Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 362, 2026
31st International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 31) Held Together with the 22nd Coherent Laser Radar Conference (CLRC 22)
Article Number 12003
Number of page(s) 5
Section CLRC Ground, Airborne, and Naval Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636212003
Published online 09 April 2026
  1. M. Barth et al., “Requirements for In Situ and Remote Sensing Capabilities in Convective and Turbulent Environments (C-RITE) Community Workshop - Final Report,” 2017, doi: 10.5065/D6DB80KR. [Google Scholar]
  2. W. Dahm and P. Hamlington, Introduction To Turbulence and Turbulent Flows. [Google Scholar]
  3. N. Bodini, J. K. Lundquist, R. Krishnamurthy, M. Pekour, L. K. Berg, and A. Choukulkar, “Spatial and temporal variability of turbulence dissipation rate in complex terrain,” Atmospheric Chem. Phys., vol. 19, pp. 4367–4382, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.5194/acp-19-4367-2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. P. M. Markowski, N. T. Lis, D. D. Turner, T. R. Lee, and M. S. Buban, “Observations of Near-Surface Vertical Wind Profiles and Vertical Momentum Fluxes from VORTEX-SE 2017: Comparisons to Monin– Obukhov Similarity Theory,” Mon. Weather Rev., vol. 147, no. 10, pp. 3811–3824, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-19-0091.1. [Google Scholar]
  5. V. Maurer, N. Kalthoff, A. Wieser, M. Kohler, M. Mauder, and L. Gantner, “Observed spatiotemporal variability of boundary-layer turbulence over flat, heterogeneous terrain,” Atmospheric Chem. Phys., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1377–1400, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.5194/acp-16-1377-2016. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Sathe, J. Mann, N. Vasiljevic, and G. Lea, “A six-beam method to measure turbulence statistics using ground-based wind lidars,” Atmospheric Meas. Tech., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 729–740, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.5194/amt-8-729-2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Gasch, J. Kasic, O. Maas, and Z. Wang, “Advancing airborne Doppler lidar wind profiling in turbulent boundary layer flow – an LES-based optimization of traditional scanning-beam versus novel fixed-beam measurement systems,” Atmospheric Meas. Tech., vol. 16, no. 22, pp. 5495–5523, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.5194/amt-16-5495-2023. [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Gasch, A. Wieser, J. K. Lundquist, and N. Kalthoff, “An LES-based airborne Doppler lidar simulator and its application to wind profiling in inhomogeneous flow conditions,” Atmospheric Meas. Tech., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1609–1631, Apr. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1609-2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Strauss, S. Serafin, S. Haimov, and V. Grubišić, “Turbulence in breaking mountain waves and atmospheric rotors estimated from airborne in situ and Doppler radar measurements,” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., vol. 141, no. 693, pp. 3207–3225, 2015, doi: 10.1002/qj.2604. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.