Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 366, 2026
10th Complexity-Disorder Days 2025
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636601002
Published online 29 April 2026
  1. E.P. Wigner, Remarks on the mind-body question, in I.J. Good (ed.), The Scientist Speculates, Heinemann, London (1961). [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Zwirn, The Measurement Problem: Decoherence and Convivial Solipsism, Found. Phys. 46, 635 (2016). arXiv:1505.05029 [Google Scholar]
  3. J. von Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Springer, Berlin (1932). English translation: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press (1955). [Google Scholar]
  4. F. London, E. Bauer, La théorie de l’observation en mécanique quantique, Hermann (1939). [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Everett, On the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, Department of Physics (1957). [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Everett, Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454–462 (1957). [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Rovelli, Relational Quantum Mechanics, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35, 1637–1678 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  8. G.C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, T. Weber, Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  9. G.C. Ghirardi, Collapse Theories, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011). [Google Scholar]
  10. C.A. Fuchs, R. Schack, Quantum-Bayesian coherence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1693 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Zwirn, Non Locality versus Modified Realism, Found. Phys. 50, 1–26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-019-00314-7. arXiv:1812.06451 [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Zwirn, Everett’s Interpretation and Convivial Solipsism, Quantum Rep. 5, 267–281 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum5010018 [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Zwirn, Convivial Solipsism as a maximally perspectival interpretation, Found. Phys. 54, 39 (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06815 [Google Scholar]
  14. Č. Brukner, On the quantum measurement problem, in “Quantum [Un]speakables II”, Eds. R. Bertlmann and A. Zeilinger (The Frontiers Collection, Springer, 2017). Preprint at arXiv:1507.05255 [Google Scholar]
  15. Č. Brukner, A no-go theorem for observer-independent facts, Entropy 20(5) (2018). [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Frauchiger, R. Renner, Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself, Nat. Commun. 9, 3711 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Pusey, Is QBism 80% complete, or 20%?, YouTube video (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Ormrod, J. Barrett, A no-go theorem for absolute observed events without inequalities or modal logic (2022). [Google Scholar]
  19. K.-W. Bong, A. Utreras-Alarcón, F. Ghafari, N. Liang, Y.-C. Tischler, E.G. Cavalcanti, G.J. Pryde, H.M. Wiseman, A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox, Nat. Phys. 16(12) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Gao, Quantum theory is incompatible with relativity: A new proof beyond Bell’s theorem and a test of unitary quantum theories (2019). [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Schmid, Y. Ying, M. Leifer, A review and analysis of six extended Wigner’s friend arguments, arXiv:2308.16220v3 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Proietti, A. Pickston, F. Graffitti, P. Barrow, D. Kundys, C. Branciard, M. Ringbauer, A. Fedrizzi, Experimental test of local observer independence, Sci. Adv. 5(9) (2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.