Open Access
| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 362, 2026
31st International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 31) Held Together with the 22nd Coherent Laser Radar Conference (CLRC 22)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04016 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Lidar Measurements in the Stratosphere, Mesosphere, and Thermosphere | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636204016 | |
| Published online | 09 April 2026 | |
- I.S. McDermid, “Ground-based lidar and atmo-spheric studies,” Surv. Geophys., 9(2), 107–122 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01904118 [Google Scholar]
- M. De Maziere, et al., “The Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC): History, status and perspectives,” Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18(7), 4935–4964 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4935-2018 [Google Scholar]
- WMO-UNEP, “Scientific Assessments of Ozone Depletion”, (WMO, Geneva, 1985 – 2022), https://csl.noaa.gov/assessments/ozone/ [Google Scholar]
- T. Leblanc, et al., “Proposed standardized definitions for vertical resolution and uncertainty in the NDACC lidar ozone and temperature algorithms – Part 2: Ozone DIAL uncertainty budget,” Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9(8), 4051–4078 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4051-2016 [Google Scholar]
- R. Wing, et al. “Intercomparison and evaluation of ground- and satellite-based stratospheric ozone and temperature profiles above Observatoire de Haute-Provence during the Lidar Validation NDACC Experiment (LAVANDE),” Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5621–5642 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5621-2020 [Google Scholar]
- R. Wing., et al., “Evaluation of the new DWD ozone and temperature lidar during the Hohenpeiflenberg Ozone Profiling Study (HOPS) and comparison of results with previous NDACC campaigns, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3773–3794 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3773-2021 [Google Scholar]
- World Meteorological Organization (WMO), “Ozonesonde Measurement Principles and Best Operational Practices,” GAW Report No. 268, 173pp.(2021). https://library.wmo.int/idurl/4/57720 [Google Scholar]
- S. Fernandez, A. Murk, and N. Kämpfer, “GROMOS-C, a novel ground-based microwave radiometer for ozone measurement campaigns,” Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2649–2662 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2649-2015 [Google Scholar]
- C. Vigouroux, et al., “Trends of ozone total columns and vertical distribution from FTIR observations at eight NDACC stations around the globe,” Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2915–2933 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2915-2015 [Google Scholar]
- C.D. Rodgers, “Inverse methods for atmospheric sounding: theory and practice,” 240 pp. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2008). [Google Scholar]
- J.W. Waters, et al., “The Earth observing system microwave limb sounder (EOS MLS) on the AURA Satellite,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 44(5), 1075–1092 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.873771 [Google Scholar]
- G. Jaross, et al., “OMPS Limb Profiler instru-ment performance assessment,” J. Geophys. Res., 119, 4399–4412 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020482 [Google Scholar]
- S. Godin-Beekmann, et al., “Updated trends of the stratospheric ozone vertical distribution in the 60° S-60° N latitude range based on the LOTUS regression model”, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11657–11673 (2022). https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22- 11657-2022 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.