Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 360, 2026
1st International Conference on “Quantum Innovations for Computing and Knowledge Systems” (QUICK’26)
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636001013
Published online 23 March 2026
  1. P.W. Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory, Physical Review A 52(4), pp. R2493-R2496, (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.R2493 [Google Scholar]
  2. A.M. Steane, Error correcting codes in quantum theory, Physical Review Letters 77(5) pp. 793-797, (1996), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.793 [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction, Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology (1997), https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9705052 [Google Scholar]
  4. A.Y. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of Physics 303(1), pp.2-30, (1997), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0 [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, J. Preskill, Topological quantum memory, Journal of Mathematical Physics 43(9), 4452-4505, (2002), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1499754 [Google Scholar]
  6. A.G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J.M. Martinis, A.N. Cleland, Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Physical Review A 86(3), 032324, (2012), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.032324 [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Chamberland, A.W. Cross, Fault-tolerant magic state preparation with flag qubits, Quantum 3, 143, (2019), https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-05-20-143 [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Chao, B.W. Reichardt, Quantum error correction with only two extra qubits, Physical Review Letters 121(5), 050502, (2018), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.050502 [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Aliferis, J. Preskill, Fault-tolerant quantum computation against biased noise, Physical Review A 78(5), 052331, (2008), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.052331 [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Kandala, K. Temme, A.D. Córcoles, A. Mezzacapo, J.M. Chow, J.M. Gambetta, Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor, Nature, 567(7749), 491-495, (2019), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1040-7 [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Temme, S. Bravyi, J.M. Gambetta, Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits, Physical Review Letters, 119(18),180509, (2017), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.180509 [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Li, S.C. Benjamin, Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization, Physical Review, X 7(2), (2017) 021050, (2017), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.021050 [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Torlai, R.G. Melko, Neural decoder for topological codes, Physical Review Letters, 119(3), 030501, (2017), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.030501 [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Baireuther, T.E. O'Brien, B. Tarasinski, C.W.J. Beenakker, Machine-learning-assisted correction of correlated qubit errors in a topological code, Quantum, 2, 48, (2018), https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-01-29-48 [Google Scholar]
  15. H.P. Nautrup, N. Delfosse, V. Dunjko, H.J. Briegel, N. Friis, Optimizing quantum error correction codes with reinforcement learning, Quantum, 3, 215, (2019), https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-12-16-215 [Google Scholar]
  16. M.H. Abobeih, Y. Wang, J. Randall, S.J.H. Loenen, C.E. Bradley, M. Markham, D.J. Twitchen, B.M. Terhal, T.H. Taminiau, Fault-tolerant operation of a logical qubit in a diamond quantum processor, Nature, 606(7916), 884-889, (2022), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04819-6 [Google Scholar]
  17. Z. Chen, K.J. Satzinger, J. Atalaya, A.N. Korotkov, et al., Exponential suppression of bit or phase errors with cyclic error correction, Nature, 595(7867), 383-387, (2021), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03588-y [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Egan, D.M. Debroy, C. Noel, A. Risinger, D. Zhu, D. Biswas, M. Newman, M. Li, K.R. Brown, M. Cetina, C. Monroe, Fault-tolerant control of an error-corrected qubit, Nature, 598(7880), 281-286, (2021), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03928-y [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.