Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 358, 2026
EFM25 – Energy & Fluid Mechanics 2025
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635801013
Published online 12 March 2026
  1. V. Palladino et al. “Preliminary studies of a regional aircraft with hydrogen-based hybrid propulsion”. In: AIAA aviation 2021 forum. 2021, p. 2411. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Voskuijl, J. Van Bogaert, and A. G. Rao. “Analy-sis and design of hybrid electric regional turboprop aircraft”. In: CEAS Aeronautical Journal 9 (2018), pp. 15–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Krus, I. Staack, and A. Olivieira. “Hybrid electric propulsion system optimization for a commuter air-craft”. In: 33th Congress of the International Coun-cil of the Aeronautical Sciences Stockholm, Sweden. ICAS. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. W. J. Coupe and S. Saxena. Towards Sustainable Aviation With Efficient Airspace Operations. Tech. rep. International Council of the Aeronautical Sci-ences, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Doff-Sotta, M. Cannon, and M. Bacic. “Optimal energy management for hybrid electric aircraft”. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine 53.2 (2020), pp. 6043–6049. [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Xie et al. “Convexification in energy optimiza-tion of a hybrid electric propulsion system for aerial vehicles”. In: Aerospace Science and Technology 123 (2022), p. 107509. [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Ji et al. “Energy and configuration manage-ment strategy for battery/fuel cell/jet engine hy-brid propulsion and power systems on aircraft”. In: Energy Conversion and Management 225 (2020), p. 113393. [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Kumar et al. “Airplane flight route optimization problem with multi-constraints”. In: 2022 Second International Conference on Advances in Electri-cal, Computing, Communication and Sustainable Technologies (ICAECT). IEEE. 2022, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Ho-Huu et al. “An optimization framework for route design and allocation of aircraft to multiple departure routes”. In: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 76 (2019), pp. 273–288. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Hartjes and H. Visser. “Efficient trajectory pa-rameterization for environmental optimization of departure flight paths using a genetic algorithm”. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical En-gineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 231.6 (2017), pp. 1115–1123. [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Vergnes et al. “Environmental impact optimisa-tion of flight plans in a fixed and free route net-work”. In: ICRAT 2022. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. P. Fanti et al. “Flight path optimization for mini-mizing emissions and avoiding weather hazard”. In: 2014 American Control Conference. IEEE. 2014, pp. 4567–4572. [Google Scholar]
  13. N. K. Wickramasinghe, Y. Nakamura, and A. Senoguchi. “Estimating the Impact of Numerical Weather Prediction Data Models on Short-Haul Minimum Cost Tracks”. In: 34th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS 2024. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Enea et al. “Comparing Convective Weather Impacts on Air Traffic Management Operations in United States, Canada & Europe”. In: 34th Congress of the International Council of the Aero-nautical Sciences, ICAS 2024. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Nakamura and A. Senoguchi. “Relationships Between Aircraft Routes And Turbulence-Related Weather Data”. In: (2024). [Google Scholar]
  16. K. A. Buchtal et al. “Route planning for volcanic ash and radioactivity in-situ drone measurements using a genetic algorithm and kriging”. In: 34th Congress of the International Council of the Aero-nautical Sciences, ICAS 2024. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Borgna et al. “Integrating Eco-Efficient Flight Planning In Aircraft Conceptual Design: Minimal NOx Routes For High-Speed Aircraft Using Hydro-gen”. In: (2024). [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Filippone and Z. Mohamed-Kassim. “Multi-disciplinary simulation of propeller-turboprop air-craft flight”. In: The Aeronautical Journal 116.1184 (2012), pp. 985–1014. [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Filippone. Advanced aircraft flight performance. Vol. 34. Cambridge University Press, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. G. Cuccu et al. “A data-driven approach to pre-dict NOx-emissions of gas turbines”. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE. 2017, pp. 1283–1288. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. S. A. Neto et al. “Development of a predictive emissions monitoring system using hybrid models with industrial data”. In: Computer Aided Chemi-cal Engineering. Vol. 51. Elsevier, 2022, pp. 1387–1392. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Dirik. “Prediction of NOx emissions from gas turbines of a combined cycle power plant using an ANFIS model optimized by GA”. In: Fuel 321 (2022), p. 124037. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Khurana et al. “Predictive modeling of engine emissions using machine learning: A review”. In: Materials Today: Proceedings 38 (2021), pp. 280–284. [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Rivard, M. Trudeau, and K. Zaghib. “Hydrogen storage for mobility: a review”. In: Materials 12.12 (2019), p. 1973. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. C. Cameretti et al. “Modeling and investigation of a turboprop hybrid electric propulsion system”. In: Aerospace 5.4 (2018), p. 123. [Google Scholar]
