EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 356 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 356 (2026) 02012 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 356, 2026
5th International Conference on Condensed Matter and Applied Physics (ICC 2025)
Article Number 02012
Number of page(s) 11
Section Applied Physics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635602012
Published online 05 March 2026
  1. Hohenwarter M and Fuchs K 2004 Combination of Dynamic Geometry, Algebra, and Calculus in the Software System Geogebra (2004) [Google Scholar]
  2. Ridha M R and Pramiarsih E E 2020 The Use of Geogebra Software in Learning Geometry Transformation to Improve Students' Mathematical Understanding Ability In Journal of Physics: Conference Series vol 1477 (IOP Publishing) pp 042048 [Google Scholar]
  3. Condori A P, Velazco D J M and Fernandez R.A 2020 November Geogebra as a Technological Tool in the Process of Teaching and Learning Geometry In Conference on Information and Communication Technologies of Ecuador (Springer, Cham) pp 258–271 [Google Scholar]
  4. Kusumah Y S, Kustiawati D, and Herman T 2020 The Effect of Geogebra in Three- [Google Scholar]
  5. Dimensional Geometry Learning on Students' Mathematical Communication Ability Int. J. Instr. 13 895–908 [Google Scholar]
  6. Septian, A, Inayah S, Suwarman R.F and Nugraha R. 2020 August Geogebra-Assisted Problem Based Learning to Improve Mathematical Problem Solving Ability In SEMANTIK Conference of Mathematics Education (SEMANTIK 2019) (Atlantis Press) pp 67–71 [Google Scholar]
  7. Jelatu S 2018 Effect of Geogebra-Aided REACT Strategy on Understanding of Geometry Concepts Int. J. Instr. 11 325–336 [Google Scholar]
  8. Zakaria E and Lee L.S 2012 Teacher's perceptions toward the use of Geogebra in the teaching and learning of Mathematics J. Math. Stat. 8 253–257 [Google Scholar]
  9. Shadaan P and Leong K.E 2013 Effectiveness of Using Geogebra on Students' Understanding in Learning Circles Malaysian Online J. Educ. Technol. 1 1–11 [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Dlabač and A. Milovanović, 'Using Moodle Platform in Evaluating the Electrical Engineering Practices', presented at the Technics and Informatics in Education, 8th International Scientific Conference, Proceedings of full papers, 2020, pp. 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Martín-Blas and A. Serrano-Fernández, 'The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics', Comput. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Basilaia and D. Kvavadze, 'Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia.', Pedagog. Res., vol. 5, no. 4, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Dlabac, A. Milovanovic, B. Koprivica, M. Calasan, and M. Janjic, 'Evaluation of internet-based practical teaching in higher education', in International scientific conference - UNITECH 2019, Gabrovo, Bulgaria, Nov. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. N. Indranata, S. Priyanto, and A. Kharsyah, 'The effect of the use of geogebra on problem-solving functions and curve skills in engineering mathematics learning', J. Educ. Vocat. Future, vol. 1, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Oct. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Majerek, 'Application of GeoGebra for teaching mathematics', Adv.Sci. Technol. Res. J., vol. 8, no. 24, pp. 51–54, Nov. 2014, doi:10.12913/22998624/567. [Google Scholar]
  16. R. C. Kushwaha, P. K. Chaurasia, and A. Singhal, 'Impact on Students' Achievement in Teaching Mathematics Using Geogebra', in 2014 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Technology for Education, Dec. 2014, pp. 134–137. doi: 10.1109/T4E.2014.54. [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Kllogjeri and A. Kllogjeri, 'Geogebra for Solving Problems of Physics', in Organizational, Business, and Technological Aspects of the Knowledge Society, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 424–428. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-16324-150. [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Macangus-Gerrard, 'Chapter 2-Alternating Current Synchronous Generators', in Offshore Electrical Engineering Manual (Second Edition), G. Macangus-Gerrard, Ed. Boston: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2018, pp. 35–42. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385499-5.00004-2. [Google Scholar]
  19. K. A. Stroud with additions by Dexter J., Engineering Mathematics, Fifth Edition, International Edition. Hampshire, England: Ltd, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  20. Maniyar KG, Ingole DS. Multi-response optimization of EDM process parameters for aluminium hybrid composites by GRA. Mater Today Proc. 2018; 5:1983643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.347. [Google Scholar]
  21. Maniyar KG, Ingole DS. Investigation of EDM process parameters for hybrid metal matrix composites. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2018; 377:012204. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012204. [Google Scholar]
