EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 355 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 355 (2026) 03004 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 355, 2026
4th International Conference on Sustainable Technologies and Advances in Automation, Aerospace and Robotics (STAAAR 2025)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 11
Section Finite Element Analysis and Parametric Optimization
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635503004
Published online 03 March 2026
  1. Avilés, F., Ac México, And La Carlsson., Experimental studies of compression failure of sandwich specimens with face/core debond. Delamination Behaviour of Composites, 344-363 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  2. Charkaoui, Assil, Noha M. Hassan, and Zied Bahroun. Enhancing mechanical properties of cellular core sandwich panels: a review of topological parameters and design improvements. Materials Research Express 10.10 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  3. Rajkumar, S., et al. Evaluation of elastic constants of A3003 honeycomb core with varying hexagonal cell geometries through finite element approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 228,10 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  4. Swaeh, Karema J., and Ahmad F. Hamzah. Numerical and Experimental Analysis for Flexure Behavior of Pyramidal Core Sandwich Composite. Annales de Chimie. Science des Materiaux. Vol. 48. No. 6. International Information and Engineering Technology Association (IIETA), 2024. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zamani, Mohammad Hossein, Mohammad Heidari-Rarani, and Keivan Torabi. A novel graded auxetic honeycomb core model for sandwich structures with increasing natural frequencies. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials 24, 2 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang, Dongxia, Lihua Guo, and Changsheng Fan. Mechanical behavior of 3D-printed thickness gradient honeycomb structures. Materials 17, 12 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  7. Gigi, Chinnu, and Dalmiya Rajan. A review on honeycomb sandwich structures and hybrid structures. Carbon 1000 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, Shiqiang, et al. Finite element analysis of sandwich panels with stepwise graded aluminum honeycomb cores under blast loading. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 80 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  9. Rahman, Hammad, et al. Finite element analysis (FEA) of honeycomb sandwich panel for continuum properties evaluation and core height influence on the dynamic behavior. Advanced Materials Research 326 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  10. Ma, Quanjin, et al. A review of the recent trends on core structures and impact response of sandwich panels. Journal of Composite Materials 55.18 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  11. de Oliveira, Lívia Ávila, et al. An investigation on the mechanical behaviour of sandwich composite structures with circular honeycomb bamboo core. Discover Mechanical Engineering 1,1 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar, Anil, Surjit Angra, and Arindam Kumar Chanda. Analysis of effect of variation of honeycomb core cell size and sandwich panel width on the stiffness of a sandwich structure. Research on Engineering Structures & Materials 8, 1 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  13. Sun, Wei, et al. Study on Bearing Capacity of Honeycomb Sandwich Structure Embedded Parts. Journal of Composites Science 7, 7 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  14. Serjouei, A., et al. 4D printed shape memory sandwich structures: experimental analysis and numerical modeling. Smart Materials and Structures 31, 5 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, Yu-Hsi, and Chun-Yi Lin. “Measurement of orthotropic material constants and discussion on 3D printing parameters in additive manufacturing. Applied sciences 12, 13 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  16. Sivanraju, Rajkumar. Kumaravel R. Arul, Shetty P.K., Experimental Investigation of stiffness characteristics of tee joints of aluminium honeycomb core sandwich panels with different edging configurations, International conference on applications and design in mechanical engineering Feb 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. Grebenişan, Gavril, and Nazzal Salem. The multi-objective genetic algorithm optimization, of a superplastic forming process, using ansys®. MATEC Web of Conferences. Vol. 126. EDP Sciences, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gavade, N. K., et al. Design and Analysis of Corrugated Aluminium Sandwich Structures Using Ansys Workbench. International journal 3, 6 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  19. Aslantas, Kubilay, Ekrem Özkaya, and Waleed Ahmed. “ibration analysis of 3D printed PLA beam with honeycomb cell structure for renewable energy applications and sustainable solutions. Materials Research Proceedings 43 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  20. Sun, Risi, Xuefeng Liu, and Ningbo He. Modal analysis of honeycomb panel satellite structure based on MSC Apex. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 2762. No. 1. IOP Publishing (2024). [Google Scholar]
  21. Marythraza, M., et al. Vibration analysis of honeycomb sandwich panel in spacecraft structure. International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development 8, 3 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  22. Gupta, Krishanu, Prasun Chakraborti, and Chiranjit Bhowmik. Study of Modal Behaviour of Sandwich Structure with Various Core Materials-An Analytical Approach. Journal of Composite & Advanced Materials/Revue des Composites et des Matériaux Avancés 30.1 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  23. Safaei, Babak, Emmanuel Chukwueloka Onyibo, and Dogus Hurdoganoglu. Effect of static and harmonic loading on the honeycomb sandwich beam by using finite element method. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering 20, 2 (2022). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.