Open Access
| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 372, 2026
Advanced Power Systems (APS 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01006 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Intelligent, Digital and Resilient Power Systems | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637201006 | |
| Published online | 11 June 2026 | |
- N.H. Abas, M.Z.A. Ab Kadir, N. Azis, J. Jasni, N.F. Ab Aziz, Z.M. Khurshid, Optimizing grid with dy- namic line rating of conductors: A comprehensive review. IEEE Access 12, 9738–9756 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3352595 [Google Scholar]
- J. Bendik, M. Cenky, L. Racz, B. Nemeth, Static line rating of overhead power lines in various Euro- pean countries, in Proceedings of the 24th Interna- tional Scientific Conference on Electric Power En- gineering (EPE), Kouty nad Desnou, Czech Repub- lic (2024), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/EPE61521.2024.10559563 [Google Scholar]
- R.F. Martinez, R. Alberdi, E. Fernandez, I. Albizu, M.T. Bedialauneta, Improvement of transmission line ampacity utilization via machine learning-based dy- namic line rating prediction. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 236, 110931 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2024.110931 [Google Scholar]
- CIGRE Working Group B2.42, Guide for thermal rat- ing calculations of overhead lines, CIGRE Technical Brochure 601, CIGRE, Paris, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- J. Wang, X. Xiong, J. Hu, X. Lu, Safety strategy of power transmission channel coordinated with transfer capability support for power system emergency. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 110, 232–245 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.03.017 [Google Scholar]
- F. Ye, J. Teh, Dynamic thermal rating in power sys- tems: A comprehensive review of techniques, im- plementation and reliability. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 226, 116392 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116392 [Google Scholar]
- J.E. Guevara Asorza, T.A. Papadopoulos, R.A. De Araujo, J. Pissolato Filho, Wave propagation analysis of HTLS conductors with equivalent electrical perfor- mance to conventional conductors. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 255, 112737 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2026.112737 [Google Scholar]
- E. Sainz-Ortiz, R. Martinez, A. Arroyo, M. Manana, S. Bustamente, L. Vejo, Dynamic line rating- based routing of overhead transmission lines for wind energy integration. Results Eng. 28, 107277 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107277 [Google Scholar]
- J.-R. Riba, Y. Liu, M. Moreno-Eguilaz, Analyzing the role of emissivity in stranded conductors for overhead power lines. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 159, 110027 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110027 [Google Scholar]
- J. Bendik, M. Cenky, M. Bindzar, Overhead electric lines I: Mechanics and ampacity of conductors. The- ory and examples (Spektrum STU, Bratislava, Slo- vakia, 2020), ISBN 978-80-227-4997-8. In Slovak. [Google Scholar]
- STN EN 50341-2-23, Overhead electrical lines with alternating voltage exceeding 1 kV – Part 2-23: Na- tional normative aspects (NNA) for Slovakia (based on EN 50341-1:2012), Slovak Technical Standard, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- P. Parvizi, M. Jalilian, K.D. Dearn, Evaluating the mechanical and thermal performance of high- temperature low sag (HTLS) conductors: A compara- tive study of ACCC, ACSS, and ACSR conductors. Results Eng. 26, 104735 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104735 [Google Scholar]
- L. Vejo, P. Castro, M. Manana, A. Laso, R. Lecuna, S. Bustamante, E. Sainz, Experimental study of dy- namic line rating applied to high-temperature low-sag conductors. Energies 18, 929 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/en18040929 [Google Scholar]
- T. Barton, P. Musilek, Probabilistic forecasting of dy- namic thermal line rating with temporal correlations. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 134, 107443 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107443 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.