  22. Maniyar KG, Ingole DS. Mathematical modelling and optimization of EDM process parameters for aluminium hybrid composites. Mater Today Proc. 2018; 5:27700–27709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.004. [Google Scholar]
  23. Maniyar KG, Ingole DS. Influence of EDM control factors for aluminium hybrid Composites. Lect Notes Multidiscipl Indust Eng. 2018; 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76276-0_27. [Google Scholar]
  24. Maniyar KG. An experimental analysis of aluminium hybrid metal matrix composites, Mater Today Proc. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2024.01.021. [Google Scholar]
  25. Maniyar KG, Marode RV, Chikalthankar SB. Optimization of EDM process parameters on MRR and TWR of Tungsten Carbide by Taguchi method. Int J Eng Adv Technol. 2016; 5:112–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2024.01.021. [Google Scholar]
  26. Maniyar KG. Analysis of EDM process parameters on material removal rate of WC. 2nd Nat Conf Recent Inno Sci Eng. 2017; 5(9):37–39. [Google Scholar]
  27. Maniyar KG, Agrawal SK, Ingole DS. Optimization of multiple performance characteristics in EDM: A critical literature review. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng. 2016; 5(10):27–33. [Google Scholar]
  28. Maniyar KG, Deore HV. Design and testing of carbon fiber composite material with comparative analysis. Int Res J Eng Tech. 2020; 7(8):1120–1122. [Google Scholar]
  29. Maniyar KG, Ingole DS. Current research development in machining of hybrid metal matrix composites: A review. Int J Recent Innov Trends Comput Commun. 2016; 4(7):150–154. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jadhav PA et al. Evaluation and characterization of aluminium silicon carbide. Metal Matrix Composites. AIP Conf Proc. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227945 [Google Scholar]
  31. Maniyar K, et al. An experimental study of process parameters for nano composites. NanoWorld J. 2024; 10(S1):S209–211. https://doi.org/10.17756/nwj.2024-s1-037. [Google Scholar]
  32. Maniyar K, et al. Effect of nano-lubricants on journal bearing for performance enhancement. NanoWorld J. 2024; 10(S1):S206–208. https://doi.org/10.17756/nwj.2024-s1-036. [Google Scholar]
  33. Maniyar K, Suhane S. Parametric analysis of electric discharge machining for nano composites. NanoWorld J. 2024; 10(S1):S63–65. https://doi.org/10.17756/nwj.2024-s1-012 [Google Scholar]
  34. Maniyar K, et al. The comprehensive study for machining of metal matrix composites. AIP Conf Proc. 2024; 3196:040005. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227955 [Google Scholar]
  35. Maniyar K, et al. An extensive study of mechanical properties and tribological characteristics for hybrid composites. AIP Conf Proc. 2024; 3203:030038. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0224994 [Google Scholar]
  36. Maniyar K et al. The comprehensive study of synthesis and characterization of hybrid nano fluids. AIP Conf Proc. 2024; 3149:030048. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0224988 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ghutepatil PR, et al. A critical review of nanotechnology in various fields of engineering. AIP Conf Proc. 2024; 3149:030002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0224984 [Google Scholar]
  38. Thamke V, et al. Seismic performance and cost analysis of AAC blocks vs. fly ash bricks: A comparative study utilizing STAAD pro. AIP Conf Proc. 2024;3196:060006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227895 [Google Scholar]
  39. Banarase S, et al. Evaluation of concrete building strengthening through nondestructive testing methods - A case study. AIP Conf Proc. 2024; 3196:040001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227927 [Google Scholar]
  40. Maniyar K, et al. An experimental investigation of machining parameters on aluminium composites. J Polym Compos. 2024; 12(06):8–13. [Google Scholar]
  41. Maniyar K, Harsur S. Experimental findings of the EDM process parameters for metal matrix composites. J Polym Compos. 2024; 12(06):14–18. [Google Scholar]
  42. Saravade N et al. Study on heavy machinery utilizing the most recent technologies for excavation of road construction and mining. J Mines Mets Fuels. 2024; 72(7):667–673. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2024/45327 [Google Scholar]
  43. Patil GH, et al. Study on prediction of lightning impulses on transmission line tower due to harsh field and variable working condition, environmental condition and tower footing resistances. J Mines Mets Fuels. 2024; 72(7):763–769. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2024/45322 [Google Scholar]
  44. Jathar A, et al.. An extensive study of nanomaterial and nanotechnology in the various fields of engineering. J Mines Mets Fuels. 2024; 72(10):1067–1074. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2024/45658 [Google Scholar]
  45. Nawghare B, et al. An extensive study of nano fluids and their applications in real life. J Mines Met Fuels. 2024; 72(10):1119–1124. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2024/45407 [Google Scholar]
  46. Raut P, et al. A comprehensive analysis of the synthesis, properties and uses of nanofluid. J Mines Met Fuels. 2024; 72(9):965–971. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2024/45524 [Google Scholar]
