Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 351, 2026
The 11th International Symposium on Hydrogen Energy, Renewable Energy, and Materials (HEREM 2025)
Article Number 01017
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635101017
Published online 05 February 2026
  1. T. Kemperdick, P. Letmathe, T. Brachmann, et al. Techno-economic analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell recycling through pyroand hydrometallurgy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 508, 145432 (2025) doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145432 [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Zhang, Y. Shao, S. Deng, et al. Multi-Objective Optimization of Operating Parameters of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells by Coupling Surrogate Model and Intelligent Algorithm. Fuel Cells, 25, e70033 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.70033 [Google Scholar]
  3. I.E. Baranov, S.A. Grigoriev, D. Ylitalo, et al. Transfer processes in PEM fuel cell: Influence of electrode structure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 31, 203 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.047 [Google Scholar]
  4. M.S. Mamat, S.A. Grigoriev, K.A. Dzhus, et al. The performance and degradation of Pt electrocatalysts on novel carbon carriers for PEMFC applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35, 7580 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.147 [Google Scholar]
  5. N.A. Ivanova, O.K. Alekseeva, V.N. Fateev, et al. Activity and durability of electrocatalytic layers with low platinum loading prepared by magnetron sputtering onto gas diffusion electrodes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44, 29529 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.096 [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Feng, D. Ma, H. Xu, et al. Modified agglomerate model for low-Pt cathode catalyst layer in PEMFC. J. Energy Eng., 151, 04024042 (2025). doi: 10.1061/JLEED9.EYENG-5731 [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Tian, M.S. Ismail, K.J. Hughes, et al. Influence of the internal structure of catalyst agglomerates on PEFC performance investigated using a multiscale numerical model. Fuel, 371, 131862 (2024). doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131862 [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Karan, Assessment of transport-limited catalyst utilization for engineering of ultra-low Pt loading polymer electrolyte fuel cell anodes. Electrochem. Commun., 9, 747 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.10.057 [Google Scholar]
  9. V.D. Mikhnevich, A.A. Kalinnikov, S.I. Nefedkin, et al. Computational optimization of proton-exchange membrane fuel cell efficiency: Influence of the bipolar plate profile on the current–voltage characteristic. Russ. J. Electrochem., 61, 789 (2025). doi: 10.1134/S1023193525601068 [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Gao, H. Wang, Z. Zhang, et al., Semi-ordered catalyst layer with ultra-low Pt loading for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 606, 234516 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234516. [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Banham, J. Zou, S. Mukerjee, et al. Ultralow platinum loading proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Performance losses and solutions. Journal of Power Sources 490, 229515 (2021). doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229515 [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Fan, H. Deng, Y. Zhang, et al. Towards ultralow platinum loading proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci., 16, 1466 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE03169H [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.