  26. V. Palladino et al. “Optimization of a hydrogen-based hybrid propulsion system under aircraft per-formance constraints”. In: Chinese Journal of Aero-nautics 36.5 (2023), pp. 41–56. [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Pornet et al. “Methodology for sizing and per-formance assessment of hybrid energy aircraft”. In: Journal of Aircraft 52.1 (2015), pp. 341–352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. G. M. Bravo, N. Praliyev, and Á. Veress. “Perfor-mance analysis of hybrid electric and distributed propulsion system applied on a light aircraft”. In: Energy 214 (2021), p. 118823. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. C. E. Riboldi, F. Gualdoni, and L. Trainelli. “Pre-liminary weight sizing of light pure-electric and hybrid-electric aircraft”. In: Transportation Re-search Procedia 29 (2018), pp. 376–389. [Google Scholar]
  30. R. De Vries, M. Brown, and R. Vos. “Prelimi-nary sizing method for hybrid-electric distributed-propulsion aircraft”. In: Journal of Aircraft 56.6 (2019), pp. 2172–2188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. C. A. Snyder and M. T. Tong. “Modeling turboshaft engines for the revolutionary vertical lift technology project”. In: Annual Forum and Technology Dis-play: The Future of Vertical Flight. GRC-E-DAA-TN66991. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Oh, D.-S. Cho, and T.-W. Kim. “Design and evaluation of hybrid propulsion ship powered by fuel cell and bottoming cycle”. In: Interna-tional Journal of Hydrogen Energy 48.22 (2023), pp. 8273–8285. [Google Scholar]
  33. D. D.-T. V. Pham, C. Recine, and R. H. Jansen. “Sizing and Performance Analysis of a MW-Class Electrified Aircraft Propulsion (EAP) System for a Parallel Hybrid Turboprop Concept”. In: 34th Congress of the International Council of the Aero-nautical Sciences (ICAS). 2024. [Google Scholar]
  34. L. Alberti and D. Troncon. “Design of electric mo-tors and power drive systems according to effi-ciency standards”. In: IEEE Transactions on Indus-trial Electronics 68.10 (2020), pp. 9287–9296. [Google Scholar]
  35. N. Ivanov et al. “Electric machines with high spe-cific power”. In: Russian Electrical Engineering 93.10 (2022), pp. 621–630. [Google Scholar]
  36. T. El Hajji et al. “Optimal design of high spe-cific power electric machines for fully electric re-gional aircraft: A case study of 1mw s-pmsm”. In: Aerospace 11.10 (2024), p. 820. [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Inoue and H. Akagi. “A bidirectional isolated DC–DC converter as a core circuit of the next-generation medium-voltage power conversion sys-tem”. In: IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 22.2 (2007), pp. 535–542. [Google Scholar]
  38. H. Meyvaert et al. “A light-load-efficient 11/1 switched-capacitor DC-DC converter with 94.7% efficiency while delivering 100 mW at 3.3 V”. In: IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 50.12 (2015), pp. 2849–2860. [Google Scholar]
  39. T. Taner. “The novel and innovative design with us-ing H2 fuel of PEM fuel cell: efficiency of thermo-dynamic analyze”. In: Fuel 302 (2021), p. 121109. [Google Scholar]
  40. F. Barbir and T. Gomez. “Efficiency and economics of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells”. In: international journal of hydrogen energy 22.10-11 (1997), pp. 1027–1037. [Google Scholar]
  41. Y. Hou, B. Wang, and Z. Yang. “A method for eval-uating the efficiency of PEM fuel cell engine”. In: Applied Energy 88.4 (2011), pp. 1181–1186. [Google Scholar]
  42. D. Guida and M. Minutillo. “Design methodol-ogy for a PEM fuel cell power system in a more electrical aircraft”. In: Applied energy 192 (2017), pp. 446–456. [Google Scholar]
  43. T. Godin, S. Harvey, and P. Stouffs. “Theoreti-cal analysis of environmental and energetic perfor-mance of very high temperature turbo-jet engines”. In: International journal of thermal sciences 38.5 (1999), pp. 442–451. [Google Scholar]
  44. P. Giannakakis, P. Laskaridis, and P. Pilidis. “Ef-fects of off-takes for aircraft secondary-power sys-tems on jet engine efficiency”. In: Journal of Propulsion and Power 27.5 (2011), pp. 1024–1031. [Google Scholar]
  45. U. Schumann. On the effect of emissions from air-craft engines on the state of the atmosphere. Inst. für Physik der Atmosphäre, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  46. S. Zhu et al. “A review of water injection applied on the internal combustion engine”. In: Energy conver-sion and management 184 (2019), pp. 139–158. [Google Scholar]
  47. J. Inman. Navigation and Nautical Astronomy for the Use of British Seamen. C. and J.Rivington, 1835. [Google Scholar]
  48. L. Piegl. “On NURBS: a Survey”. In: IEEE Com-puter Graphics and Applications 11.01 (1991), pp. 55–71. [Google Scholar]
  49. J. C. Lagarias et al. “Convergence properties of the Nelder–Mead simplex method in low dimensions”. In: SIAM Journal on optimization 9.1 (1998), pp. 112–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.