumbu Karang Menggunakan Foto Grametri Bawah Air 3 Dimensi Di Pulau Gili Labak, Sumenep. Jurnal Kelautan. 17, 2, 2476–9991 (2024). http://doi.org/10.21107/jk.v17i2.23179ABSTRAK [Google Scholar]
  5. L. A. Courtney, W. S. Fisher, S. Raimondo, L. M. Oliver, W. P. Davis, Estimating 3-dimensional colony surface area of field corals. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 351(1– 2), 234–242 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.06.021 [Google Scholar]
  6. L. M. C. de Oliveira, A. Lim, L. A. Conti, A. J. Wheeler, 3D Classification of Cold-Water Coral Reefs: A Comparison of Classification Techniques for 3D Reconstructions of Cold-Water Coral Reefs and Seabed. Frontiers in Marine Science. 8, 1–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.640713 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. W. O. Greene, S. Marshall, J. Li, C. P. Dahlgren, Reefshape : A System for the Efficient Collection and Automated Processing of Time-Series Underwater Photogrammetry Data for Benthic Habitat Monitoring. Jove, June. 1–23 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3791/67343 [Google Scholar]
  8. G. A. Hatcher et al., Accurate Bathymetric Maps From Underwater Digital Imagery Without Ground Control. Frontiers in Marine Science. 7, 525, 1–20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00525 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Herler, M. Dirnwöber, A simple technique for measuring buoyant weight increment of entire, transplanted coral colonies in the field. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 407, 2, 250–255 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.06.022 [Google Scholar]
  10. J. E. House et al., Moving to 3D: relationships between coral planar area, surface area and volume. PeerJ. 1–19 (2018). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4280 [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Irawan, F. Muhsoni, Metode Foto 3D Underwater Untuk Terumbu Karang. UTMPRESS. (2023). https://simpelmas.trunojoyo.ac.id/backend/assets/u ploads/lb/LB202503121741755036619.pdf [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Irawan, A. T. Mukti, S. Andriyono, F. F. Muhsoni, Three-dimensional (3D) modelling to determine the weight of massive corals in Gili Labak Island, Sumenep, Madura, East Java, Indonesia. Biodiversity, 24(1–2),23–33 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2023.2184425 [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Kabiri, H. Rezai, M. Moradi, A drone-based method for mapping the coral reefs in the shallow coastal waters – case study: Kish Island, Persian Gulf. Earth Science Informatics. 13, 4, 1265–1274 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00507- z [Google Scholar]
  14. N. A. Kornder et al., Implications of 2D versus 3D surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities. Coral Reefs. 40, 1137–1153 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338 [Google Scholar]
  15. I. D. Lange, C. T. Perry, A quick, easy and non- invasive method to quantify coral growth rates using photogrammetry and 3D model comparisons. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 11, 6, 714–726 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13388 [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Lavy et al., A quick, easy and non-intrusive method for underwater volume and surface area evaluation of benthic organisms by 3D computer modelling. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 6, 521–531 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/2041- 210X.12331 [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Lekatompessy, N. Sa’adah, N. I. Wijaya, Identifikasi Penyakit Pada Terumbu Karang di Pulau Gili Labak, Sumenep, Madura. Journal of Marine Research. 12, 4, 604–612 (2023). https://doi.org/10.14710/jmr.v12i4.41474 [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Macedo, C. De. Oliveira, A. Lim, L. A. Conti, A. J. Wheeler, High-resolution 3D mapping of cold- water coral reefs using machine learning. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 1–20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1044706 [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Medellı, I. D. L. Id, A. Molina-herna, Structure- from-motion photogrammetry demonstrates variability in coral growth within colonies and across habitats. PLoS ONE. 1–15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277546 [Google Scholar]
  20. F. F. Muhsoni, I. W. Abida, Pemanfaatan Foto Bawah Air 3D dan Citra AUV/Drone untuk Evaluasi Dampak Wisata Selam Terhadap Ekosistem Terumbu Karang di Pulau Gili Labak. (2021). [Google Scholar]
  21. I. L. Ochhead, N. Hedley, Evaluating The 3d Integrity Of Underwater Structure From Motion Workflows. The Photogrammetric Record. 37, 35–60 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/phor.12399 [Google Scholar]
  22. G. T. Raber, S. R. Schill, Reef rover: A low-cost small autonomous unmanned surface vehicle (usv) for mapping and monitoring coral reefs. Drones. 3, 2, 1–22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3020038 [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Reichert, J. Schellenberg, P. Schubert, T. Wilke, 3D scanning as a highly precise, reproducible, and minimally invasive method for surface area and volume measurements of scleractinian corals. Limnology and Oceanography. 14, 518–526 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10109 [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Safuan, W. H. Boo, H. Y. Siang, L. H. Chark, Z. Bachok, Optimization of Coral Video Transect Technique for Coral Reef Survey: Comparison with Intercept Transect Technique. Open Journal of Marine Science. 5, 4, 379–397 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4236/ojms.2015.54031 [Google Scholar]
  25. M. J. Westoby et al., Geomorphology ‘Structure- from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology. 179, 300–314 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. K. M. Quigley, A fast , precise , in- • vivo method for micron- • level 3D models of corals using dental scanners. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2159–2166 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/2041- 210X.13959 [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Zhong et al., Cutting-edge 3D reconstruction solutions for underwater coral reef images: A review and comparison. ArXiv. 2502, 20154, 1, 1–12 (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.20154 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.