EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 355 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 355 (2026) 05004 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 355, 2026
4th International Conference on Sustainable Technologies and Advances in Automation, Aerospace and Robotics (STAAAR 2025)
Article Number 05004
Number of page(s) 21
Section Sustainable Composites and Mechanical Behavior
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635505004
Published online 03 March 2026
  1. V. Khadisov, Z. Taymaskhanova, A. Salamova, Carbon negative projects: perspectives and solutions (2023). https://doi.org/10.5220/0011554000003524 [Google Scholar]
  2. IPCC, Working group III mitigation of climate change (2020). https://www.ipcc.ch/working-group/wg3/ [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Uden, P. Dargusch, C. Greig, Cutting through the noise on negative emissions. Joule 5, 1956–1970 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.06.013 [Google Scholar]
  4. US EPA, Global greenhouse gas emissions data (2020). https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Pant, K.K. Shah, S. Sharma, M. Bhatta, S. Tripathi, H.P. Pandey, H. Tiwari, J. Shrestha, A.K. Bhat, Soil and ocean carbon sequestration, carbon capture, utilization, and storage as negative emission strategies for global climate change. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 23, 1421–1437 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01215-5 [Google Scholar]
  6. M.S. Meo, M.Z.A. Karim, The role of green finance in reducing CO₂ emissions: an empirical analysis. Borsa Istanb. Rev. 22, 169–178 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Hussain, G.M. Mir, M. Usman, C. Ye, S. Mansoor, Analysing the role of environment-related technologies and carbon emissions in emerging economies. Environ. Technol. 43, 367–375 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2020.1788171 [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Chen, Y. Zhang, C. Labianca, L. Wang, S. Ruan, C.S. Poon, Y.S. Ok, D.C.W. Tsang, Carbon-negative cement-bonded biochar particleboards. Biochar 4, 58 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00185-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J.H. Arehart, W.S. Nelson, W.V. Srubar III, On the theoretical carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of hempcrete. J. Clean. Prod. 266, 121846 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121846 [Google Scholar]
  10. M.G. Heyns, Development of a green concrete road barrier prototype in South Africa, Ph.D. thesis, Stellenbosch University (2022) [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Ding, Z. Pang, K. Lan, Y. Yao, G. Panzarasa, L. Xu, M. Lo Ricco et al., Emerging engineered wood for building applications. Chem. Rev. 123, 1843–1888 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00450 [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Van Roijen, S.A. Miller, Towards the production of net-negative greenhouse gas emission bio-based plastics. J. Clean. Prod. 445, 141203 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141203 [Google Scholar]
  13. U.K. Roy, T. Radu, J.L. Wagner, Carbon-negative biomethane fuel production. Biomass Bioenergy 148, 106029 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106029 [Google Scholar]
  14. X. Shan, High performance and carbon negative wood-microbes composite material, Master thesis, Purdue University (2023) [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Yang, Investigations of mycelium as a low-carbon building material (2020) [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Agrawal, K. Awani, S.A. Nabavi, V. Balan, M. Jin, T.M. Aminabhavi, K.K. Dubey, V. Kumar, Carbon emissions and decarbonisation: the role of fermentation industry. Chem. Eng. J. 146308 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.146308 [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Cosentino, J. Fernandes, R. Mateus, Fast-growing bio-based construction materials. Appl. Sci. 14, 4850 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114850 [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Rahighi, O. Akhavan, A.S. Zeraati, S.M. Sattari-Esfahlan, All-carbon negative differential resistance nanodevice. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3, 3418–3427 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.1c00396 [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Pendashteh et al., Boosting the performance of soft carbon negative electrode. Energy Storage Mater. 46, 417–430 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.01.030 [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Li, D. Tasnady, Biochar for soil carbon sequestration. C 9, 67 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/c9030067 [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Zhang et al., Biochar as construction materials for achieving carbon neutrality. Biochar 4, 59 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00182-x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Voruganti, Biochar applications in soil restoration. Environ. Rep. (2023). https://doi.org/10.51470/ER.2023.5.1.01 [Google Scholar]
  23. M. He et al., Waste-derived biochar for water pollution control. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 444–460 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  24. A.I. Osman et al., Biochar for agronomy and carbon sequestration: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 20, 2385–2485 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01424-x [Google Scholar]
  25. M.Z. Yameen et al., Harnessing the power of functionalized biochar. Biochar 6, 25 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00316-3 [Google Scholar]