  47. Warghat S, et al. An extensive study of metal matrix composites and their various properties for different uses. J Mines Met Fuels. 2024; 72(9):949–955. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2024/45554 [Google Scholar]
  48. Mali C, et al. An analysis of nanoparticles in composite materials. J Mines Met Fuels. 2024; 72(11):1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2024/45579. [Google Scholar]
  49. Patil G, et al. Four-quadrant operation of induction motor using H-bridge in harsh and noxious environment, field with dust, voltage fluctuation and major load variations. J Mines Met Fuels. 2024; 72(11):1225–1231. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2024/45557 [Google Scholar]
  50. Mhaske M, et al. The role of linear algebra in developing machine learning solutions. 3rd International Conference for Advancement in Technology (ICONAT), GOA, India. 2024;1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONAT61936.2024.10775140. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ansari S, et al. A comprehensive study on modern electronic technologies in the field-based engineering industry. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(2):455–465. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/47122 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ghodke B, et al. Using GeoGebra and SageMath to assist engineering students in tracing different curves and solving numerical methods, communications on applied nonlinear analysis. 2025; 32(6). https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v32.3310. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kakade N et al. Thermal analytical characterization of Gymnema sylvestre using TGA- DTA technique, Communications on applied nonlinear analysis. 2025; 32(6). https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v32.3492. [Google Scholar]
  54. Maniyar K et al. An analysis of machining parameters for metal matrix composite. J Polym Comp. 2025; 13(02):76–85. [Google Scholar]
  55. Mishra E et al. Case study on role of solar energy in greenhouse gas emissions reduction in India, J Info Syst Eng Manage. 2025; 10(19):462–471. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i19s.3058. [Google Scholar]
  56. Patil S, et al. The role of internet of things, cloud computing, artificial intelligence and robotics in the fourth industrial revolution. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/47334 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mishra E, et al. Analysis of impact of STATCOM on distance relay using MATLAB. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(3):743–750. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/48052 [Google Scholar]
  58. Choudhari RM et al. Determinant factors for the development of rural entrepreneurship. J Inform Syst Eng. 2025; 10(25):111–118. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i25s.3951. [Google Scholar]
  59. Patil G, et al. DTMF phone call control home appliance using Arduino and GSM module and home automation, J Inform Syst Eng. 2025; 10(25):249–257. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i25s.3976 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kadam J, et al. Offline signature verification using Siamese neural network, J Inform Syst Eng. 2025; 10(26s):431–439. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i26s.4245. [Google Scholar]
  61. Garad RN, et al. An extensive study on the optimized piston bowl with spiral grooves for the CI engine. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(5):1389–1394. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/48016 [Google Scholar]
  62. Choudhari RM, et al. An analysis of tensile strength and performance of resistance spot welding parameters for HSLA 355 stainless steel. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(5):1409–1418. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/48684 [Google Scholar]
  63. Warke PS et al. Wet scrubber system for exhaust gas emission reduction. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(5):1331–1341. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/48623 [Google Scholar]
  64. Maniyar K et al. An experimental performance of EDM process parameters for aluminium composites. In: Joseph DPVJ, Thangaraju K, editors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Multifunctional Materials and Devices for Sustainable Technologies. IEMDST 2024. Singapore: Springer; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-5863-3_44. [Google Scholar]
  65. Maniyar K et al. Investing experimental effect of welding parameters in friction stir welding on aluminium alloy. In: Joseph DPVJ, Thangaraju K, editors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Multifunctional Materials and Devices for Sustainable Technologies. IEMDST 2024. Singapore: Springer; 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-5863-3_45. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kulkarni H et al.The hybrid PSO-ANN methodology for enhancing net load prediction in modern power systems. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(6):1833–1838. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/4910473. [Google Scholar]
