EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 355 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 355 (2026) 05006 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 355, 2026
4th International Conference on Sustainable Technologies and Advances in Automation, Aerospace and Robotics (STAAAR 2025)
Article Number 05006
Number of page(s) 25
Section Sustainable Composites and Mechanical Behavior
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635505006
Published online 03 March 2026
  1. G. Bumanis, A. Korjakins, and D. Bajare, “Environmental benefit of alternative binders in construction industry: life cycle assessment,” Environments, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 6, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. U. Siddique, M. Jawad, A. Ali, S. M. Cheema, M. A. Sultan, and M. J. Akhtar, “Green Cement Valuation: An Optimistic Approach to Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” J. Appl. Eng. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 259–268, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Won, “Green Cement: Comparative Assessment of Portland Cement Alternatives to Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions,” in 2024 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  4. P. S. Jalal, V. Srivastava, and A. K. Tiwari, “Geopolymer Concrete: An Alternative to Conventional Concrete for Sustainable Construction,” J. Environ. Nanotechnol, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 218–225, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Luga, E. Mustafaraj, M. Corradi, and C. D. Atiș, “Alkali-Activated Binders as Sustainable Alternatives to Portland Cement and Their Resistance to Saline Water,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 17, no. 17, p. 4408, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. A. F. Meor Ahmad Tajudin et al., “Assessment of Alkali Activated Geopolymer Binders as an Alternative of Portland Cement,” Mater. Plast., vol. 54, pp. 145–154, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. A. Siyal, K. A. Azizli, L. Ismail, Z. Man, and M. I. Khan, “Suitability of Malaysian fly ash for geopolymer synthesis,” Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 1133, pp. 201–205, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Soutsos, A. Boyle, R. Vinai, A. Hadjierakleous, and S. Barnett, “Suitability of coal fly ash for the development of geopolymer binders: effects of precursor properties and synthesis parameters,” in EuroCoalAsh 2017: Innovations in Power Plant Technology and CCP Utilization, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Chairunnisa et al., “Characteristics of fly ash as a constituent material for geopolymer,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2023, p. 12005. [Google Scholar]
  10. L. G. F. Domingues, G. C. dos Santos Ferreira, and M. S. G. Pires, “Waste foundry sand used to cover organic waste in landfills,” J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 378–385, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Bhardwaj, P. Kumar, S. Siddique, and A. Shukla, “Comprehensive review on utilization of waste foundry sand in concrete,” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1056–1087, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Rudge and R. Maddalena, “Waste Foundry Sand (WFS) as Aggregate Replacement for Green Concrete,” in Proceedings of the Cardiff University Engineering Research Conference 2023, Cardiff University Press, 2024, p. 52. [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Yildirim, A. Ashour, E. Ozcelikci, M. F. Gunal, and B. F. Ozel, “Development of geopolymer binders with mixed construction and demolition waste-based materials,” Eng. Proc., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 4, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Anwer, A. Saxena, and S. U. Khan, “Construction and demolition waste-based geopolymer concrete: a brief review,” Int. Res. J. Adv. Sci. Hub, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 108–119, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Sata and P. Chindaprasirt, “Use of construction and demolition waste (CDW) for alkali-activated or geopolymer concrete,” in Advances in construction and demolition waste recycling, Elsevier, 2020, pp. 385–403. [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Ramujee, K. S. Prasad, and B. N. Kumar, “Durability properties of ternary blended geopolymer concrete under ambient curing,” Int J Eng Technol, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 46–50, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. W. E. Elemam, A. M. Tahwia, M. Abdellatief, O. Youssf, and M. A. Kandil, “Durability, microstructure, and optimization of high-strength geopolymer concrete incorporating construction and demolition waste,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 22, p. 15832, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  18. X. Lin et al., “High-Performance Geopolymers with Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash: Influence on the Mechanical