Open Access
| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 368, 2026
9th Heavy Ion Accelerator Symposium (HIAS 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 00022 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636800022 | |
| Published online | 13 May 2026 | |
- L. Meitner et al., Disintegration of Uranium by Neutrons: a New Type of Nuclear Reaction, Nature 143, 239 (1939).10.1038/143239a0 [Google Scholar]
- C. Böckstiegel et al., Nuclear-fission studies with relativistic secondary beams: Analysis of fission channels, Nuclear Physics A 802, 12 (2008). 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.01.012 [Google Scholar]
- K.H. Schmidt et al., Relativistic radioactive beams: A new access to nuclear-fission studies, Nuclear Physics A 665, 221 (2000). 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00384-X [Google Scholar]
- G. Scamps et al., Impact of pear-shaped fission fragments on mass-asymmetric fission in actinides, Nature 564, 382 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0780-0 [Google Scholar]
- A.N. Andreyev et al., New Type of Asymmetric Fission in Proton-Rich Nuclei, Physical Review Letters 105, 252502 (2010). 10.1103/Phys-RevLett.105.252502 [Google Scholar]
- B.M.A. Swinton-Bland et al., Mass-asymmetric fission of 205,207,209Bi at energies close to the fission barrier using proton bombardment of 204,206,208 Pb, Physical Review C 102, 054611 (2020). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.102.054611 [Google Scholar]
- E. Prasad et al., Observation of mass-asymmetric fission of mercury nuclei in heavy ion fusion, Physical Review C 91, 064605 (2015). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.91.064605 [Google Scholar]
- E. Prasad et al., Systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176Os to 206Pb, Physics Letters B 811, 135941 (2020). 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135941 [Google Scholar]
- B.M.A. Swinton-Bland et al., Multi-modal mass-asymmetric fission of 178Pt from simultaneous mass-kinetic energy fitting, Physics Letters B 837, 137655 (2023).10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137655 [Google Scholar]
- K. Nishio et al., Excitation energy dependence of fragment-mass distributions from fission of 180,190Hg formed in fusion reactions of 36Ar+144,154Sm, Physics Letters B 748, 89 (2015). 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.06.068 [Google Scholar]
- G. Scamps et al., Effect of shell structure on the fission of sub-lead nuclei, Physical Review C 100, 041602 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevC.100.041602 [Google Scholar]
- P. Morfouace et al., An asymmetric fission island driven by shell effects in light fragments, Nature 641, 339 (2025).10.1038/s41586-025-08882-7 [Google Scholar]
- J. Buete et al., Universality of shell effects in fusion-fission mass distributions, Physics Letters B 865, 139459 (2025).10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139459 [Google Scholar]
- R. Du Rietz et al., Mapping quasifission characteristics and timescales in heavy element formation reactions, Physical Review C 88, 054618 (2013). 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.054618 [Google Scholar]
- T. Banerjee et al., Systematic evidence for quasi-fission in 9Be-, 12C-, and 16O-induced reactions forming 258,260No, Phys. Rev. C 102, 024603 (2020). 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024603 [Google Scholar]
- D.J. Hinde et al., Conclusive evidence for the influence of nuclear orientation on quasifission, Physical Review C 53, 1290 (1996). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.53.1290 [Google Scholar]
- K.H. Schmidt et al., General Description of Fission Observables: GEF Model Code, Nuclear Data Sheets 131, 107 (2016).10.1016/j.nds.2015.12.009 [Google Scholar]
- V.E. Viola et al., Systematics of fission fragment total kinetic energy release, Physical Review C 31, 1550 (1985).10.1103/PhysRevC.31.1550 [Google Scholar]
- D.J. Hinde et al., Neutron emission as a probe of fusion-fission and quasifission dynamics, Physical Review C 45, 1229 (1992). 10.1103/Phys-RevC.45.1229 [Google Scholar]
- A.C. Wahl et al., Nuclear-Charge Distribution in Low-Energy Fission, Physical Review 126, 1112 (1962).10.1103/PhysRev.126.1112 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.