Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 362, 2026
31st International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 31) Held Together with the 22nd Coherent Laser Radar Conference (CLRC 22)
Article Number 02022
Number of page(s) 4
Section Lidar Measurements of Clouds and Aerosol
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636202022
Published online 09 April 2026
  1. Yorks, J. E., et al. (2016), An Overview of the CATS Level 1 Data Products and Processing Algorithms, Geophys. Res. Let., 43, doi:10.1002/2016GL068006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Palm, S. P., et al. (2021). ICESat-2 atmospheric channel description, data processing and first results. Earth and Space Science, 8, e2020EA001470. [Google Scholar]
  3. McGill, M. J., et al. (2007), Airborne validation of spatial properties measured by the CALIPSO lidar, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D20201, doi:10.1029/2007JD008768. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hunt, W. H., et al. (2009), CALIPSO Lidar Description and Performance Assessment. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 1214–1228. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yorks, J.E., et al. (2021), Aerosol and Cloud Detection Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Space-Based Lidar Data. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12050606. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lolli, S. Machine Learning Techniques for Vertical Lidar-Based Detection, Characterization, and Classification of Aerosols and Clouds: A Comprehensive Survey. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 4318. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174318. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, K. et al. (2017), Beyond a Gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 26(7):3142–3155. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jia, F., et al. (2021), DDUNet: Dense Dense U-Net with Applications in Image Denoising. 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW), Montreal, BC, Canada, pp. 354–364, doi:10.1109/ICCVW54120.2021.00044. [Google Scholar]
  9. McGill, M.J., et al. (2002), Cloud Physics Lidar: instrument description and initial measurement results, Applied Optics, 41, 3725–3734. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nowottnick, E.P., et al. (2022), A Simulation Capability Developed for NASA GSFC’s Spaceborne Backscatter Lidars, Proceedings of the 30th International Laser Radar Conference, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37818-8. [Google Scholar]
  11. McGill, M.J., et al. (2015), The Cloud-Aerosol Transport System (CATS): a technology demonstration on the International Space Station, Proc. SPIE 9612, Lidar Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring XV, 96120A, doi:10.1117/12.2190841. [Google Scholar]
  12. Vaughan, M., et al. (2009), Fully automated detection of cloud and aerosol layers in the CALIPSO lidar measurements, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 2034–2050. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yorks, J. E., et al. (2011), Airborne validation of cirrus cloud properties derived from CALIPSO lidar measurements: Spatial properties, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D19207, doi:10.1029/2011JD015942. [Google Scholar]
  14. Thorsen, T. J., et al. (2011), Comparison of the CALIPSO satellite and ground-based observations of cirrus clouds at the ARM TWP sites, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D21203, doi:10.1029/2011JD015970. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.