and Environmental Properties,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 3518, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  19. H. K. Naik and M. K. Mishra, “Characterization of Indian fly ashes for mine stowing purposes,” 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Malik, N. K. Soni, K. V Kanagasabapathy, M. V. R. Prasad, and K. K. Satpathy, “Characterisation of fly ash from coal-fired thermal power plants using energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry,” Sci. Rev. Chem. Commun, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 91–101, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. V Vassilev, R. Menendez, D. Alvarez, M. Diaz-Somoano, and M. R. Martinez-Tarazona, “Phase-mineral and chemical composition of coal fly ashes as a basis for their multicomponent utilization. 1. Characterization of feed coals and fly ashes☆,” Fuel, vol. 82, no. 14, pp. 1793–1811, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. R. M. Zain, C. L. Oh, and L. S. Wee, “Performance of Eco Engineered Cementitious Composites Containing Supplementary Cementitious Materials as a Binder and Recycled Concrete Fines as Fine Aggregate,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 12004. [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Mahakud, S. P. Mishra, R. C. Mohanty, and S. Panda, “Management of construction and demolished waste as an aggregate substitute in cement concrete,” Int. J. Environ. Clim. Chang., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 122–137, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  24. S.-J. Feng, J. Li, Q.-T. Zheng, M.-L. Zhang, Y. Yu, and Y. Zhao, “Utilization potential of waste residue and dust powder from C&D waste,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 19, p. e02513, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Gunasekara, “Influence of properties of fly ash from different sources on the mix design and performance of geopolymer concrete.” RMIT University, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  26. S. V Patankar, Y. M. Ghugal, and S. S. Jamkar, “Mix design of fly ash based geopolymer concrete,” in Advances in structural engineering: Materials, volume three, Springer, 2015, pp. 1619–1634. [Google Scholar]
  27. S. J. Chithambaram, S. Kumar, M. M. Prasad, and D. Adak, “Effect of parameters on the compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymer concrete,” Struct. Concr., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1202–1209, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  28. R. N. Thakur and S. Ghosh, “Effect of mix composition on compressive strength and microstructure of fly ash based geopolymer composites,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 68–74, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Rahmiati, K. A. Azizli, Z. Man, L. Ismail, and M. F. Nuruddin, “Effect of solid/liquid ratio during curing time fly ash based geopolymer on mechanical property,” in Materials science forum, Trans Tech Publ, 2015, pp. 120–124. [Google Scholar]
  30. P. R. J. Quiatchon et al., “Investigation on the compressive strength and time of setting of low-calcium fly ash geopolymer paste using response surface methodology,” Polymers (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 20, p. 3461, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Malazdrewicz et al., “Recycled coarse aggregate sourced from demolition of large panel system buildings: fundamental properties and perspectives for application,” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1–23, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  32. R. Brink and A. Timms, “Weight, Density, Absorption, and Surface Moisture,” in Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete-Making Materials, ASTM International, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  33. M. E. Sosa, C. J. Zega, and Y. A. V. Zaccardi, “A comparative study assessing the validity of water absorption methods when applied to secondary fine aggregates,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 432, p. 136590, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  34. A. A. Raheem, A. A. Soyingbe, and A. J. Emenike, “Effect of curing methods on density and compressive strength of concrete,” Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 3, no. 4, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  35. Z. W. Zhang, W. Wang, L. S. Ma, H. L. Wang, G. J. Pan, and S. Zhang, “Tested and Modeled Relationship between Curing Time and Cube Compressive Strength of Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” Key Eng. Mater., vol. 439, pp. 563–566, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  36. M. PEKGÖZ, M. USLU, and İ. TEKİN, “An In-Situ Study on The Specimen Size Effects on Compressive Strength for Different Strength Concretes,” J. Cem. Based Compos., vol. 3, pp. 7–10, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Kheyroddin, H. Arshadi, and J. Khedri, “The resistance of fiber-reinforced concrete with steel fibers and CFRP to drop-weight impact,” Period. Polytech. Civ. Eng., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 666–676, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  38. X.