  26. K. Chaturvedi et al., Bamboo for producing charcoal and biochar. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 14, 15159–15185 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03715-3 [Google Scholar]
  27. O.M. Ademola, F. Ajayi, B. Alade, Innovative building materials for decarbonization (2024). https://doi.org/10.56726/IRJMETS61835 [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Shanbhag, M.K. Dixit, P. Sideris, Examining the global warming potential of hempcrete. Dev. Built Environ. 100572 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100572 [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Gibson, Mainstreaming precast and block hempcrete. Acad. Mater. Sci. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.20935/AcadMatSci7369 [Google Scholar]
  30. I.B. Muhit, E.L. Omairey, V.G. Pashakolaie, A holistic sustainability overview of hemp. Build. Environ. 111470 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111470 [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Full et al., Carbon-negative hydrogen production from biomass. Sustainability 13, 4026 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074026 [Google Scholar]
  32. L. Chen et al., Biochar-augmented carbon-negative concrete. Chem. Eng. J. 431, 133946 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133946 [Google Scholar]
  33. K. Liu et al., Controlled graphene interfacial carbon nitride preparation. Electrochim. Acta 493, 144219 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.144219 [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Pendashteh et al., Boosting the performance of soft carbon negative electrode. Energy Storage Mater. 46, 417–430 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Laveglia, N. Ukrainczyk, N. De Belie, E. Koenders, From quarry to carbon sink: LCA modelling of lime-based materials. Green Chem. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1039/x0xx00000x [Google Scholar]
  36. Z. Wu et al., Sustainable pyrolytic carbon negative electrodes. J. Power Sources 621, 235262 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235262 [Google Scholar]
  37. Y. Bai et al., Geopolymer stabilization of carbon-negative gasified olive stone biochar. Constr. Build. Mater. 442, 137617 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137617 [Google Scholar]
  38. O. Zaid, F. Alsharari, M. Ahmed, Utilization of engineered biochar as a binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 417, 135246 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135246 [Google Scholar]
  39. H. Yang et al., Carbon-negative valorization of biomass waste. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 49, 459–471 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.096 [Google Scholar]
  40. H.K. Jeswani, D.M. Saharudin, A. Azapagic, Environmental sustainability of negative emissions technologies. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 33, 608–635 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.06.028 [Google Scholar]
  41. C.D. Scown, Prospects for carbon-negative biomanufacturing. Trends Biotechnol. 40, 1415–1424 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  42. A. Ganguly, R.C. Brown, M.M. Wright, Techno-economic and greenhouse gas emission assessment of carbon negative pyrolysis. Green Chem. 24, 9290–9302 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2gc03172h [Google Scholar]
  43. J. Byun, O. Kwon, J. Kim, J. Han, Carbon-negative food waste-derived bioethanol. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 10, 4512–4521 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  44. S. Gupta, P. Patel, P. Mondal, Life cycle analysis of carbon negative catalytic pyrolysis technique. Energy Fuels 37, 2960–2971 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  45. K. Madhu, S. Pauliuk, S. Dhathri, F. Creutzig, Environmental trade-offs of direct air capture technologies. Nat. Energy 6, 1035–1044 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00922-6 [Google Scholar]
  46. L. Li, Y. Jiang, S.-Y. Pan, T.-C. Ling, Comparative life cycle assessment of steel slag products. Constr. Build. Mater. 298, 123876 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123876 [Google Scholar]
  47. A.I. Osman et al., Pyrolysis of algal and lignocellulosic biomass: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 21, 1419–1476 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01573-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. L. Taslakyan et al., Biochar-integrated reactive filtration of wastewater. Water Environ. Res. 95, e10962 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10962 [Google Scholar]
  49. E. Kravchenko et al., Recycling waste concrete powder into CO₂-capture products. J. Environ. Manag. 352, 119947 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119947 [Google Scholar]
  50. D. Wen, P.-C. Kuo, S. Saeidi, F. Özdemir, F. Maréchal, Renewable synthesis fuels for a circular economy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 211, 107851 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107851 [Google Scholar]
  51. N. Rajashekar, D. Bandhu, K. Aravinda, M.K. Vishkarma, A. Singla, S. Ziara, Evaluation of green energy impacts for achieving global economic and environmental sustainability, in E3S Web Conf. 552, 01057 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  52. D. Bandhu, E. Umashankari, A. Dutt, P. Kumar, T.A.A.U. Abedi, A detailed review on sustainable engineering methods integrated with waste management practices, in E3S Web Conf. 552, 01058 (2024) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.