EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 365 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 365 (2026) 07002 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 365, 2026
BPU12 Congress – 12th General Conferences of the Balkan Physical Union
Article Number 07002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Physics Education, History and Philosophy of Physics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636507002
Published online 15 April 2026
  1. B. Guzzetti, Learning counter-intuitive science concepts: What have we learned from over a decade of research? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16, 89–98 (2000) DOI: 10.1080/105735600277971 [Google Scholar]
  2. Use discrepant teaching events to address students' misconceptions. Oakland University Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. (n.d.) https://oakland.edu/Assets/Oakland/cetl/fil es-and-documents/TeachingTips/DiscrepantEvent s.pdf [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Goodnough, M. Cashion, Exploring problem-based learning in the context of high school science: Design and implementation issues. Sch. Sci. Math., 106(7) 280–295 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/1.1949-8594.2006.tb17919.x [Google Scholar]
  4. A. A. Ogegbo, U. Ramnarain, Teaching and learning Physics using interactive simulation: A guided inquiry practice. South African Journal of Education, 42(1) (2022). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42n1a1997 [Google Scholar]
  5. K. De Witte, N. Rogge, Problem-based learning in secondary education: evaluation by an experiment. Education Economics, 24(1), 58–82 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2014.966061 [Google Scholar]
  6. M. A. Pease, D. Kuhn, Experimental analysis of the effective components of problem-based learning. Sci. Educ. 95.1 57–86 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20412 [Google Scholar]
  7. W. J. González-Espada, J. J. Birriel, I. Birriel, Discrepant events: A challenge to students' intuition. The Physics Teacher, 48(8), 508–511 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3502499 [Google Scholar]
  8. L. B. Duran, E. Duran, The 5E instructional model: A learning cycle approach for inquiry-based science teaching. Sci. Educ. Rev., 3(2), 49–58 (2004) https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1058007.pdf [Google Scholar]
  9. M. J. Prince, R. M. J. Felder, The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 36(5), 14–20 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Kapon, Doing research in school: Physics inquiry in the zone of proximal development. J Res Sci Teach, 53, 1172–1197 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21325 [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Af'idayani, I. Setiadi, F. Fahmi, The effect of inquiry model on science process skills and learning outcomes. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(12), 177–182 (2018) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1344846 [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Gunawan, A. Harjono, M. Nisyah, M. Kusdiastuti, L. Herayanti, Improving students' problem-solving skills using inquiry learning model combined with advance organizer. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 427–442 (2020) https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13427a [Google Scholar]
  13. A. C. Cooper, K. M. Southard, J. B. Osness, M. S. Bolger, The instructor's role in a model-based inquiry laboratory: Characterizing instructor supports and intentions in 40 teaching authentic scientific practices. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(1), ar9. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-07-0177 [Google Scholar]
  14. K.D. Tanner, Order matters: Using the 5E model to align teaching with how people learn. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(3), 159–164 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-06-0082 [Google Scholar]
  15. W.R. Puspita, F. Fardillah, The effectiveness of the learning cycle model (5e and 7e) in learning to build flat side sides viewed from student self-efficacy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1764, No. 1, p. 012110) (2021), IOP Publishing DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012110 [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Bunterm, K. Lee, J.N.L. Kong, S. Srikoon, P. Vangpoomyai, J. Rattanavongsa, G. Rachahoon, Do Different Levels of Inquiry Lead to Different Learning Outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937–1959 (2014) DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2014.886347 [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Zion, R. Mendelovici, Moving from structured to open inquiry: challenges and limits. Science Education international, 23(4), 383–399 (2012) ISSN-2077-2327 [Google Scholar]
  18. R.O. Nelson-Gray, J.R. Haas, B. Romano, J.D. Herbert, D. L. Herbert, Effects of open-ended versus close-ended questions on interviewees' problem-related statements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69(3-1), 903–911 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125890693-136 [Google Scholar]
  19. R.B. Toma, Confirmation and structured inquiry teaching: Does it improve students' achievement motivations in school science? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(1), 28–41 (2022 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00197-3 [Google Scholar]
  20. Inquiry-Based Learning, Central Michigan University https://www.cmich.edu/offices-departments/curriculum-instructional-support/explore-instructional-methods/inquiry-based-learning#:~:text=Structured%20Inquiry%20%E2%80%93%20An%20instructor%20provides,results%20are%20not%20already%20known [Google Scholar]
  21. J.R. Polanin, M. Austin, J. A. Taylor, R. R. Steingut, M. A. Rodgers, R. Williams, Effects of the 5E instructional model: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AERA Open, 10, (2024) https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241269866 [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Ruiz-Martín, R. W. Bybee, The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E Model of Instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), Article 21 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00337-z [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Garcia-Grau, C. Valls, N. Piqué, H. Ruiz-Martin, The long-term effects of introducing the 5E model of instruction on students' conceptual learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1441–1458 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  24. S. L. Hokkanen, Improving student achievement, interest and confidence in science through the implementation of the 5E learning cycle in the middle grades of an urban school. (2011) https://scholarworks.montana.edu/items/7f 781d09-e1bc-470d-a732-155ab48ed72f [Google Scholar]
  25. Physics Grade 12 Schoolbook, Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs. (Section 4.2 AR Digital School), https://ebooks.edu.gr/ebooks/v/html/8547/2728/Fysiki-G-Lykeiou-ThSp html-apli/ [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.