-C. Zhu, H. Zhu, and H.-R. Li, “Drop-weight impact test on U-shape concrete specimens with statistical and regression analyses,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 5877–5890, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  39. L. Wang, H. Wang, and J. Jia, “Impact resistance of steel-fibre-reinforced lightweight-aggregate concrete,” Mag. Concr. Res., vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 539–547, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  40. A. E. Abdel-Hafez, A. A. Hussein, and S. Bruneau, “Evaluating the ASTM C944 rotating cutters method for determining the abrasion resistance of concrete,” J. Test. Eval., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 4135–4150, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Szala, M. Szafran, W. Macek, S. V. Marchenko, and T. Hejwowski, “Abrasion resistance of S235, S355, C45, AISI 304 and Hardox 500 steels with usage of garnet, corundum and carborundum abrasives,” 2019. [Google Scholar]
  42. A. G. Roberts, Abrasion resistance. ASTM International, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  43. Y.-T. Kim, H.-J. Kim, and C.-S. Jang, “Characteristics of geopolymer based on recycling resources,” J. Korean Cryst. Growth Cryst. Technol., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 152–157, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  44. P. Duan, C. Yan, and W. Zhou, “Compressive strength and microstructure of fly ash based geopolymer blended with silica fume under thermal cycle,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 78, pp. 108–119, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  45. Q. Wang, R. Zhang, H. Xu, M. Li, and Z. Fang, “Study on mechanical properties and microstructure of fly-ash-based geopolymer for solidifying waste mud,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 409, p. 134176, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  46. B. V. Kavyateja and P. N. Reddy, “Effect of Industrial Waste on Strength Properties of Concrete.,” in Annales de Chimie Science des Matériaux, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  47. A. Lawan, A. A. Abbas, and J. Ochepo, “Modeling and Optimization of Concrete Compressive Strength Produced by Replacing Natural Aggregate with Recycled Coarse and Recycled Asphalt Pavement Aggregates,” Saudi J Civ Eng, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 197–206, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  48. J. Junak and N. Stevulova, “Substitution of natural aggregates by crushed concrete waste in concrete products manufacturing,” IJCSCAE, vol. 9, pp. 541–544, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  49. A. O. Mawlod and D. K. H. A. Bzeni, “Mechanical performance of fiber-reinforced slag-based geopolymer composite,” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., vol. 28, no. 3, p. 4023031, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  50. Y. Aygörmez, O. Canpolat, and M. M. Al-Mashhadani, “Assessment of geopolymer composites durability at one year age,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 32, p. 101453, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  51. S. Karthikadevi and R. Saraswathi, “Enhancement of the mechanical properties of a geopolymer concrete due to chemical and microstructural interaction of the binder material,” Silicon, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 3071–3082, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  52. S. Iffat, “Relation between density and compressive strength of hardened concrete,” Concr. Res. Lett., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 182–189, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  53. S. H. Ali, A. L. Kadhim, N. S. Ayoob, and M. L. A. Hussein, “Water abrasion and drop-mass impact of mono and hybrid steel fiber-reinforced reactive powder concrete,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 12118. [Google Scholar]
  54. B. N. M. Rao, C. S. S. Durga, C. Venkatesh, and T. M. Rao, “Sustainable geopolymer concrete for pavements: Performance evaluation of recycled concrete aggregates in fly ash-based mixtures,” J. Sustain. Constr. Mater. Technol., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 211–220, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  55. M. Nazeer, K. Kapoor, and S. P. Singh, “Strength, durability and microstructural properties of geopolymer pervious concrete containing recycled concrete aggregates,” Mag. Concr. Res., vol. 77, no. 7–8, pp. 371–383, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  56. P. Singh and K. Kapoor, “Evaluation of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete incorporating coarse and fine recycled aggregates,” Adv. Cem. Res., pp. 1–14, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  57. A. Sahu, T. Dey, and S. Chakraborty, “Study on the interfacial transition zones of recycled aggregate concrete,” Indian J. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 47, pp. 1–6, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  58. J. Endawati, R. Utami, and R. Rochaeti, “The influence of fly ash and aggregates composition on pervious concrete characteristics,” in Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publ, 2018, pp. 297–302. [Google Scholar]
