EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 346 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 346 (2026) 02022 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 346, 2026
25th Topical Conference on Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas (RFPPC2025)
Article Number 02022
Number of page(s) 7
Section Wave Heating and Current Drive in Present and Future Fusion Devices
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202634602022
Published online 07 January 2026
  1. G. Federici et al., The EU DEMO staged design approach in the pre-concept design phase, Fus. Eng. Des. 173, 112959 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112959 [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Coleman et al., Definition of an EU-DEMO design point robust to epistemic plasma physics uncertainties, Nucl. Fusion 65, 036039 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ada6d9 [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Federici et al., Testing needs for the development and qualification of a breeding blanket for DEMO, Nucl. Fusion 63, 125002 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad00cb [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Bachmann et al., Engineering concept of the VNS - a beam-driven tokamak for component testing, Fus. Eng. Des. 211, 114796 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2024.114796 [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Franke et al., Integration concept of an electron cyclotron system in DEMO, Fus. Eng. Des. 168, 112653 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112653 [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Siccinio et al., Plasma scenario definition for a Volumetric Neutron Source (VNS) for component testing and qualification, in preparation. [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Poli et al., ECCD studies for EC-DEMO plasmas, EPJ Web of Conf. 313, 01005 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202431301005 [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Haertl et al., Vacuum pumping concept for quasicontinuous NBI operation at a steady state fusion machine, Fus. Eng. Des. 213, 114864 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114864 [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Hopf et al., Neutral Beam Injection for a tokamak-based Volumetric Neutron Source, Fus. Eng. Des. 213, 114870 (2025). https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114870 [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Franke et al., Integration studies of a positive neutral beam injector system into the design of a volumetric neutron source, Fus. Eng.Des. 215, 115035 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.115035 [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Albanese et al., CREATE-NL+: A robust controloriented free boundary dynamic plasma equilibrium solver, Fus. Eng. Des. 96-97, 664 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.06.162 [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Acampora et al., Scenario feasibility and plasma controllability for Volumetric Neutron Source (VNS), Fus. Eng. Des. 217, 115053 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.06.162 [Google Scholar]
  13. G. V. Pereverzev, P. N. Yushmanov, ASTRA: Automated System for Transport Analysis in Tokamaks, IPP 5/98, Garching: Max-Planck-Institut fur Plasmaphysik (2002). https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0027-4510-D [Google Scholar]
  14. T. C. Luce et al., Generation of localized noninductive current by electron cyclotron waves on the DIIID tokamak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4550 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4550 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Snicker et al., The effect of density fluctuations on electron cyclotron beam broadening and implications for ITER, Nucl. Fusion 58, 016002 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aa8d07 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Ramponi et al., Physics analysis of the ITER ECW system for optimized performance, Nucl. Fusion 48, 054012 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/ 48/5/054012 [Google Scholar]
  17. M. A. Henderson et al., Overview of the ITER EC upper launcher, Nucl. Fusion 48, 054013 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/48/5/054013 [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Poli et al., TORBEAM 2.0, a paraxial beam tracing code for electron-cyclotron beams in fusion plasmas for extended physics applications, Comp. Phys. Comm. 225, 36 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2017.12.018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Poli et al., Fast evaluation of the current driven by electron cyclotron waves for reactor studies, Phys. Plasmas 25, 125001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5050345 [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Poli et al., Electron-cyclotron-current-drive efficiency in DEMO plasmas, Nucl. Fusion 53, 013011 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/53/1/013011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Xi Chen et al., Doubling off-axis electron cyclotron current drive efficiency via velocity space engineering, Nucl. Fusion 62, 054001 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ac544a [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. N. J. Fisch and A. H. Boozer, Creating an asymmetric plasma resistivity with waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 720 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.720 [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. R. LinLiu et al., Electron cyclotron current drive efficiency in general tokamak geometry, Phys. Plasmas 10, 4064 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1610472 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. N. B. Marushchenko et al., Electron cyclotron current drive calculated for ITER conditions using different models, Nucl. Fusion 48, 054002 (2008) and Erratum Nucl. Fusion 49, 129801 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/48/5/054002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. O. Sauter et al., Marginal β-limit for neoclassical tearing modes in JET H-mode discharges, Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. 44, 1999 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/44/9/315 [Google Scholar]
  26. H. Zohm et al., Control of NTMs by ECCD on ASDEX Upgrade in view of ITER applications, Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. 49, B341 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/49/12B/S31 [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Tsironis et al., Electron-cyclotron wave scattering by edge density fluctuations in ITER, Phys. Plasmas 16, 112510 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3264105 [Google Scholar]
  28. H. Weber et al., Scattering of diffracting beams of electron cyclotron waves by random density fluctuations in inhomogeneous plasmas, EPJ Web of Conf. 87, 01002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20158701002 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Köhn et al., Microwave beam broadening due to turbulent plasma density fluctuations within the limit of the Born approximation and beyond, Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. 60, 075006 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/aac000 [Google Scholar]
  30. O. Chellaï et al., Millimeter-wave beam scattering and induced broadening by plasma turbulence in the TCV tokamak, Nucl. Fusion 61, 066011 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/abf43f [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. C. C. Petty et al, Detailed measurements of the electron cyclotron current drive efficiency on DIII-D, Nucl. Fusion 42, 1366 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/42/12/303 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.