Open Access
| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 362, 2026
31st International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 31) Held Together with the 22nd Coherent Laser Radar Conference (CLRC 22)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 14005 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | CLRC Coherent DIAL, DISC and Aerosol Lidar | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636214005 | |
| Published online | 09 April 2026 | |
- W. Patiño Rosas and N. Cézard, “Greenhouse gas monitoring using an IPDA lidar based on a dual-comb spectrometer,” Opt. Express 32, 13614–13627 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- G. Wagner and D. Plusquellic, “Multi-frequency differential absorption LIDAR system for remote sensing of CO2 and H2O near 1.6 µm,” Opt. Express 26, 19420–19434 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- N. Cezard, S. Le Mehaute, J. Le Gouët, M. Valla, D. Goular, D. Fleury, C. Planchat, and A. Dolfi-Bouteyre, “Performance assessment of a coherent DIAL-Doppler fiber lidar at 1645 nm for remote sensing of methane and wind,” Opt. Express 28, 22345–22357 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- G. Rieker, F. Giorgetta, W. Swann, J. Kofler, A. Zolot, L. Sinclair, E. Baumann, C. Cromer, G. Petron, C. Sweeney, P. Tans, I. Coddington, and N. Newbury, “Frequency-comb-based remote sensing of greenhouse gases over kilometer air paths,” Optica 1, 290–298 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- X. Chen, C. Huang, J. Li, M. Lu, Y. Li, and H. Wei, “Phase-Sensitive Open-Path Dual-Comb Spectroscopy with Free-Running Combs,” Phys. Rev. Applied 19(4), (2023). [Google Scholar]
- J. R. Chen, K. Numata, and S. T. Wu, “Error reduction methods for integrated-path differential-absorption lidar measurements,” Opt. Express 20(14), 15589 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- A. Dolfi-Bouteyre, G. Canat, L. Lombard, M. Valla, A. Durécu, and C. Besson, “Long-range wind monitoring in real time with optimized coherent lidar,” Opt. Eng 56(3), 031217 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- H. Xu, D. Sun, Y. Wu, X. Wang, and J. Li, “A Time-Division Multifrequency Wind Lidar With High Spatial Resolution and Extended Detection Range,” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sensing Lett. 20, 1–5 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- T. Schreiber, D. Schimpf, D. Müller, F. Röser, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Influence of pulse shape in self-phase-modulation-limited chirped pulse fiber amplifier systems,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24(8), 1809 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- P. Pichon, J. Le Gouët, and L. Lombard, “SBS mitigation by sinusoidal phase modulation of a 1572 nm all-fiber amplifier for lidar CO2 sensing,” Appl. Opt. 63(7), 1753 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- L. Esberard, L. Lombard, and J.P. Ovarlez. “Increasing the stimulated brillouin threshold in single-mode passive fiber with a frequency comb”. In Laser Congress 2023 (ASSL, LAC). Optica Publishing Group (2023). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.