Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 362, 2026
31st International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 31) Held Together with the 22nd Coherent Laser Radar Conference (CLRC 22)
Article Number 06013
Number of page(s) 4
Section Joint CLRC/ILRC Session: Flux Measurements and Boundary Layer Dynamics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636206013
Published online 09 April 2026
  1. C. Flamant, P. Chazette, O. Caumont, “A network of water vapor Raman lidars for improving heavy precipitation forecasting in southern France: introducing the WaLiNeAs initiative”. Bull. of Atmos. Sci.& Technol. 2, 10 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  2. W. Kiemle, A. Brewer, G. Ehret, R. M. Hardesty, A. Fix, C. Senff, M. Wirtg, G. Poberaj and M. A. Lemone. “Latent Heat Flux Profiles from Collocated Airborne Water Vapor and Wind Lidars during IHOP_2002”. American Meteorological Society pp:627–639 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Behrendt, V. Wulfmeyer, C. Senff, S. K. Muppa, F. Späth, D. Lange, N. Kalthoff, and A. Wieser. Observation of sensible and latent heat flux profiles with lidar Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3221–3233 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Di Girolamo, D.Summa, R. Bhawar, T. Di Iorio, M.Cacciani, I.Veselovskii, A.Kolgotin. “Raman lidar observations of a Saharan dust outbreak event: Characterization of the dust optical properties and determination of particle size and microphysical Parameters”. Atmos. Environ. 50, 66–78 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Di Girolamo, D. Summa, M. Cacciani, E.G. Norton, G. Peters, Y. Dufournet, “Lidar and radar measurements of the melting layer: Observations of dark and bright band phenomena”. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 4143–4157 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Summa, D., F. Madonna, F, N. Franco, B. De Rosa, P. Di Girolamo. “Inter‐comparison of atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) height estimates from different profiling sensors and models in the framework of HyMeX‐SOP1”. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 15, 4153–4170 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  7. D.Summa, D, G.Vivone, N. Franco, G. D’Amico, B. De Rosa, P. Di Girolamo. “Atmospheric Boundary Layer Height: Inter‐ Comparison of Different Estimation Approaches Using the Raman Lidar as Benchmark”. Remote Sens. 15, 1381 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Bhawar, P. Di Girolamo, D. Summa, C. Flamant, D. Althausen, A. Behrendt, C. Kiemle, P. Bosser, M. Cacciani, C. Champollion, T. Di Iorio, R. Engelmann, C. Herold, D. Müller, S. Pal, M. Wirth, and V. Wulfmeyer. “The Water Vapour Intercomparison Effort in the Framework of the Convective and Orographically-Induced Precipitation Study: Airborne-to-Ground-based and airborne-to-airborne Lidar Systems”. Q. J.Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 325–348 (2011). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.