  67. Kulkarni H et al. Design of an Intelligent PLC-based protection for power transformers with auto-re-closer. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(7):1915–1923. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/49137 [Google Scholar]
  68. Kulkarni H et al. The role of electric vehicles in a sustainable future and environment. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(7):1925–1933. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/49119 [Google Scholar]
  69. Patil G et al. Comprehensive analysis of solar photovoltaic system power inverter topologies. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(7):1935–1943. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/49149 [Google Scholar]
  70. Mukadam S et al. A comprehensive study on challenges in gear manufacturing using fused deposition modelling. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(7):1973–1985. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/49194 [Google Scholar]
  71. Chimkode S et al. Recent advancements in the field of nanotechnology using artificial intelligence, data science and machine learning. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(7):1987–1994. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/49272 [Google Scholar]
  72. Pawar N et al. Optimization of multi-cylinder four-stroke SI engine performance under magnetic field interference using CNG fuel. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(7):2009–2013. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/49144 [Google Scholar]
  73. Mahamulkar V et al. Dynamic wireless power transmission system for EV. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(7):2155–2161. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/49252 [Google Scholar]
  74. Lodha K et al. Innovative algorithms for state-of-charge estimation in electric vehicle batteries. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(7):2207–2220. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/49439 [Google Scholar]
  75. Warbhe R et al. The role of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology in mining industries and other fields. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(7):2233–2240. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/49174 [Google Scholar]
  76. Banarase S et al. An experimental investigation of process parameters for aluminium alloy composites. J Polym Compos. 2025; 13(04) [Google Scholar]
  77. Maniyar K, et al. Comparative study of hybrid vehicles with traditional vehicles. Green Technology and Smart Materials for Engineering Applications, CRC Press; 2025. p. 385–396. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kakade N et al. Examining experimentally the impact of spot-welding process variables on metal matrix composites. J Polym Compos. 2025; 13(05) https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2025/view=221853. [Google Scholar]
  79. Kharche N et al.Optimisation and analysis of laser cutting parameters for AISI 304 stainless steel: Enhancing cut quality and surface roughness. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(8):2321–2337. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/49219 [Google Scholar]
  80. Bugade V et al.Electrical Power Theft Detection and Monitoring Using Innovative Technique. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(8):2361–2370. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/49237 [Google Scholar]
  81. Suhane S et al. The role of nano materials in the numerous areas of manufacturing. J Mines Met Fuels. 2025; 73(8):2639–2648. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/47375 [Google Scholar]
  82. Chopade, P et al. (2025). An Experimental Examination of Concrete for Seven and Twenty-Eight Days of Cement Mortar Recursion. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 73(10), 3055–3065. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2025/48741 [Google Scholar]
  83. P. Jadhav et al. "The Impact of Fillet Radius on Spur Gears Made from Aluminum-Silicon Carbide Metal Matrix Composite," 2025 4th International Conference on Innovative Mechanisms for Industry Applications (ICIMIA), Tirupur, India, 2025, pp. 320–324, doi: 10.1109/ICIMIA67127.2025.11200982. [Google Scholar]
  84. Harsur, S. et al. (2024). Machinability of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Silicon Carbide Composite Material—A Review. In: Pawar, P.M., et al. Techno-Societal 2022. ICATSA 2022. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34648-4_37 [Google Scholar]
  85. Waware, S. et al. (2024). A Critical Review of Recent Research on the Application of Nanofluids in Heat Exchanger. In: Pawar, P.M., et al. Techno-Societal 2022. ICATSA 2022. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34648-4_86 [Google Scholar]
  86. Kurhade A. et al. (2024). Wind Rose Analysis of Temperature Variation with Sensor Implantation Technique for Wind Turbine. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 122(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.122.1.118 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.