EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 362 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 362 (2026) 07003 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 362, 2026
31st International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 31) Held Together with the 22nd Coherent Laser Radar Conference (CLRC 22)
Article Number 07003
Number of page(s) 4
Section Joint CLRC/ILRC Session: Airborne and Spaceborne Wind Lidar Missions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636207003
Published online 09 April 2026
  1. EASA, “Annual Safety Review 2013,” 2013. Accessed: Mar. 20, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. FAA, Advisory Circular 120-88A - Preventing Injuries Caused by Turbulence. 2006. Accessed: Mar. 13, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Vrancken and J. Herbst, “Aeronautics Application of Direct-Detection Doppler Wind Lidar: An Adapted Design Based on a Fringe-Imaging Michelson Interferometer as Spectral Analyzer,” Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 14, p. 3356, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/rs14143356. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. C. Prosser, P. D. Williams, G. J. Marlton, and R. G. Harrison, “Evidence for Large Increases in Clear-Air Turbulence Over the Past Four Decades,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 50, no. 11, p. e2023GL103814, 2023, doi: 10.1029/2023GL103814. [Google Scholar]
  5. I. H. Smith, P. D. Williams, and R. Schiemann, “Clear-air turbulence trends over the North Atlantic in high-resolution climate models,” Clim. Dyn., Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00382-023-06694-x. [Google Scholar]
  6. L. N. Storer, P. D. Williams, and M. M. Joshi, “Global Response of Clear-Air Turbulence to Climate Change,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 44, no. 19, pp. 9976–9984, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1002/2017GL074618. [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Fezans, J. Schwithal, and D. Fischenberg, “In-flight remote sensing and identification of gusts, turbulence, and wake vortices using a Doppler LIDAR,” CEAS Aeronaut. J., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 313–333, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s13272-017-0240-9. [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Fezans, H.-D. Joos, and C. Deiler, “Gust load alleviation for a long-range aircraft with and without anticipation,” CEAS Aeronaut. J., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1033–1057, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s13272-019-00362-9. [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Vrancken, “Airborne remote detection of turbulence with forward-pointing LIDAR,” in Aviation Turbulence, R. Sharman and T. Lane, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23630-8. [Google Scholar]
  10. N. P. Schmitt, W. Rehm, T. Pistner, P. Zeller, H. Diehl, and P. Navé, “The AWIATOR airborne LIDAR turbulence sensor,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 11, no. 7–8, pp. 546–552, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2007.03.006. [Google Scholar]
  11. G. J. Rabadan, N. P. Schmitt, T. Pistner, and W. Rehm, “Airborne Lidar for Automatic Feedforward Control of Turbulent In-Flight Phenomena,” J. Aircr., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 392–403, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.2514/1.44950. [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Vrancken, M. Wirth, G. Ehret, H. Barny, P. Rondeau, and H. Veerman, “Airborne forward-pointing UV Rayleigh lidar for remote clear air turbulence detection: system design and performance,” Appl. Opt., vol. 55, no. 32, p. 9314, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1364/AO.55.009314. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Lugan and B. Michel, “The Green-Wake Project Targets both Air Traffic Security and Airport Throughput,” ERCIM NEWS, p. 55, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Vrancken, N. Fezans, D. Kiehn, O. Kliebisch, P. Linsmayer, and J. Thurn, “Aeronautics Application of Direct-Detection Doppler Wind Lidar: Alleviation of Airframe Structural Loads Caused by Turbulence and Gusts,” in 3rd European Lidar Conference, Granada, Spain (hybrid), Nov. 2021. Accessed: Sep. 30, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Vrancken et al., “How Future Aircraft Shall Lose Weight Thanks to Doppler Wind Lidar Technology-the UP Wing Project of the EC Clean Aviation Joint Undertaking,” presented at the 4th European Lidar Conference (ELC), Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Sep. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Cavaliere, N. Fezans, D. Kiehn, D. Quero, David, and P. Vrancken, Patrick, “Gust Load Control Design Challenge Including Lidar Wind Measurements and Based on the Common Research Model,” in Proceedings of the 2022 AIAA Scitech Forum, submitted, San Diego, California, USA, Jan. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Linsmayer and P. Vrancken, “Wind speed retrieval for high-altitude operation demonstration of a UV direct detection Doppler Wind Lidar based on Michelson Interferometer Fringe Imaging,” Atmospheric Meas. Tech. Discuss., vol. planned to be submitted by Jun. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Linsmayer and P. Vrancken, “High-altitude demonstration of a UV direct detection Doppler Wind Lidar based on Michelson Interferometer Fringe Imaging,” in 31st ILRC / this conference, Landshut, Jun. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Herbst and P. Vrancken, “Design of a monolithic Michelson interferometer for fringe imaging in a near-field, UV, direct-detection Doppler wind lidar,” Appl. Opt., vol. 55, no. 25, p. 6910, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1364/AO.55.006910. [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Herbst, “Development and test of a UV lidar receiver for the measurement of wind velocities aiming at the near-range characterization of wake vortices and gusts in clear air,” Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Boulant, M. Valla, J.-F. Mariscal, N. Rouanet, and D. T. Michel, “Robust molecular wind lidar with Quadri Mach-Zehnder interferometer and UV fiber laser for calibration/validation and future generation of Aeolus,” in Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XXVIII, SPIE, Oct. 2023, pp. 183–190. doi: 10.1117/12.2680187. [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Boulant, T. Michel, and M. Valla, “Optimization of a direct detection UV wind lidar architecture for 3D wind reconstruction at high altitude,” Atmospheric Meas. Tech. Discuss., pp. 1–19, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.5194/amt-2024-41. [Google Scholar]
  23. L. Bizet et al., “Direct-detection molecular UV lidar architecture for high altitude 3D wind reconstruction,” in 22th CLRC / this conference, Landshut, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Linsmayer and P. Vrancken, “Analyzing raw data measured by a UV direct detection Doppler Wind Lidar comprising a Fringe Imaging Michelson Interferometer: challenges and limitations,” presented at the 4th European Lidar Conference (ELC), Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Sep. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  25. H. P. J. Veerman, P. Vrancken, and L. Lombard, “Flight testing DELICAT–A promise for medium-range clear air turbulence protection,” in European 46th SETP and 25th SFTE Symposium, Lulea, Sweden, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Vrancken et al., “Flight Tests of the DELICAT Airborne LIDAR System for Remote Clear Air Turbulence Detection,” presented at the 27th International Laser Radar Conference, New York, Jul. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Khalil and N. Fezans, “A multi-channel H∞ preview control approach to load alleviation design for flexible aircraft,” CEAS Aeronaut. J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 401–412, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13272-021-00503-z. [Google Scholar]
  28. European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), Certification Specification for Large Aeroplanes (CS-25), Amendment 3. 2007. Accessed: Sep. 28, 2021. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.