  59. J. K. Ahmed, P. I. Abdulrahman, N. Atmaca, and G. J. Khoshnaw, “High‐ performance engineered geopolymer composites: A sustainable approach using recycled brick waste,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 142, no. 7, p. e56478, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  60. M. Asadi, A. Nemati, R. Naghizadeh, K. Arzani, and J. Fahim, “Effect of temperature and activator molar of Na2O to SiO2 in the process of synthesis and microstructure of cement geopolymer,” 2013. [Google Scholar]
  61. Z. Zhang, H. Wang, and J. L. Provis, “Quantitative study of the reactivity of fly ash in geopolymerization by FTIR,” J. Sustain. Cem. Mater., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 154–166, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  62. M. Rathee, A. Misra, and J. Kolleboyina, “Study of mechanical properties of geopolymer mortar prepared with fly ash and GGBS,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 93, pp. 377–386, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  63. J. Hwalla, H. El-Hassan, J. J. Assaad, and T. El-Maaddawy, “Durability assessment of geopolymeric and cementitious composites for screed applications,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 87, p. 109037, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  64. A. M. Tahwia, D. S. Aldulaimi, M. Abdellatief, and O. Youssf, “Physical, mechanical and durability properties of eco-friendly engineered geopolymer composites,” Infrastructures, vol. 9, no. 11, p. 191, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  65. S. Thokchom, P. Ghosh, and S. Ghosh, “Effect of water absorption, porosity and sorptivity on durability of geopolymer mortars,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 28–32, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  66. M. M. Abdullah, E. E. Hekal, and E. Kishar, “Physico-Chemical and Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Materials,” J. Sci. Res. Sci., vol. 35, no. part 1, pp. 506–516, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  67. B. Umesh, “Mechanical and durability properties of standard and high strength geopolymer concrete using particle packing theory,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 400, p. 132722, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  68. F. Chen, J. Zhao, H. Zhong, Y. Feng, C. Chen, and J. Xie, “An investigation of the durability of ultra-lightweight high-strength geopolymeric composites,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 80, p. 107990, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  69. Z. F. Farhana, H. Kamarudin, A. Rahmat, and A. M. M. Al Bakri, “The relationship between water absorption and porosity for geopolymer paste,” in Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publ, 2015, pp. 166–172. [Google Scholar]
  70. L. Basheer and D. J. Cleland, “Durability and water absorption properties of surface treated concretes,” Mater. Struct., vol. 44, pp. 957–967, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  71. A. Dubey and S. Chithiraputhiran, “Freeze-thaw durable geopolymer compositions and methods for making same.” Google Patents, Apr. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  72. R. Po, “Water-absorbent polymers: a patent survey,” J. Macromol. Sci. Part C Polym. Rev., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 607–662, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  73. M. N. Akhtar, A. M. Al-Shamrani, M. Jameel, N. A. Khan, Z. Ibrahim, and J. N. Akhtar, “Stability and permeability characteristics of porous asphalt pavement: An experimental case study,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 15, p. e00591, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  74. A. U. Dani and D. Tahir, “Geopolymer Innovation in Construction: Environmentally Friendly and Sustainable Materials,” Al-Khazini J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 3, no. 2, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  75. M. Rupa, V. M. Rao, and K. Sethy, “Optimizing Geopolymer Concrete Properties through Red Mud and Fly Ash with Recycled Water for Sustainable Construction,” in Sustainable Materials, Structures and IoT, CRC Press, pp. 252–255. [Google Scholar]
  76. R. Shanmugam, R. Selvapriya, M. Jamuna, and M. Gopinath, “A study on high calcium flyash blended geopolymer composite with industrial derivatives,” Matéria (Rio Janeiro), vol. 29, no. 4, p. e20240646, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  77. C. M. M. de Souza, B. C. Mendes, L. G. Pedroti, and C. M. F. Vieira, “Evaluation of Geopolymer Composites, Based on Red Mud and Metakaolin, for Building Application,” in TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition, Springer, 2024, pp. 421–430. [Google Scholar]
