EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 368 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 368 (2026) 00032 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 368, 2026
9th Heavy Ion Accelerator Symposium (HIAS 2025)
Article Number 00032
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636800032
Published online 13 May 2026
  1. A. E. Stuchbery and J. L. Wood, To Shell Model, or Not to Shell Model, That Is the Question, Physics 4, 697 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/physics4030048 [Google Scholar]
  2. H. L. Crawford et. al., Unexpected distribution of V1/7/2 strength in 49Ca, Phys. Rev. C 96, 064317 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064317 [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Uozumi et. al., Single-particle strengths measured with 48Ca(d, p)49Ca reaction at 56 MeV, Nucl. Phys. A 576, 123 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(94)90740-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. M. E. Williams-Norton and R. Abegg, Study of low-lying levels in 47Ca with the 48Ca(d, t)47Ca reaction, Nucl. Phys. A 291, 429 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(77)90330-X [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Horoi et al., Statistical analysis for the neutrinoless double-ß-decay matrix element of 48Ca, Phys. Rev. C 106, 054302 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.054302 [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Weinholtz et. al., Masses of exotic calcium isotopes pin down nuclear forces, Nature 498, 346 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12226 [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Koszorus et. al., Charge radii of exotic potassium isotopes challenge nuclear theory and the magic character of N = 32, Nature 17, 439 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01136-5 [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Steppenbeck et. al., Evidence for a new nuclear 'magic number' from the level structure of 54Ca, Nature 502, 207 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12522 [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Chen et. al., Quasifree Neutron Knockout from 54Ca Corroborates Arising N = 34 Neutron Magic Number, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 142501 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.142501 [Google Scholar]
  10. A. H. Wuosmaa et al., A solenoidal spectrometer for reactions in inverse kinematics, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 580, 1290 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.07.029 [Google Scholar]
  11. J. C. Lighthall et. al., Commissioning of the HELIOS spectrometer, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 622, 97 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.06.220 [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Chen et. al., Evolution of the nuclear spin-orbit splitting explored via the 32Si(d, p)33Si reaction using SOLARIS, Phys. Lett. B 853, 138679 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138678 [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Watwood et. al., Valence 1 s–0d proton vacancy of the 32Si ground state, Phys. Rev. C 112, 054304 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/4lzs-mv3l [Google Scholar]
  14. T. L. Tang et. al., First Exploration of Neutron Shell Structure below Lead and beyond N = 126, Phys.Rev. Lett. 124, 062502 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.062502 [Google Scholar]
  15. J. E. Spencer and H. A. Enge, Split-pole magnetic spectrograph for precision nuclear spectroscopy, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 49, 181 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(67)90684-2 [Google Scholar]
  16. T. R. Ophel and A. Johnston, A focal plane detector for both light and heavy ions, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 157, 461 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(78)90005-8. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.