EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 369 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 369 (2026) 02006 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 369, 2026
4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applied Mathematics (JIAMA’26)
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 14
Section XAI and Data-Driven Optimization in Energy, Environment, and Economic Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636902006
Published online 13 May 2026
  1. H. H. Samir, M. R. Hameed, A. J. Abdullah, W. A. Ali, R. A. Suhail, S. J. Saba, and E. A. Al-Kareem, A two-stage UAV-based disaster analysis framework using MyUAV-CNN for scene classification and UDAnet for damage segmentation. Int. J. Adv. Signal Image Sci. 12, 1, 83–103 (2026). https://xlescience.org/index.php/IJASIS/article/view/883 [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Shukla and Shukla, S., Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based disaster detection and crowd sensing using deep learning models, in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Image Process. 414–419 (2025). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3700838.3703685 [Google Scholar]
  3. W. Yang, X. Zhang, P. Luo, Transferability of convolutional neural network models for identifying damaged buildings due to earthquake. Remote Sens. 13, 3, 504 (2021) https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/3/504 [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Demetris, S. Panayiotis, K. Christos, DiRecNetV2: A transformer-enhanced network for aerial disaster recognition. SN Comp. Sci. 5, 6 (2024). DOI: 10.1007/s42979-024-03066-y [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Li, S. Hao, and K. Zhao, A hybrid CNN–vision transformer structure for remote sensing scene classification. Remote Sens. Lett., 15, 1, 88–98 (2024) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2150704X.2024.2302348 [Google Scholar]
  6. D. K. Kang, M.J. Olsen, E. Fischer, J. Jaehoon, J. A. Adams, Deep learning transferability across disaster types for UAS imagery based building damage assessment. Discov Civ Eng 2, 196 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-025-00357-y [Google Scholar]
  7. U. Lagap and S. Ghaffarian, Enhancing post-disaster damage detection and recovery monitoring by addressing class imbalance in satellite imagery using enhanced super-resolution GANs (ESRGAN), Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XLVIII-G-2025, 853–860 (2025) https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-853-2025, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  8. B. J. Wheeler and H. A. Karimi, Deep learning-enabled semantic inference of individual building damage magnitude from satellite images. Algorithms. 13, 8, 195 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/a13080195 [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Tilon, F. Nex, N. Kerle, G. Vosselman, Post-disaster building damage detection from earth observation imagery using unsupervised and transferable anomaly detecting generative adversarial networks. Remote Sens. 12, 24, 4193 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244193 [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Chen, Y. Sun, L. Wang, L., H. Zhao, B. Yu, HRTBDA: a network for post-disaster building damage assessment based on remote sensing images. Int. J. Digit. Earth. 17, 1, 3957 (2025). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17538947.2024.2418880 [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Hatić, V. Polushko, M. Rauhut, H. Hagen, Post-disaster building damage assessment: Multi-class object detection vs. object localization and classification. Remote Sens. 17, 24, 3957. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17243957 [Google Scholar]
  12. M. S. Başarslan, C. Hikmet, UAV-based forest fire early warning and intervention simulation system with high-accuracy hybrid AI model. Appl. Sci. 16, 3, 1201 (2026). https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031201 [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Rajagopal, K. S. Monish, R. Deebalakshmi, R. K. Jagadeesh, Hybrid learning framework for synergistic fusion of SAR and optical UAV data in wildfire surveillance. Sci. Rep. 15, 42857 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26816-1 [Google Scholar]
  14. M. M. A. Zaid, , M. A. Ahmed, S. Putra, Remote sensing image classification using CNN and transfer learning techniques. J. Comput. Sci. 21, 3, 635–645 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2025.635.645 [Google Scholar]
  15. K. VanExel, S. Sherchan, S. Liu, Optimizing deep learning models for climate-related natural disaster detection from uav images and remote sensing data. J Imaging. 11, 2, 32 (2025). doi:10.3390/jimaging11020032 [Google Scholar]
  16. Z. Hong, H. Zhong, H. Pan, J. Liu, R. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Y. Han, J. Wang, S. Yang, C. Zhong, (2022). classification of building damage using a novel convolutional neural network based on post-disaster aerial images. Sensors, 22, 15, 5920 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155920 [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Alsaaran and A. Soudani, Deep learning image-based classification for post-earthquake damage level prediction using UAVs. Sensors. 25, 17, 5406 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175406 [Google Scholar]
  18. AIDER (Aerial Image Dataset for Emergency Response Applications) Version 1.0, https://zenoda.org/records/3888300. Access date 14/12/2025. [Google Scholar]
  19. X. Deng, M. Shi, B. Khan, Y. Choo, F. Ghaffar, C. Peng Lim, A lightweight CNN model for UAV-based image classification. Soft Comput 29, 2363–2378 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-025-10512-3 [Google Scholar]
  20. W. Chen, J. Geng, F. Meng, L. Zhang, Pseudo-ℒ0-Norm fast iterative shrinkage algorithm network: agile synthetic aperture radar imaging via deep unfolding network. Remote Sens. 16, 4, 671 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16040671 [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Tran, M. Tran, E. Marti, J. Cothren, C. Rainwater, S. Eksioglu, N. Le, Land8Fire: A Complete Study on Wildfire Segmentation Through Comprehensive Review, Human-Annotated Multispectral Dataset, and Extensive Benchmarking, Remote Sens. 17, 16, 2776 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17162776 [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Nurtas, S. Nurakynov, A. Altaibek, A. Mergembayeva, M. Mohammed, Satellite based deep learning approaches for detecting environmental disasters across Kazakhstan. Discov. Appl. Sci. 8, 144 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-08133-4 [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Kim, P. A. Campbell, K. Calhoun, a framework to predict community risk from severe weather threats using probabilistic hazard information (PHI). Atmosphere. 14, 5, 767 (2023).. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050767 [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Shao, J., Tang, L., Liu, M., Shao, G., Sun, L., Q. Qiu, BDD-Net: A general protocol for mapping buildings damaged by a wide range of disasters based on satellite imagery. Remote Sens. 12, 10, 1670 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101670 [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Jia and W. Ye, Deep learning for earthquake disaster assessment: objects, data, models, stages, challenges, and opportunities. Remote Sens. 15, 16, 4098 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15164098 [Google Scholar]
  26. D. P. Yadav, B. Sharma, S. Singh, P. Liatsis, Hybrid lightweight transformer for efficient landslide change detection in remote sensing imagery. Sci Rep 16, 2111 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31888-0V. [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Ahmed, K. Jouini, A. Tuama, and O. Korbaa, A fusion approach for enhanced remote sensing image classification, in Proceedings of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. Comput. Vis., Imaging Comput. Graph. Theory Appl. (VISIGRAPP). 2: 554–561 (2024). DOI: 10.5220/0012376600003660 [Google Scholar]
  28. E. O. Yilmaz and T. Kavzoglu, Burned area detection with Sentinel-2A data, ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. X-5-2024, (2024). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-5-2024-251-2024 [Google Scholar]
  29. K. VanExel, S. Sherchan, S. Liu, Optimizing deep learning models for climate-related natural disaster detection from UAV images and remote sensing data. J Imaging. 11, 2, 32(2025) doi:10.3390/jimaging11020032. PMID: 39997534; PMCID: PMC11856490. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.