  78. C. A. Jeyasehar, G. Saravanan, A. K. Ramakrishnan, and S. Kandasamy, “Strength and durability studies on fly ash based geopolymer bricks,” 2013. [Google Scholar]
  79. G. C. Reddy and K. H. K. Reddy, “Strength and Durability Studies of Geo-Polymer Concrete in the presence of Marine Water,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2023, p. 12022. [Google Scholar]
  80. G. S. Mallika, S. Somasundaram, and K. A. Ramasamy, “A review on recent development in geopolymer composites,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  81. A.-V. Lăzărescu, A. Hegyi, A. Csapai, and F. Popa, “The Influence of Different Aggregates on the Physico-Mechanical Performance of Alkali-Activated Geopolymer Composites Produced Using Romanian Fly Ash,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 485, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  82. A. A. Ali, T. S. Al-Attar, and W. A. Abbas, “A statistical model to predict the strength development of geopolymer concrete based on SiO2/Al2O3 ratio variation,” Civ. Eng. J., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 454–471, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  83. P. Kaur, J. Stoltzfus, and V. Yellapu, “Descriptive statistics,” Int. J. Acad. Med., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 60–63, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  84. M. J. Fisher and A. P. Marshall, “Understanding descriptive statistics,” Aust. Crit. care, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 93–97, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  85. H. Abdi, “Coefficient of variation,” Encycl. Res. Des., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 169–171, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  86. J. A. Canchola, S. Tang, P. Hemyari, E. Paxinos, and E. Marins, “Correct use of percent coefficient of variation (% CV) formula for log-transformed data,” MOJ Proteom. Bioinform, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 10–15406, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  87. V. T. Phan and T. H. Nguyen, “The influence of fly ash on the compressive strength of recycled concrete utilizing coarse aggregates from demolition works,” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 7107–7110, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  88. Š. Slanička, “The influence of fly ash fineness on the strength of concrete,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 285–296, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  89. R. Siddique, “Performance characteristics of high-volume Class F fly ash concrete,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 487–493, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  90. Y. Yilmaz, T. Çakmak, and Z. Kurt, “ANOVA method reveals key factors influencing geopolymer strength: a comprehensive evaluation of input variables,” in 2023 7th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Smart Technologies (ISAS), IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  91. A. S. Rahman, “Effects of nanofibers on properties of geopolymer composites,” in Nanotechnology in eco-efficient construction, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 123–140. [Google Scholar]
  92. L. St and S. Wold, “Analysis of variance (ANOVA),” Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 259–272, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  93. G. Görhan, “The evaluation with anova of the effect of lime admixture and thermal cure time on fly ash paste activated with sodium silicate solution,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 94, pp. 228–234, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  94. T. Krishnan and R. Purushothaman, “Optimization and influence of parameter affecting the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete containing recycled concrete aggregate: using full factorial design approach,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2017, p. 12013. [Google Scholar]
  95. M. F. Nuruddin, S. Demie, and N. Shafiq, “Effect of mix composition on workability and compressive strength of self-compacting geopolymer concrete,” Can. J. Civ. Eng., vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1196–1203, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  96. S. Sharma, “Abrasion Resistance of Geopolymer Concrete with the Change in Curing Time and Curing Temperature,” Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res., pp. 2250–3005, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  97. J. Bhavsar and V. R. Panchal, “High temperature and abrasion resistance of fly ash and ceramic waste powder based geopolymer mortar,” 2024. [Google Scholar]
