EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 366 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 366 (2026) 01007 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 366, 2026
10th Complexity-Disorder Days 2025
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636601007
Published online 29 April 2026
  1. H.M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T.N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I.N. Shindyalov, P.E. Bourne. The protein data bank. Nucleic acids research 28, 235–242 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Nallapareddy, N. Bordin, I. Sillitoe, M. Heinzinger, M. Littmann, V.P. Waman, N. Sen, B. Rost, C. Orengo. Cathe: Detection of remote homologues for cath superfamilies using embeddings from protein language models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 39, (2023) [Google Scholar]
  3. R.L.M. van Montfort, P. Workman. Structure-based drug design: Aiming for a perfect fit. Essays in biochemistry 61, 431–437 (2017) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. O. Carugo. B-factor accuracy in protein crystal structures. Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology 78, 69–74 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  5. O. Carugo. How large b-factors can be in protein crystal structures. BMC bioinformatics 19, 61 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Ringe, G.A. Petsko. Mapping protein dynamics by x-ray diffraction. Progress in biophysics and molecular biology 45, 197–235 (1985) [Google Scholar]
  7. O. Carugo, P. Argos. Reliability of atomic displacement parameters in protein crystal structures. Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography 55, 473–478 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  8. O. Carugo. How anisotropic and isotropic atomic displacement parameters monitor protein covalent bonds rigidity: Isotropic b-factors underestimate bond rigidity. Amino acids 53, 779–782 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Carugo. Uses and abuses of the atomic displacement parameters in structural biology. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 2449, 281–298 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Kuzmanic, B. Zagrovic. Determination of ensemble-average pairwise root mean-square deviation from experimental b-factors. Biophysical journal 98, 861–871 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Bornot, C. Etchebest, A.G. de Brevern. Predicting protein flexibility through the prediction of local structures. Proteins 79, 839–852 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  12. W.J. Cook, L.C. Jeffrey, M.L. Sullivan, R.D. Vierstra. Three-dimensional structure of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (e2). The Journal of biological chemistry 267, 15116–15121 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  13. W.L. Delano. The pymol molecular graphics system on world wide web. Http://www.Pymol.Org. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Berjanskii, D.S. Wishart. Nmr: Prediction of protein flexibility. Nature protocols 1, 683–688 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Ishima, D.A. Torchia. Protein dynamics from nmr. Nature structural biology 7, 740–743 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Teilum, J.G. Olsen, B.B. Kragelund. Protein stability, flexibility and function. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1814, 969–976 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  17. C.C. Cornilescu, F. Bouamr, X. Yao, C. Carter, N. Tjandra. Structural analysis of the n-terminal domain of the human t-cell leukemia virus capsid protein. Journal of molecular biology 306, 783–797 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  18. V.N. Uversky, J.R. Gillespie, A.L. Fink. Why are “natively unfolded” proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins 41, 415–427 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  19. V.N. Uversky. Natively unfolded proteins: A point where biology waits for physics. Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society 11, 739–756 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  20. V.N. Uversky. Protein intrinsic disorder and structure-function continuum. Progress in molecular biology and translational science 166, 1–17 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  21. J.C. Hansen, X. Lu, E.D. Ross, R.W. Woody. Intrinsic protein disorder, amino acid composition, and histone terminal domains. The Journal of biological chemistry 281, 1853–1856 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  22. V.N. Uversky. A decade and a half of protein intrinsic disorder: Biology still waits for physics. Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society 22, 693–724 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  23. A.H. Phillips, R.W. Kriwacki. Intrinsic protein disorder and protein modifications in the processing of biological signals. Current opinion in structural biology 60, 1–6 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Trivedi, H.A. Nagarajaram. Intrinsically disordered proteins: An overview. International journal of molecular sciences 23, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Katuwawala, Z. Peng, J. Yang, L. Kurgan. Computational prediction of morfs, short disorder-to-order transitioning protein binding regions. Computational and structural biotechnology journal 17, 454–462 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Mendoza-Espinosa, V. García-González, A. Moreno, R. Castillo, J. Mas-Oliva. Disorder-to-order conformational transitions in protein structure and its relationship to disease. Molecular and cellular biochemistry 330, 105–120 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Song, L. Kurgan. Two decades of advances in sequence-based prediction of morfs, disorder-to-order transitioning binding regions. Expert review of proteomics 22, 1–9 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Zhu, B.H. Luo, T. Xiao, C. Zhang, N. Nishida, T.A. Springer. Structure of a complete integrin ectodomain in a physiologic resting state and activation and deactivation by applied forces. Molecular cell 32, 849–861 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Sali, T.L. Blundell. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. Journal of molecular biology 234, 779–815 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Varadi, S. Kosol, P. Lebrun, E. Valentini, M. Blackledge, A.K. Dunker, I.C. Felli, J.D. Forman-Kay, R.W. Kriwacki, R. Pierattelli, et al. Pe-db: A database of structural ensembles of intrinsically disordered and of unfolded proteins. Nucleic acids research 42, D326–335 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  31. Y.G. Sterckx, A.N. Volkov, W.F. Vranken, J. Kragelj, M.R. Jensen, L. Buts, A. Garcia-Pino, T. Jove, L. Van Melderen, M. Blackledge, et al. Small-angle x-ray scatteringand nuclear magnetic resonance-derived conformational ensemble of the highly flexible antitoxin paaa2. Structure 22, 854–865 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Eisenberg. The discovery of the alpha-helix and beta-sheet, the principal structural features of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 11207–11210 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  33. L. Pauling, R.B. Corey. The pleated sheet, a new layer configuration of polypeptide chains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 37, 251–256 (1951) [Google Scholar]
  34. L. Pauling, R.B. Corey, H.R. Branson. The structure of proteins; two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 37, 205–211 (1951) [Google Scholar]
  35. D.J. Barlow, J.M. Thornton. Helix geometry in proteins. Journal of molecular biology 201, 601–619 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  36. L. Regan. Protein structure. Born to be beta. Curr Biol 4, 656–658 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  37. W. Kabsch, C. Sander. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577–2637 (1983) [Google Scholar]
  38. M. Bansal, S. Kumar, R. Velavan. Helanal: A program to characterize helix geometry in proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn 17, 811–819 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  39. N. Fernandez-Fuentes, E. Querol, F.X. Aviles, M.J. Sternberg, B. Oliva. Prediction of the conformation and geometry of loops in globular proteins: Testing archdb, a structural classification of loops. Proteins 60, 746–757 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  40. Y. Mansiaux, A.P. Joseph, J.C. Gelly, A.G. de Brevern. Assignment of polyproline ii conformation and analysis of sequence--structure relationship. PloS one 6, e18401 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  41. P. Craveur, A.P. Joseph, J. Rebehmed, A.G. de Brevern. Β-bulges: Extensive structural analyses of β-sheets irregularities. Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society 22, 1366–1378 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  42. P. Craveur, T.J. Narwani, N. Srinivasan, J.C. Gelly, J. Rebehmed, A.G. de Brevern. Shaking the β-bulges. IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics 19, 14–18 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  43. A.G. de Brevern, C. Etchebest, S. Hazout. Bayesian probabilistic approach for predicting backbone structures in terms of protein blocks. Proteins 41, 271–287 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  44. A.G. de Brevern. New assessment of a structural alphabet. In silico biology 5, 283–289 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  45. M. Tyagi, C. Benros, J. Martin, A.G. de Brevern. Description of the local protein structure. Ii. Novel approaches. In Recent research developments in protein engineering, de Brevern, A.G., Ed. Research Signpost: Trivandrum 2007; pp 34–47. [Google Scholar]
  46. J. Barnoud, H. Santuz, P. Craveur, A.P. Joseph, V. Jallu, A.G. de Brevern, P. Poulain. Pbxplore: A tool to analyze local protein structure and deformability with protein blocks. PeerJ 5, e4013 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  47. G. Faure, A.P. Joseph, P. Craveur, T.J. Narwani, N. Srinivasan, J.C. Gelly, J. Rebehmed, A.G. de Brevern. Ipbavizu: A pymol plugin for an efficient 3d protein structure superimposition approach. Source Code Biol Med 14, 5 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  48. Y. Ghouzam, G. Postic, P.E. Guerin, A.G. de Brevern, J.C. Gelly. Orion: A web server for protein fold recognition and structure prediction using evolutionary hybrid profiles. Sci Rep 6, 28268 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  49. B. Schneider, J. Cerny, D. Svozil, P. Cech, J.C. Gelly, A.G. de