Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 355, 2026
4th International Conference on Sustainable Technologies and Advances in Automation, Aerospace and Robotics (STAAAR 2025)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 16
Section Robotics, Exoskeletons and AI Modeling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635501001
Published online 03 March 2026
  1. Mahr, Dominik, Gaby Odekerken-Schröder, and Jenny van Doorn. “Evolution of service robots in marketing: A relational framework and future research agenda.” Journal of Business Research 192 (2025): 115204. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sun, Yi, and Rui Wang. “The research framework and evolution of service robots.” Journal of Computer Information Systems 62.3 (2022): 598-608. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gonzalez-Aguirre, Juan Angel, et al. “Service robots: Trends and technology.” Applied Sciences 11.22 (2021): 10702. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, Xiyuan, et al. “New Kinematic Control Scheme for Redundant Robotic Manipulators Perturbed by Harmonic Noise.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (2025). [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim, Jaeseok, et al. “Control strategies for cleaning robots in domestic applications: A comprehensive review.” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 16.4 (2019): 1729881419857432. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cherubini, Andrea, and David Navarro-Alarcon. “Sensor-based control for collaborative robots: Fundamentals, challenges, and opportunities.” Frontiers in Neurorobotics 14 (2021): 576846. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gorade, U., Bandhu, D., Kumari, S., Rath, J., Abhishek, K. (2022). Design of Bluetooth-Controlled Floor Cleaning Robot. In: Parwani, A.K., Ramkumar, P., Abhishek, K., Yadav, S.K. (eds) Recent Advances in Mechanical Infrastructure . Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7660-4_11 [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, Kaiwei, et al. “Design of elderly rehabilitation service system based on intelligent sensing and thermal energy circulation.” Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (2025): 103375. [Google Scholar]
  9. Acosta, Leopoldo, et al. “Design and implementation of a service robot for a restaurant.” International Journal of Robotics & Automation 21.4 (2006): 273. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tuomi, Aarni, Iis P. Tussyadiah, and Jason Stienmetz. “Applications and implications of service robots in hospitality.” Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 62.2 (2021): 232-247. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pinillos, Roberto, et al. “Long-term assessment of a service robot in a hotel environment.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 79 (2016): 40-57. [Google Scholar]
  12. Choi, Youngjoon, et al. “Service robots in hotels: understanding the service quality perceptions of human-robot interaction.” Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 29.6 (2020): 613-635. [Google Scholar]
  13. Reis, João, et al. “Service robots in the hospitality industry: The case of Henn-na hotel, Japan.” Technology in Society 63 (2020): 101423. [Google Scholar]
  14. Holland, Jane, et al. “Service robots in the healthcare sector.” Robotics 10.1 (2021): 47. [Google Scholar]
  15. Forlizzi, Jodi, and Carl DiSalvo. “Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home.” Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jayawardena, Chandimal, et al. “Deployment of a service robot to help older people.” 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, Minseong, et al. “Service robot for the elderly.” IEEE robotics & automation magazine 16.1 (2009): 34-45. [Google Scholar]
  18. Portugal, David, et al. “A study on the deployment of a service robot in an elderly care center.” International Journal of Social Robotics 11 (2019): 317-341. [Google Scholar]
  19. Garcia-Haro, Juan Miguel, et al. “Service robots in catering applications: A review and future challenges.” Electronics 10.1 (2020): 47. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Yi, and Chongli Wang. “Effect of customer's perception on service robot acceptance.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 46.4 (2022): 1241-1261. [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Tan, L. Yu, C. Li, and M. Q.-H. Meng, “Vision-Language Models Empowered Dual-Arm Mobile Manipulator for Household Services,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 72, pp. 1–13, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  22. Y. Song, J. Yang, and H. Qiu, “LLM-Planner: Leveraging Large Language Models for Interpretable Task Planning and User-Adapted Instruction in Warehouse Robotics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.02241, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Xin, A. Vemprala, et al., “The Isaac Gym Reinforcement Learning Environment for Robotics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10470, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  24. M. T. Abdulsattar, A. B. Rad, and A. N. Al-Araji, “Optimal Control for a Pick-and-Place Robotic Manipulator using Hybrid Deep Reinforcement Learning,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 76, p. 102360, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Abdolshah and J. Zhang, “Artificial Intelligence in Sensor-Driven Robots: A Review,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 150, p. 104070, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Taranto, M. Urgu, and R. Mura, “Robust Real-Time Object Recognition Using YOLOv2 and ResNet in Human-Robot Collaboration,” Machines, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 246, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Biesinger, M. Kraus, and A. Verl, “Digital Twin for Machine Learning-Based Control of Industrial Robots,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 97, pp. 385–390, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Panagou, V. Kyrarini, and D. Kosmas, “The Role of AI in Enhancing Human-Robot Collaboration: A Systematic Review,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 7, p. 3536, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  29. A. A. Drobotowicz and M. Malinowski, “Human-Robot Interaction Efficiency and Human-Robot Collaboration,” Machines, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 505, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  30. A. M. Zaki and H. A. Hefny, “Human-Robot Interaction: Applications,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1–9, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Weimer, C. Santoni de Sio, and J. O. Kephart, “A Concise Overview of Safety Aspects in Human-Robot Interaction,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 8, p. 6653, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  32. D. M. Lyons and A. D. Nguyen, “Safety Issues in Human-Robot Interactions,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Lasota, T. Fong, and J. A. Shah, “A Survey of Methods for Safe Human-Robot Interaction,” Foundations and Trends® in Robotics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 261–349, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  34. K. Papakostas, D. Kyritsis, and P. Maropoulos, “Safety Bounds in Human Robot Interaction: A Survey,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 5, p. 2485, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  35. R. Varghese, S. M., YOLOv8: A novel object detection algorithm with enhanced performance and robustness, in Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Advances in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing Systems (ADICS), Chennai, India (2024), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ADICS58448.2024.10533619 [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Mohapatra, K. Rajtilak, T. Sahoo, S. Mohanty, L.K. Sahoo, J.R. Nayak, Real-time servo motor control over Wi-Fi using ESP32 and WebSocket, in Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Innovations in Intelligent Systems: Advancements in Computing, Communication, and Cybersecurity (ISAC3), Bhubaneswar, India (2025), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISAC364032.2025.11156646 [Google Scholar]
  37. Y. Yasa, E. Sahin, C. Acar, A. Gozutok, E. Firat, E. Mese, Servo motor driver design for high performance applications, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems (EPECS 2013), Istanbul, Turkey (2013), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EPECS.2013.6713062 [Google Scholar]
  38. E. Pecker-Marcosig, S. Bocaccio, R. Castro, Bridging simulation formalisms and embedded targets: A PowerDEVS-driven IoT/robotics workflow for ESP32, in Proceedings of the 2025 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Seattle, WA, USA (2025), pp. 2764–2775. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC68292.2025.11339054 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.