  98. E. Ozcelikci, E. Ozdogru, M. S. Tugluca, H. Ilcan, and M. Sahmaran, “Comprehensive investigation of performance of construction and demolition waste based wood fiber reinforced geopolymer composites,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 84, p. 108682, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  99. H. U. Ahmed, A. S. Mohammed, S. M. A. Qaidi, R. H. Faraj, N. Hamah Sor, and A. A. Mohammed, “Compressive strength of geopolymer concrete composites: a systematic comprehensive review, analysis and modeling,” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1383–1428, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  100. K. Hemra, T. Kobayashi, P. Aungkavattana, and S. Jiemsirilers, “Enhanced mechanical and thermal properties of fly ash-based geopolymer composites by wollastonite reinforcement,” J. Met. Mater. Miner., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 13–25, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  101. C. Wang, Q. Tian, M. Ruan, Z. Zhao, and J. Cai, “Synergistic effect of recycled powder and waste glass powder on the properties of cement paste,” Mengyue Zhao, Zhiyong xu, gelong Cai, Jiwei, Synerg. Eff. Recycl. Powder Waste Glas. Powder Prop. Cem. Paste. [Google Scholar]
  102. A. Ocelić, A. Baričević, and M. F. Smrkić, “Synergistic integration of waste fibres and supplementary cementitious materials to enhance sustainability of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC),” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 20, p. e02772, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  103. N. S. D. M. Azhar, F. F. Zainal, and M. M. A. B. Abdullah, “Effect of geopolymer paste on compressive strength, water absorption and porosity,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  104. L. Kidalova, N. Stevulova, and E. Terpakova, “Influence of water absorption on the selected properties of hemp hurds composites,” Pollack Period., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 123–132, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  105. N. Duran, A. Paula Lemes, and A. B. Seabra, “Review of cellulose nanocrystals patents: preparation, composites and general applications,” Recent Pat. Nanotechnol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 16–28, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  106. G. F. Huseien, Z. Kubba, A. M. Mhaya, N. H. Malik, and J. Mirza, “Impact resistance enhancement of sustainable geopolymer composites using high volume tile ceramic wastes,” J. Compos. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 73, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  107. L. Periyasamy and V. Nagarajan, “Transforming waste into sustainable building materials: Properties and environmental impacts of geopolymer concrete with recycled concrete aggregates,” Glob. NEST J., vol. 26, no. 2, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  108. M. Karagöz, O. Canpolat, M. M. Al-mashhadani, Y. Aygörmez, and M. Uysal, “Abrasion resistance and strength properties of non-fibrous and steel fiber reinforced mortars with different aggregates,” J. Sustain. Constr. Mater. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 221–229, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  109. E. Abuowda, H. El-Hassan, and T. El-Maaddawy, “Characterization of Geopolymer Masonry Mortars Incorporating Recycled Fine Aggregates,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 18, p. 8147, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  110. A. Scherbakov, E. Lukashuk, M. Subbotina, and O. Karnaukhova, “Environmental Impact Assessment of Construction Waste-Based Composites,” in Proceedings of ECSF 2021: Engineering, Construction, and Infrastructure Solutions for Innovative Medicine Facilities, Springer, 2022, pp. 293–302. [Google Scholar]
  111. L. A. López Ruiz, “Implementation and evaluation of the circular economy model in the construction and demolition waste sector,” 2021. [Google Scholar]
  112. K. Baziene, J. Gargasas, S. Rajendran, and J. N. Solomon, “TOWARDS CIRCULAR ECONOMY THROUGH NOVEL WASTE RECYCLING TECHNOLOGIES.,” J. Entrep. Sustain. Issues, vol. 12, no. 2, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  113. Н. М. Левченко, О. М. Назаренко, А. О. Березовська, П. В. Бєлоусова, М. В. Щемелєв, and А. А. Гаджівердієв, “ІННОВАЦІЙНІ ТЕХНОЛОГІЇ В УПРАВЛІННІ БУДІВЕЛЬНИМИ ВІДХОДАМИ ЗГІДНО ЕКОНОМІКИ ЗАМКНУТОГО ЦИКЛУ,” Науковий вісник будівництва, no. 110, pp. 62–69, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  114. M. Z. U. Haq, H. Sood, R. Kumar, and L. Ricciotti, “Sustainable geopolymers from polyethylene terephthalate waste and industrial by-products: a comprehensive characterisation and performance predictions,” J. Mater. Sci., vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 3858–3889, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  115. M. Z. U. Haq, H. Sood, R. Kumar, and I. Merta, “Taguchi-optimized triple-aluminosilicate geopolymer bricks with recycled sand: A sustainable construction solution,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 20, p. e02780, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  116. J. L. Provis, “Modelling the Formation of Geopolymers Modelling the Formation of Geopolymers,” Univ. Melb., 2006. [Google Scholar]