Brevern. Bioinformatic analysis of the protein/DNA interface. Nucleic acids research 42, 3381–3394 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  50. S. Leonard, A.P. Joseph, N. Srinivasan, J.C. Gelly, A.G. de Brevern. Mulpba: An efficient multiple protein structure alignment method based on a structural alphabet. J Biomol Struct Dyn 32, 661–668 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  51. L. Fourrier, C. Benros, A.G. de Brevern. Use of a structural alphabet for analysis of short loops connecting repetitive structures. BMC bioinformatics 5, 58 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  52. P. Craveur, A.P. Joseph, J. Esque, T.J. Narwani, F. Noël, N. Shinada, M. Goguet, S. Leonard, P. Poulain, O. Bertrand, et al. Protein flexibility in the light of structural alphabets. Frontiers in molecular biosciences 2, 20 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  53. G.E. Crooks, G. Hon, J.M. Chandonia, S.E. Brenner. Weblogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14, 1188–1190 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  54. H.N. Vu, R. Radjasandirane, J. Diharce, A.G. de Brevern. Impact of ruxolitinib interactions on jak2 jh1 domain dynamics. International journal of molecular sciences 26, 3727 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  55. M. Goguet, T.J. Narwani, R. Petermann, V. Jallu, A.G. de Brevern. In silico analysis of glanzmann variants of calf-1 domain of α(iib)β(3) integrin revealed dynamic allosteric effect. Sci Rep 7, 8001 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  56. V. Jallu, P. Poulain, P.F. Fuchs, C. Kaplan, A.G. de Brevern. Modeling and molecular dynamics of hpa-1a and -1b polymorphisms: Effects on the structure of the β3 subunit of the αiibβ3 integrin. PloS one 7, e47304 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  57. M.Y. Koker, N. Sarper, C. Albayrak, B. Zulfikar, E. Zengin, B. Saraymen, D. Albayrak, B. Koc, H. Avcilar, M. Karakükcü, et al. New αiibβ3 variants in 28 turkish glanzmann patients; structural hypothesis for complex activation by residues variations in i-egf domains. Platelets 33, 551–561 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  58. E. Reboul, J. Marien, C. Prévost, A. Taly, S. Sacquin-Mora. Menger_curvature : A mdakit implementation to decipher the dynamics, curvatures and flexibilities of polymeric backbones at the residue level. bioRxiv, 2025.2004.2004.647214 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  59. V. Jallu, P. Poulain, P.F. Fuchs, C. Kaplan, A.G. de Brevern. Modeling and molecular dynamics simulations of the v33 variant of the integrin subunit β3: Structural comparison with the l33 (hpa-1a) and p33 (hpa-1b) variants. Biochimie 105, 84–90 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  60. C. Martins, J. Diharce, A.A. Nadaradjane, A.G. de Brevern. Evaluation of the potential impact of in silico humanization on v(h)h dynamics. International journal of molecular sciences 24, (2023) [Google Scholar]
  61. C. Martins, F. Gardebien, A.A. Nadaradjane, J. Diharce, A.G. de Brevern. A simple analysis of the second (extra) disulfide bridge of v(h)hs. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 29, (2024) [Google Scholar]
  62. A. Melarkode Vattekatte, N.K. Shinada, T.J. Narwani, F. Noël, O. Bertrand, J.P. Meyniel, A. Malpertuy, J.C. Gelly, F. Cadet, A.G. de Brevern. Discrete analysis of camelid variable domains: Sequences, structures, and in-silico structure prediction. PeerJ 8, e8408 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  63. A.A. Nadaradjane, J. Diharce, J. Rebehmed, F. Cadet, F. Gardebien, J.C. Gelly, C. Etchebest, A.G. de Brevern. Quality assessment of v(h)h models. J Biomol Struct Dyn 41, 13287–13301 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  64. F. Noël, A. Malpertuy, A.G. de Brevern. Global analysis of vhhs framework regions with a structural alphabet. Biochimie 131, 11–19 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  65. A.M. Vattekatte, F. Cadet, J.C. Gelly, A.G. de Brevern. Insights into comparative modeling of v(h)h domains. International journal of molecular sciences 22, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  66. A.M. Vattekatte, J. Diharce, J. Rebehmed, F. Cadet, F. Gardebien, C. Etchebest, A.G. de Brevern. General trends of the camelidae antibody v(h)hs domain dynamics. International journal of molecular sciences 24, (2023) [Google Scholar]
  67. P. Vishwakarma, A.M. Vattekatte, N. Shinada, J. Diharce, C. Martins, F. Cadet, F. Gardebien, C. Etchebest, A.A. Nadaradjane, A.G. de Brevern. V(h)h structural modelling approaches: A critical review. International journal of molecular sciences 23, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  68. L. Chevrier, A. de Brevern, E. Hernandez, J. Leprince, H. Vaudry, A.M. Guedj, N. de Roux. Prr repeats in the intracellular domain of kiss1r are important for its export to cellmembrane. Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.) 27, 1004–1014 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  69. M. Ladislav, J. Cerny, J. Krusek, M. Horak, A. Balik, L. Vyklicky. The lili motif of m3-s2 linkers is a component of the nmda receptor channel gate. