Open Access
| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 346, 2026
25th Topical Conference on Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas (RFPPC2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02024 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Wave Heating and Current Drive in Present and Future Fusion Devices | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202634602024 | |
| Published online | 07 January 2026 | |
- D. J. Cruz-Zabala et al., Performance prediction applying different reduced turbulence models to the SMART tokamak, Nucl. Fusion 64, 126071 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad8a70 [Google Scholar]
- A. Mancini et al., Predictive simulations for plasma scenarios in the SMART tokamak, Fus. Eng. Des. 192, 11833 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2023.113833 [Google Scholar]
- M. Podestà et al., NBI optimization on SMART and implications for scenario development, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 66, 045021 (2024). https://doi.org/10. 1088/1361-6587/ad2edc [Google Scholar]
- N. B. Marushchenko, Y. Turkin, and H. Maassberg, Ray-tracing code TRAVIS for ECR heating, EC current drive and ECE diagnostic, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 165 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2013.09. 002 [Google Scholar]
- A. Mancini et al., Mechanical and electromagnetic design of the vacuum vessel of the SMART tokamak, Fus. Eng. Des. 171, 112542 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.fusengdes.2021.112542 [Google Scholar]
- K. Hamamatsu and A. Fukuyama, Numerical analysis of electron cyclotron current drive with suppressed Doppler broadening, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 42, 1309 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/42/12/ 306 [Google Scholar]
- R. W. Harvey and F. W. Perkins, Comparison of optimized ECCD for different launch locations in a next step tokamak reactor plasma, Nucl. Fusion 41, 1847 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/41/12/312 [Google Scholar]
- E. Poli et al., Electron-cyclotron-current-drive efficiency in DEMO plasmas, Nucl. Fusion 53, 013011 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/53/1/013011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. M. Garofalo et al., Progress in the physics basis of a Fusion Nuclear Science Facility based on the Advanced Tokamak concept, Nucl. Fusion 54, 073015 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/54/7/073015 [Google Scholar]
- Y.-s. Bae, W. Namkung and M. H. Cho, Ray Tracing Study on Top ECCD Launch in KSTAR, EPJ Web Conf. 157 03003 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/ epjconf/201715703003 [Google Scholar]
- E. Poli et al., Fast evaluation of the current driven by electron cyclotron waves for reactor studies, Phys. Plasmas 25, 122501 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1. 5050345 [Google Scholar]
- Xi. Chen et al., Top Launch for Higher Offaxis Electron Cyclotron Current Drive Efficiency, EPJ Web Conf. 203, 01004 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1051/ epjconf/201920301004 [Google Scholar]
- Xi. Chen et al., Doubling off-axis electron cyclotron current drive efficiency via velocity space engineering, Nucl. Fusion 62, 054001 (2022). https://doi.org/10. 1088/1741-4326/ac544a [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Ono et al., Efficient electron cyclotron current drive regime for plasma current start-up in fusion reactors, Phys. Review E 106, L023201 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.L023201 [Google Scholar]
- M. Ono et al., Time dependent model for non-inductive ECH X-I current ramp-up for SHPD tokamak facility, AIP Conference Proceedings 2984, 110002 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0163394 [Google Scholar]
- M. Ono et al., Efficient ECCD non-inductive plasma current startup, ramp-up, and sustainment for an ST fusion reactor, Nucl. Fusion 64, 086021 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad556f [Google Scholar]
- R. W. Harvey, M. G. McCoy and G. D. Kerbel, Power Dependence of Electron-Cyclotron Current Drive for Low-and High-Field Absorption in Tokamaks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 426 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.426 [Google Scholar]
- R. Prater et al., Benchmarking of codes for electron cyclotron heating and electron cyclotron current drive under ITER conditions, Nucl. Fusion 48, 035006 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/48/ 3/035006 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

