Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 346, 2026
25th Topical Conference on Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas (RFPPC2025)
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 6
Section Theory and Modeling of Radio-Frequency Waves in Plasmas
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202634601006
Published online 07 January 2026
  1. A. Ekedahl, C. Bourdelle, J.F. Artaud, J.M. Bernard, H. Bufferand et al., Development of long pulse RF heating and current drive for Hmode scenarios with metallic walls in WEST, AIP Conference Proceedings 1689, 030013 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4936478 [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Nikkola, O. Sauter, R. Behn, S. Coda, I. Condrea et al., Modelling of the electron cyclotron current drive experiments in the TCV tokamak, Nuclear Fusion 43, 1343 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/43/11/006 [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Choi, S. Coda, J. Decker, J.A. Cazabonne, Y. Peysson, Study of suprathermal electron dynamics during electron cyclotron current drive using hard x-ray measurements in the TCV tokamak, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 62, 115012 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/abb0d3 [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Cazabonne, P. Donnel, S. Coda, J. Decker, G.D. Giannatale et al., Experimental and numerical investigations of electron transport enhancement by electron-cyclotron plasma-wave interaction in tokamaks, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 65, 104001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/acf39c [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Peysson, Transport of fast electrons during LHCD in TS, JET, and ASDEX, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 35, B253 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/35/SB/021 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Schmidt, P.T. Bonoli, O. Meneghini, R.R. Parker, M. Porkolab et al., Investigation of lower hybrid physics through power modulation experiments on Alcator C-Mod, Physics of Plasmas 18, 056122 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3593112 [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Moreau, the TORE SUPRA Team, Lower-hybrid current drive experiments in TORE SUPRA, Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics 4, 2165 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.860482 [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Giruzzi, J.L. Ségui, T.D. de Wit, Y. Michelot, Y. Peysson et al., Measurement of the time constants of fast electron distributions in the tore supra tokamak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 550 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.550 [Google Scholar]
  9. N.J.L. Cardozo, Perturbative transport studies in fusion plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 37, 799 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/37/8/001 [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Prater, Heating and current drive by electron cyclotron waves, Physics of Plasmas 11, 2349 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1690762 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Peysson, D. Mazon, J.F. Artaud, A. Ekedahl, L. Delpech et al., Lower hybrid current drive in high aspect ratio tokamaks, Journal of Fusion Energy 39, 270 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-020-00266-1 [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Decker, Y. Peysson, J.F. Artaud, E. Nilsson, A. Ekedahl et al., Damping of lower hybrid waves in large spectral gap configurations, Physics of Plasmas 21, 092504 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4894749 [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. Peysson, F. Imbeaux, Tomography of the fast electron bremsstrahlung emission during lower hybrid current drive on TORE SUPRA, Review of Scientific Instruments 70, 3987 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1150025 [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Barbui, L.F. Delgado-Aparicio, Y. Savoye-Peysson, B. Stratton, R. Dumont et al., Versatile multi-energy hard x-ray camera to study confined and unconfined fast electron dynamics and anisotropies, Review of Scientific Instruments 95, 083539 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0219159 [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Gnesin, S. Coda, J. Decker, Y. Peysson, Suprathermal electron studies in the TCV tokamak: Design of a tomographic hard-X-ray spectrometer, Review of Scientific Instruments 79, 10F504 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2957843 [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Giruzzi, M. Zabiégo, T. Gianakon, X. Garbet, A. Cardinali et al., Dynamical modelling of tearing mode stabilization by RF current drive, Nuclear Fusion 39, 107 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/39/1/307 [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Cazabonne, S. Coda, J. Decker, O. Krutkin, U. Kumar et al., Impact of microwave beam scattering by density fluctuations on the electron–cyclotron power deposition profile in tokamaks, Nuclear Fusion 64, 026019 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad1af6 [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Peysson, J. Decker, Numerical simulations of the radio-frequency-driven toroidal current in tokamaks, Fusion Science and Technology 65, 22 (2014). https://doi.org/10.13182/FST13-643 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Peysson, J. Decker, L. Morini, A versatile ray-tracing code for studying rf wave propagation in toroidal magnetized plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 54, 045003 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/54/4/045003 [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Artaud, F. Imbeaux, J. Garcia, G. Giruzzi, T. Aniel et al., Metis: a fast integrated tokamak modelling tool for scenario design, Nuclear Fusion 58, 105001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aad5b1 [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Hillairet, D. Voyer, A. Ekedahl, M. Goniche, M. Kazda et al., ALOHA: an Advanced LOwer Hybrid Antenna coupling code, Nuclear Fusion 50, 125010 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/50/12/125010 [Google Scholar]
  22. J.M. Moret, B.P. Duval, H.B. Le, S. Coda, F. Felici et al., Tokamak equilibrium reconstruction code LIUQE and its real time implementation, Fusion Engineering and Design 91, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.09.019 [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. Peysson, J. Decker, Fast electron bremsstrahlung in axisymmetric magnetic configuration, Physics of Plasmas 15, 092509 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2981391 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.