  117. M. Spanou et al., “Investigation of the Geopolymerization Potential of a Waste Silica-Rich Diabase Mud,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 9, p. 3189, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  118. A. Fernandez-Jimenez, I. Garcia-Lodeiro, and A. Palomo, “Development of new cementitious caterials by alkaline activating industrial by-products,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, 2015, p. 12005. [Google Scholar]
  119. J. L. Provis, A. Fernández-Jiménez, E. Kamseu, C. Leonelli, and A. Palomo, “Binder chemistry–low-calcium alkali-activated materials,” in Alkali activated materials: state-of-the-Art report, RILEM TC 224-AAM, Springer, 2013, pp. 93–123. [Google Scholar]
  120. N. S. Sekhar and P. N. Raghunath, “Influence of water binder ratio on high performance concrete,” Open Constr. Build. Technol. J., vol. 8, no. 1, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  121. A. M. Mansor, R. P. Borg, A. M. M. Hamed, M. M. Gadeem, and M. M. Saeed, “The effects of water-cement ratio and chemical admixtures on the workability of concrete,” in IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, IOP Publishing, 2018, p. 12017. [Google Scholar]
  122. J. Hwalla, J. Bawab, H. El-Hassan, F. Abu Obaida, and T. El-Maaddawy, “Scientometric analysis of global research on the utilization of geopolymer composites in construction applications,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 14, p. 11340, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  123. Y. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Gamil, B. Iftikhar, and H. Murtaza, “Towards modern sustainable construction materials: a bibliographic analysis of engineered geopolymer composites,” Front. Mater., vol. 10, p. 1277567, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  124. A. Alaskar, M. S. Mahmood, O. Zaid, F. Althoey, and M. M. Arbili, “Systematic review on geopolymer composites modified with nanomaterials and thin films: Enhancing performance and sustainability in construction,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 409, p. 133888, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  125. P. Azarsa, R. Gupta, and A. Biparva, “Inventive microstructural and durability investigation of cementitious composites involving crystalline waterproofing admixtures and portland limestone cement,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 6, p. 1425, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  126. M. Arabi and S. Wild, “Microstructural development in cured soil-lime composites,” J. Mater. Sci., vol. 21, pp. 497–503, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  127. C. Cazan and M. Cosnita, “Sustainable composites with synergistic combinations of construction and demolition waste: Behavior of rubber, HDPE, PS, and brick after short-term water immersion,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 471, p. 143342, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  128. P. Klieger, “Durability studies at the Portland cement association,” in Durability of Building Materials and Components, ASTM International, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  129. C. Chastre, P. Faria, J. Neves, M. Ludovico-Marques, H. Biscaia, and L. Nunes, “Testing durability on construction materials,” in Advances on testing and experimentation in civil engineering: Materials, structures and buildings, Springer, 2023, pp. 29–51. [Google Scholar]
  130. P. Anand, S. D. Singh, P. N. Bhowmik, and D.-P. N. Kontoni, “Optimizing concrete mix proportions with zeolite, GGBS, and CDW: a data-driven approach integrating experimental analysis and machine learning models,” Eng. Res. Express, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 15105, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  131. F. Chen et al., “Advancing concrete mix proportion through hybrid intelligence: A multi-objective optimization approach,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 19, p. 6448, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  132. S. H. Kim and S.-J. Park, “Effect of graphene oxide on interfacial interactions and fracture toughness of basalt fiber-reinforced epoxy composites,” J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 6760–6767, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  133. C. Su, X. Wang, and Z. Wu, “Enhancement of Mechanical Properties of FRP Composites with Silica Nanoparticles,” in 10th International Conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering: Proceedings of CICE 2020/2021 10, Springer, 2022, pp. 684–694. [Google Scholar]
  134. Y. Li and Q. Li, “Life Cycle Assessment of Plant Fiber Reinforced Composites,” in Plant Fiber Reinforced Composites, Springer, 2022, pp. 195–216. [Google Scholar]
  135. C. Zhang, “Life cycle assessment (LCA) of fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) composites in civil applications,” in Eco-efficient construction and building materials, Elsevier, 2014, pp. 565–591. [Google Scholar]
  136. A. E. Sorokin, S. N. Bulychev, and S. I. Gorbachev, “Environmental impact of polymer composites,” Russ. Eng. Res., vol. 41, pp. 53–55, 2021. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.