Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 362, 2026
31st International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 31) Held Together with the 22nd Coherent Laser Radar Conference (CLRC 22)
Article Number 10001
Number of page(s) 4
Section Airborne Lidar Investigations, Large Scale Field Experiments, and Synergistic Use of Lidar and Other Instruments
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636210001
Published online 09 April 2026
  1. J. Hansen, R. Ruedy, M. Sato, and K. Lo, “Global Surface Temperature Change,” Reviews of Geophysics, vol. 48, no. 4, 2010, doi: 10.1029/2010RG000345. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. C. Serreze and J. A. Francis, “The Arctic Amplification Debate,” Climatic Change, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 241–264, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10584-005-9017-y. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Wendisch et al., “The Arctic Cloud Puzzle: Using ACLOUD/PASCAL Multiplatform Observations to Unravel the Role of Clouds and Aerosol Particles in Arctic Amplification,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 841–871, May 2019, doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0072.1. [Google Scholar]
  4. K.-N. Liou, “Influence of Cirrus Clouds on Weather and Climate Processes: A Global Perspective,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 1167–1199, Jun. 1986, doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<1167:IOCCOW>2.0.CO;2. [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Gasparini and U. Lohmann, “Why cirrus cloud seeding cannot substantially cool the planet,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 121, no. 9, pp. 4877–4893, 2016, doi: 10.1002/2015JD024666. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. M. Comstock, R.-F. Lin, D. O. Starr, and P. Yang, “Understanding ice supersaturation, particle growth, and number concentration in cirrus clouds,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 113, no. D23, 2008, doi: 10.1029/2008JD010332. [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Dekoutsidis, S. Grofl, M. Wirth, M. Krämer, and C. Rolf, “Characteristics of supersaturation in midlatitude cirrus clouds and their adjacent cloud-free air,” Atmos. Chem. Phys., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 3103–3117, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.5194/acp-23-3103-2023. [Google Scholar]
  8. E. De La Torre Castro et al., “Differences in microphysical properties of cirrus at high and mid-latitudes,” EGUsphere, pp. 1–34, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.5194/egusphere-2023-374. [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Dekoutsidis, M. Wirth, and S. Groß, “The effects of warm air intrusions in the high arctic on cirrus clouds,” EGUsphere, pp. 1–25, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.5194/egusphere-2023-2708. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Dahlke and M. Maturilli, “Contribution of Atmospheric Advection to the Amplified Winter Warming in the Arctic North Atlantic Region,” Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2017, p. e4928620, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1155/2017/4928620. [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Woods and R. Caballero, “The Role of Moist Intrusions in Winter Arctic Warming and Sea Ice Decline,” Journal of Climate, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 4473–4485, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0773.1. [Google Scholar]
  12. R. M. Graham et al., “Increasing frequency and duration of Arctic winter warming events,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 6974–6983, 2017, doi: 10.1002/2017GL073395. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Ovarlez et al., “Water vapour measurements inside cirrus clouds in Northern and Southern hemispheres during INCA,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 29, no. 16, pp. 60–1-60– 4, 2002, doi: 10.1029/2001GL014440. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Krämer et al., “A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 3463–3483, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016. [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Gierens, L. Wilhelm, M. Sommer, and D. Weaver, “On ice supersaturation over the Arctic,” metz, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 165–176, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1127/metz/2020/1012. [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Kärcher and U. Lohmann, “A parameterization of cirrus cloud formation: Homogeneous freezing of supercooled aerosols,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 107, no. D2, p. AAC 4-1–AAC 4-10, 2002, doi: 10.1029/2001JD000470. [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Kärcher and U. Lohmann, “A parameterization of cirrus cloud formation: Heterogeneous freezing,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 108, no. D14, 2003, doi: 10.1029/2002JD003220. [Google Scholar]
  18. W. Haag et al., “Freezing thresholds and cirrus cloud formation mechanisms inferred from in situ measurements of relative humidity,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1791–1806, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.5194/acp-3-1791-2003. [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Wendisch et al., “Overview: Quasi-Lagrangian observations of Arctic air mass transformations – Introduction and initial results of the HALO–(AC) 3 aircraft campaign.” Mar. 26, 2024. doi: 10.5194/egusphere-2024-783. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Krautstrunk and A. Giez, “The Transition From FALCON to HALO Era Airborne Atmospheric Research,” in Atmospheric Physics, U. Schumann, Ed., in Research Topics in Aerospace., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 609–624. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30183-4_37. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Wirth, A. Fix, P. Mahnke, H. Schwarzer, F. Schrandt, and G. Ehret, “The airborne multi-wavelength water vapor differential absorption lidar WALES: system design and performance,” Appl. Phys. B, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 201–213, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s00340-009-3365-7. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Mech et al., “HAMP – the microwave package on the High Altitude and LOng range research aircraft (HALO),” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 4539–4553, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.5194/amt-7-4539-2014. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.