EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 368 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 368 (2026) 00020 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 368, 2026
9th Heavy Ion Accelerator Symposium (HIAS 2025)
Article Number 00020
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636800020
Published online 13 May 2026
  1. D.J. Hinde, M. Dasgupta, and E.C. Simpson, Experimental studies of the competition between fusion and quasifission in the formation of heavy and superheavy nuclei. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 118, 103856 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103856. [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Vardaci, M.G. Itkis, I.M. Itkis, G. Knyazheva, and E.M. Kozulin, Fission and quasifission toward the superheavy mass region. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 46, 103002 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ab3118. [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Simenel, P. McGlynn, A.S. Umar, and K. Godbey, Comparison of fission and quasi-fission modes. Phys. Lett. B 822, 136648 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136648. [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Simenel, K. Godbey, and S. Umar, Timescales of Quantum Equilibration, Dissipation and Fluctuation in Nuclear Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 212504 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.212504. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Pullanhiotan, M. Rejmund, A. Navin, W. Mittig, and S. Bhattacharyya, Performance of VAMOS for reactions near the Coulomb barrier. Nucl. Instr. Methods A 593, 343 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.05.003. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Rejmund et al., Performance of the improved larger acceptance spectrometer: VAMOS++. Nucl. Instr. Methods A 646, 184 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2011.05.007. [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Toke et al., Compound Nucleus Fission and Quasi-Fission in Reactions of 238U with 16O and 27Al. Phys. Lett. B 142, 258 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(84)91194-8. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Toke et al., Quasi-fission - The Mass-Drift Mode in Heavy-Ion Reactions. Nucl. Phys. A 440, 327 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(85)90344-6. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Caamaño et al., Isotopic yield distributions of transfer- and fusion-induced fission from 238U + 12C reactions in inverse kinematics. Phys. Rev. C 88, 024605 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.024605. [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Ramos et al., Isotopic fission-fragment distributions of 238U, 239Np, 240Pu, 244Cm, and 250Cf produced through inelastic scattering, transfer, and fusion reactions in inverse kinematics. Phys. Rev. C 97, 054612 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.054612. [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Ramos et al., First Direct Measurement of Isotopic Fission-Fragment Yields of 239U. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 092503 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.092503. [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Schmitt et al., Experimental Evidence for Common Driving Effects in Low-Energy Fission from Sub-lead to Actinides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 132502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.132502. [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Rodríguez-Tajes et al., Transfer reactions in inverse kinematics: An experimental approach for fission investigations. Phys. Rev. C 89, 024614 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.024614. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Simpson et al., The EXOGAM array: A radioactive beam gamma-ray spectrometer. Acta Phys. Hung., New Ser. Heavy Ion Physics 11, 159 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Akkoyun et al., AGATA-Advanced GAmma Tracking Array. Nucl. Instr. Methods A 668, 26 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2011.11.081. [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Fernández-Fernández, High-energy fission and the onset of quasi-fission (PhD at Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 2024) http://hdl.handle.net/10347/34202. [Google Scholar]
  17. K.-H. Schmidt, B. Jurado, C. Amouroux, and C. Schmitt, General Description of Fission Observables: GEF Model Code. Nucl. Data Sheets 131, 107 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2015.12.009. GEF code version 2025.1.2. [Google Scholar]
  18. B.L. Tracy et al., Rb and Cs Isotopic Cross Sections from 40-60-MeV-Proton Fission of 238U, 232Th, and 235U. Phys. Rev. C 5, 222 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.5.222. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Steinhäuser et al., Odd-even effects observed in the fission of nuclei with unpaired protons. Nucl. Phys. A 634, 89 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00148-1. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Caamaño, F. Rejmund, and K.-H. Schmidt, Evidence for the predominant influence of the asymmetry degree of freedom on the even-odd structure in fission-fragment yields. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 38, 035101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/38/3/035101. [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Nifenecker et al., A Combinatorial Analysis of Pair Breaking in Fission. Z. Physik A 308, 39 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415847 [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Pommé et al., Excitation energy dependence of charge odd-even effects in the fission of 238U close to the fission barrier. Nucl. Phys. A 560, 689 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(93)90041-U [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Rejmund, A.V. Ignatyuk, A.R. Junghans, and K.-H. Schmidt, Pair breaking and even-odd structure in fission-fragment yields. Nucl. Phys. A 678, 215 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00322-5. [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Ramos et al., Experimental evidence of the effect of nuclear shells on fission dissipation and time. Phys. Rev. C 107, L021601 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.L021601 [Google Scholar]
  25. B. Montenegro Viñas and M. Caamaño, Study of the log-third-difference method for the computation of even-odd staggering in fission yields. Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 237 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01450-z [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Caamaño et al., Connection between nuclear structure, dissipation, and time in fission data. EPJ Web of Conferences 306, 01020 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202430601020. [Google Scholar]
  27. K.-H. Schmidt and B. Jurado, Entropy Driven Excitation Energy Sorting in Superfluid Fission Dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 212501 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.212501. [Google Scholar]
  28. B. Jurado and K.-H. Schmidt, Influence of complete energy sorting on the characteristics of the odd-even effect in fission-fragment element distributions. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 42, 055101 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/42/5/055101. [Google Scholar]
  29. F. Gönnenwein, The Nuclear Fission Process (C. Wagemans, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1991). 409–423 [Google Scholar]
  30. L.T. Bezzina, Examining equilibration in heavy ion fusion using precision cross section measurements (PhD at The Australian National University, 2022) https://doi.org/10.25911/FCPX-C451. [Google Scholar]
  31. L.T. Bezzina, E.C. Simpson, D.J. Hinde, and M. Dasgupta, Observation of suppression of heavy-ion fusion by slow quasifission. Nucl. Phys. A 1063, 123198 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2025.123198. [Google Scholar]
  32. A.C. Berriman, D.J. Hinde, M. Dasgupta, C.R. Morton, R.D. Butt, and J. O. Newton, Unexpected inhibition of fusion in nucleus-nucleus collisions. Nature 413, 144 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35093069. [Google Scholar]
  33. D. Ramos et al., Insight into excitation energy and structure effects in fission from isotopic information in fission yields. Phys. Rev. C 99, 024615 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.024615. [Google Scholar]
  34. D. Ramos, Fragment Distributions ofTransfer- and Fusion-Induced Fission from 238 U+12 C Reactions Measured Through Inverse Kinematics (PhD at Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 2016) https://hdl.handle.net/10347/15070. [Google Scholar]
  35. O.B. Tarasov and D. Bazin, LISE++: Radioactive beam production with in-flight separators. Nucl. Instr. Methods B 266, 4657 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.05.110. PACEIV code version 4.34.14. [Google Scholar]
  36. K.-H. Schmidt et al., Relativistic radioactive beams: A new access to nuclear-fission studies. Nucl. Phys. A 665, 221 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00384-X. [Google Scholar]
  37. C. Böckstiegel et al., Nuclear-fission studies with relativistic secondary beams: Analysis of fission channels. Nucl. Phys. A 802, 12 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.01.012. [Google Scholar]
  38. C. Schmitt and M. Caamaño, Novel insight into quasi-fission for advancing the understanding of reaction dynamics (Exp. E900_24, GANIL PAC November 2024). [Google Scholar]
  39. K. Hammerton et al., Reduced quasifission competition in fusion reactions forming neutron-rich heavy elements. Phys. Rev. C 91, 041602(R) (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.041602. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.