Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 358, 2026
EFM25 – Energy & Fluid Mechanics 2025
Article Number 01024
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635801024
Published online 12 March 2026
  1. R. Mösges, Computational fluid dynamics of the nasal cavity, in Nasal Physiology and Pathophysiology of Nasal Disorders, (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 247–255. 2013), DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-37250-6_19. [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Zhao, P. Malhotra, D. Rosen, P. Dalton, and E. A. Pribitkin, Computational Fluid Dynamics as Surgical Planning Tool: A Pilot Study on Middle Turbinate Resection. Anatomical Record, vol. 297, no. 11, pp. 2187–2195, (Nov. 2014), https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23033 [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Salati, J. Bartley, and D. E. White, Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Wall Shear Stress and Pressure Distribution from a Neti Pot During Nasal Saline Irrigation. J Med Biol Eng, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 175–184, (Apr. 2021), DOI:10.1007/s40846-020-00589-6. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Toğaçar, Z. Cömert, and B. Ergen, Classification of brain MRI using hyper column technique with convolutional neural network and feature selection method. Expert Syst Appl, vol. 149, p. 113274, Jul. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113274 [Google Scholar]
  5. G. G. Handsfield, C. H. Meyer, J. M. Hart, M. F. Abel, and S. S. Blemker, Relationships of 35 lower limb muscles to height and body mass quantified using MRI. J Biomech, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 631–638, (Feb. 2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.002. [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Liu, M. R. Johnson, E. A. Matida, S. Kherani, and J. Marsan, Creation of a standardized geometry of the human nasal cavity. J Appl Physiol, vol. 106, p. 59, (2009), https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.90376.2008 [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Zwicker, K. Yang, S. Melchionna, M. P. Brenner, B. Liu, and R. W. Lindsay, Validated reconstructions of geometries of nasal cavities from CT scans. Biomed Phys Eng Express, vol. 4, no. 4, (Jun. 2018), DOI:10.1088/2057-1976/aac6af. [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Trnka, H. Schmirlerová, M. Májovský, D. Netuka, and M. Schmirler, Preparation of a Real Model of Nasal Cavities from Computed Tomography for Numerical Simulation. MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 369, p. 01005, (2022), https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202236901005 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Trnka, H. Schmirlerová, M. Májovský, D. Netuka, and M. Schmirler, Examining the Impact of Inlet Shape on Nasal Cavity Flow Field: A Computational Investigation. MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 383, p. 00021, (Oct. 2023), DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/202338300021. [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Seeram, Computed Tomography: Physical Principles and Recent Technical Advances. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 87–109, (Jun. 2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2010.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. A. E. M. Eltorai, C. H. Hyman, and T. T. Healey, How Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Work? In: Essential Radiology Review. (Springer, Cham. 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26044-6_163 [Google Scholar]
  12. Berger A. Magnetic resonance imaging. BMJ. 324(7328):35 (Jan 2002). DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7328.35 [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Raušová, The Effect of Neglecting Transient Flow in Nasal Cavity CFD Simulations, Master Thesis. CTU in Prague, Prague 2025 [Google Scholar]
  14. Trnka F, Schmirlerova H, Schmirler M, et al. Changes in Nasal Anatomy and Airflow After Endoscopic Resection of Pituitary Adenomas Using Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Pilot Study. Cureus (6): e85568, (June 08, 2025). DOI:10.7759/cureus.85568 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.