Open Access
| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 345, 2026
4th International Conference & Exposition on Materials, Manufacturing and Modelling Techniques (ICE3MT2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01060 | |
| Number of page(s) | 15 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202634501060 | |
| Published online | 07 January 2026 | |
- M. Arunadevi and V. N. V. Bhandarkar, “Surface Roughness Prediction Using ANN Regression and Classification Model for S30C Alloy Metals Parts Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion,” J. Inst. Eng. Ser. D, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-024-00840-3 [Google Scholar]
- H. Y. Ma et al., “Advances in additively manufactured titanium alloys by powder bed fusion and directed energy deposition: Microstructure, defects, and mechanical behavior,” J. Mater. Sci. Technol., vol. 183, pp. 32–62 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2023.11.003 [Google Scholar]
- S. McConnell, Y. Beshay, K. Kourousis, and D. Tanner, “Increasing productivity for laser powder bed fusion of Ti–6Al–4V parts through increased layer thickness,” Prog. Addit. Manuf., no. 0123456789 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-025-01079-4 [Google Scholar]
- M. Gor et al., “A critical review on effect of process parameters on mechanical and microstructural properties of powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of ss316l,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216527 [Google Scholar]
- A. Paraschiv, G. Matache, M. R. Condruz, T. F. Frigioescu, and L. Pambaguian, “Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Parameters’ Optimization for Fabrication of Dense IN 625,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165777 [Google Scholar]
- B. Gaur, R. Ghyar, and R. Bhallamudi, “Parameter Optimization for Printing Ti6Al4V- Alloy Patient-Customized Orthopaedic Implants by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Using Physio-mechanical Properties and Biological Evaluations,” Indian J. Orthop., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 797–804 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-021-00577-1 [Google Scholar]
- M. B. and E. A. Behzad Fotovvati, Modeling and Optimization Approaches of Laser- Based Powder-Bed Fusion Process for Ti-6Al-4V Alloy” Coatings 2020, pp. 1–29, (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10111104 [Google Scholar]
- S. Xiao, J. Li, Z. Wang, Y. Chen, and S. Tofighi, “Advancing Additive Manufacturing Through Machine Learning Techniques: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Futur. Internet, vol. 16, no. 11 (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16110419 [Google Scholar]
- S. Kumar et al., “Machine learning techniques in additive manufacturing: a state of the art review on design, processes and production control,” J. Intell. Manuf., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 21–55, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02029-5 [Google Scholar]
- J. Sarma, R. Kumar, A. K. Sahoo, and A. Panda, “Enhancement of material properties of titanium alloys through heat treatment process: A brief review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 23, no. xxxx, pp. 561–564, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.409 [Google Scholar]
- P. O. Omoniyi, E. T. Akinlabi, and R. M. Mahamood, “Heat Treatments of Ti6Al4V Alloys for Industrial Applications: An Overview,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1107, no. 1, p. 012094, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1107/1/012094 [Google Scholar]
- Z. Xiao et al., “Residual stress, microstructure and micro-hardness evolution of laser powder bed fusion Ti6Al4V: Effect of stress relief annealing,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 37, no. May, pp. 3815–3821, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.07.039 [Google Scholar]
- Y. Xu, Y. Lu, K. L. Sundberg, J. Liang, and R. D. Sisson, “Effect of Annealing Treatments on the Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Behavior of Direct Metal Laser Sintered Ti-6Al-4V,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 2572–2582, (2017). 10.1007/s11665-017-2710-y [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