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience 11, 113 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  70. A.G. de Brevern, H. Wong, C. Tournamille, Y. Colin, C. Le Van Kim, C. Etchebest. A structural model of a seven-transmembrane helix receptor: The duffy antigen/receptor for chemokine (darc). Biochimica et biophysica acta 1724, 288–306 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  71. A.G. de Brevern, A. Floch, A. Barrault, J. Martret, G. Bodivit, R. Djoudi, F. Pirenne, C. Tournamille. Alloimmunization risk associated with amino acid 223 substitution in the rhd protein: Analysis in the light of molecular modeling. Transfusion 58, 2683–2692 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  72. A. Floch, T. Galochkina, F. Pirenne, C. Tournamille, A.G. de Brevern. Molecular dynamics of the human rhd and rhag blood group proteins. Frontiers in chemistry 12, 1360392 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  73. A. Floch, F. Pirenne, A. Barrault, B. Chami, C. Toly-Ndour, C. Tournamille, A.G. de Brevern. Insights into anti-d formation in carriers of rhd variants through studies of 3d intraprotein interactions. Transfusion 61, 1286–1301 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  74. J.R. Allison, R.C. Rivers, J.C. Christodoulou, M. Vendruscolo, C.M. Dobson. A relationship between the transient structure in the monomeric state and the aggregation propensities of α-synuclein and β-synuclein. Biochemistry 53, 7170–7183 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  75. V.R. Bacot-Davis, J.J. Ciomperlik, H.A. Basta, C.C. Cornilescu, A.C. Palmenberg. Solution structures of mengovirus leader protein, its phosphorylated derivatives, and in complex with nuclear transport regulatory protein, rangtpase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 15792–15797 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  76. A. De Biasio, A. Ibanez de Opakua, T.N. Cordeiro, M. Villate, N. Merino, N. Sibille, M. Lelli, T. Diercks, P. Bernado, F.J. Blanco. P15paf is an intrinsically disordered protein with nonrandom structural preferences at sites of interaction with other proteins. Biophysical journal 106, 865–874 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  77. J.A. Marsh, J.D. Forman-Kay. Structure and disorder in an unfolded state under nondenaturing conditions from ensemble models consistent with a large number of experimental restraints. Journal of molecular biology 391, 359–374 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  78. H.D. Mertens, A. Piljic, C. Schultz, D.I. Svergun. Conformational analysis of a genetically encoded fret biosensor by saxs. Biophysical journal 102, 2866–2875 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  79. T. Mittag, J. Marsh, A. Grishaev, S. Orlicky, H. Lin, F. Sicheri, M. Tyers, J.D. Forman-Kay. Structure/function implications in a dynamic complex of the intrinsically disordered sic1 with the cdc4 subunit of an scf ubiquitin ligase. Structure 18, 494–506 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  80. V. Ozenne, R. Schneider, M. Yao, J.R. Huang, L. Salmon, M. Zweckstetter, M.R. Jensen, M. Blackledge. Mapping the potential energy landscape of intrinsically disordered proteins at amino acid resolution. J Am Chem Soc 134, 15138–15148 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  81. M. Sanchez-Martinez, R. Crehuet. Application of the maximum entropy principle to determine ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins from residual dipolar couplings. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16, 26030–26039 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  82. S.G. Sivakolundu, D. Bashford, R.W. Kriwacki. Disordered p27kip1 exhibits intrinsic structure resembling the cdk2/cyclin a-bound conformation. Journal of molecular biology 353, 1118–1128 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  83. S.D. Weeks, E.V. Baranova, M. Heirbaut, S. Beelen, A.V. Shkumatov, N.B. Gusev, S.V. Strelkov. Molecular structure and dynamics of the dimeric human small heat shock protein hspb6. J Struct Biol 185, 342–354 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  84. T.J. Narwani, P. Craveur, N.K. Shinada, A. Floch, H. Santuz, A.M. Vattekatte, N. Srinivasan, J. Rebehmed, J.C. Gelly, C. Etchebest, et al. Discrete analyses of protein dynamics. J Biomol Struct Dyn 38, 2988–3002 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  85. T.J. Narwani, P. Craveur, N.K. Shinada, H. Santuz, J. Rebehmed, C. Etchebest, A.G. de Brevern. Dynamics and deformability of α-, 310and π-helices. Archives of Biological Sciences 70, 21–31 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  86. A. Melarkode Vattekatte, T.J. Narwani, A. Floch, M. Maljković, S. Bisoo, N.K. Shinada, A. Kranjc, J.C. Gelly, N. Srinivasan, N. Mitić, et al. Data set of intrinsically disordered proteins analysed at a local protein conformation level. Data in brief 29, 105383 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  87. M.V. Akhila, T.J. Narwani, A. Floch, M. Maljković, S. Bisoo, N.K. Shinada, A. Kranjc, J.-C. Gelly, N. Srinivasan, N. Mitić, et al. A structural entropy index to analyse local conformations in intrinsically disordered proteins. Journal of Structural Biology 210, 107464 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  88. A.G. de Brevern. Analysis of protein disorder predictions in the light of a protein structural alphabet. Biomolecules 10, (2020) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.