EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 368 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 368 (2026) 00018 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 368, 2026
9th Heavy Ion Accelerator Symposium (HIAS 2025)
Article Number 00018
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636800018
Published online 13 May 2026
  1. D.J. Hinde et al., Experimental studies of the competition between fusion and quasifission in the formation of heavy and superheavy nuclei, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 118, 103856 (2021). 10.1016/j.ppnp.202L103856 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. C.E. Düllmann, How elements up to 118 were reached and how to go beyond, EPJ Web of Conferences 163, 00015 (2017). 10.1051/epj-conf/201716300015 [Google Scholar]
  3. R.G. Thomas et al., Entrance channel dependence of quasifission in reactions forming 220Th, Phys. Rev. C 77, 034610 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevC.77.034610 [Google Scholar]
  4. Y.T. Oganessian et al., Investigation of reactions with 50Ti and 54Cr for the synthesis of new elements, Phys. Rev. C 112, 014603 (2025). 10.1103/k2g4-5k7x [Google Scholar]
  5. J.B. Roberto et al., Actinide targets for the synthesis of super-heavy elements, Nuclear Physics A 944, 99 (2015).10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.06.009 [Google Scholar]
  6. J.M. Gates et al., Toward the discovery of new elements: Production of livermorium (z = 116) with 50Ti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 172502 (2024). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.172502 [Google Scholar]
  7. R. du Rietz et al., Mapping quasifission characteristics and timescales in heavy element formation reactions, Phys. Rev. C 88, 054618 (2013). 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.054618 [Google Scholar]
  8. D.Y. Jeung et al., Sequential fission and the influence of 208Pb closed shells on the dynamics ofsuper-heavy element synthesis reactions, Phys. Lett. B 837, 137641 (2023).10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137641 [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Guarino et al., Mass drift in reactions between a heavy and a light nucleus, Nuclear Physics A 424, 157 (1984). 10.1016/0375-9474(84)90133-7 [Google Scholar]
  10. J.V. Kratz et al., Mass-yield distributions in the reaction of 84Kr ions with 238U, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 502 (1974).10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.502 [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Möller et al., Fission barriers at the end of the chart of the nuclides, Phys. Rev. C 91, 024310 (2015). 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.024310 [Google Scholar]
  12. D.Y. Jeung et al., Energy dissipation and suppression of capture cross sections in heavy ion reactions, Phys. Rev. C 103, 034603 (2021). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.103.034603 [Google Scholar]
  13. J.F. Ziegler et al., SRIM - The stopping and range of ions in matter (2010), Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 268, 1818 (2010). 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091 [Google Scholar]
  14. D.J. Hinde et al., Conclusive evidence for the influence of nuclear orientation on quasifission, Phys. Rev.C 53, 1290 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevC.53.1290 [Google Scholar]
  15. H.M. Albers et al., Zeptosecond contact times for element Z=120 synthesis, Phys. Lett. B 808, 135626 (2020).10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135626 [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Banerjee et al., Systematic evidence for quasifission in 9Be-,12C- and 16O-induced reactions forming 258,260No, Phys. Rev. C 102, 024603 (2020). 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024603 [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Berriman et al., Energy dependence of p + 232Th fission mass distributions: Mass-asymmetric standard I and standard II modes, and multichance fission, Phys. Rev. C 105, 064614 (2022). 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.064614 [Google Scholar]
  18. K.H. Schmidt et al., General Description of Fission Observables: GEF Model Code, Nuclear Data Sheets 131, 107 (2016).10.1016/j.nds.2015.12.009 [Google Scholar]
  19. D.J. Hinde et al., Neutron emission as a probe of fusion-fission and quasifission dynamics, Phys. Rev. C 45, 1229 (1992).10.1103/PhysRevC.45.1229 [Google Scholar]
  20. T.R. England, B.F. Rider, Evaluation and compilation of fission product yields 1993 (1995). 10.2172/10103145 [Google Scholar]
  21. K.F. Flynn et al., Mass distributions for the spontaneous fission of 248Cm and 250Cf, Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry 39, 759 (1977). 10.1016/0022-1902(77)80149-8 [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Brandt et al., Mass and energy distributions in the spontaneous fission of some heavy isotopes, Phys. Rev. 131, 2617 (1963).10.1103/PhysRev.131.2617 [Google Scholar]
  23. K. Nishio et al., Evidence for quasifission in the sub-barrier reaction of 30Si + 238U, Phys. Rev. C 82, 044604 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevC.82.044604 [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Simenel et al., Comparison of fission and quasifission modes, Phys. Lett. B 822, 136648 (2021). 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136648 [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Banerjee et al., Mechanisms suppressing superheavy element yields in cold fusion reactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 232503 (2019). 10.1103/Phys-RevLett.122.232503 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.