EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 372 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 372 (2026) 05006 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 372, 2026
Advanced Power Systems (APS 2026)
Article Number 05006
Number of page(s) 7
Section Energy Policy, Markets and Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637205006
Published online 11 June 2026
  1. M. Krug et al., Implementing European Union Provisions and Enabling Frameworks for Renewable Energy Communities in Nine Countries: Progress, Delays, and Gaps, Sustainability 15, no. 11, 8861 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118861. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. M. Wittmayer, F. Avelino, B. Pel, I. Campos, Contributing to sustainable and just energy systems? The mainstreaming of renewable energy prosumerism within and across institutional logics. Energy Policy 149, 112053 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112053. [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Moser, L. Maturi, New horizons of the energy transition: challenges and opportunities for the building sector. TECHNE - J. Technol. Archit. Environ. 24, 40–45 (2022). https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-13440. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Brunetti et al., Development of an early design tool for the sustainability assessment of positive energy districts: methodology, implementation and case-studies. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2600, no. 8, 082020 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2600/8/082020. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Haase, D. Baer, Implementation of positive energy district concepts and energy master plans for decarbonization of districts. Acta Polytech. CTU Proc. 38 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14311/APP.2022.38.0546. [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Ferrante, T. Villani, Positive Energy Districts and Energy Efficiency in Buildings: An Innovative Technical Communication Sheet to Facilitate Policy Officers Understanding to Enable Technologies and Procedure, Energies 14, no. 24, 8551 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248551. [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Marrasso, C. Martone, G. Pallotta, C. Roselli, M. Sasso, A novel methodology and a tool for supporting the transition of districts and communities in Positive Energy Districts. Energy Build. 318, 114435 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114435. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Sareen et al., Ten questions concerning positive energy districts. Build. Environ. 216, 109017 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109017. [Google Scholar]
  9. F. De Filippi, C. Carbone, Positive Energy Buildings and Districts beyond the NZEB paradigm: towards a whole-life approach. TECHNE - J. Technol. Archit. Environ. 26, 86–93, (2023). https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-14447. [Google Scholar]
  10. V. Coors, R. Padsala, .Urban Digital Twins Empowering Energy Transition: Citizen-Driven Sustainable Urban Transformation towards Positive Energy Districts. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLVIII-4/W10-2024, 51–56 (2024). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W10-2024-51-2024. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. B. Andreucci, A. Marvuglia, Investigating, Implementing and Funding Regenerative Urban Design in a Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Built Environment: A Reading Through Selected UN Sustainable Development Goals and the European Green Deal. Rethinking Sustainability Towards a Regenerative Economy 15. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. B. Andreucci, A. Marvuglia, M. Baltov, P. Hansen, Eds, in Future City 15., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71819-0_22. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Bruck, S. Díaz Ruano, H. Auer, One piece of the puzzle towards 100 Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) across Europe by 2025: An open-source approach to unveil favourable locations of PV- based PEDs from a techno-economic perspective, Energy 254, 124152, (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124152. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Romano, M. B. Andreucci, E. Giancola, Positive Energy Districts and deep renovation actions to move beyond the 2025 EU Targets. J. Technol. Archit. Environ., no. 24, 242–253 (2022). https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-12887. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Best, M. Christ, T. Santarius, F. Wiese, Energiesuffizienz erforschen: Neue Herausforderungen und Chancen in Krisenzeiten, TATuP - Z. Für Tech. Theor. Prax. 31, no. 2, 11–17 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.31.2.11. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. S. Jørgensen, et al., Systematisation of experiences with energy sufficiency initiatives.WP2 report from “Integrating Energy Sufficiency into Modelling of Sustainable Energy Scenarios”, Baltic Nordic Energy Research Programme, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/systematisation-of-experiences-with-energy-sufficiency-initiative/ [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Kronby et al., Development of Nordic-Baltic competence and experience sharing of energy sufficiency., Baltic Nordic Energy Research Programme, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/development-of-nordic-baltic-competence-and-experience-sharing-of/ [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Sahakian, T. Fawcett, S. Darby, Energy sufficiency in buildings and cities: current research, future directions’, Build. Cities, 5, no. 1, pp. 692–703, Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.519. [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Leipziger, S.-E. Skaaning, M. Thorsen, Does economic inequality harm democratic quality? No, but yes, in No normal science!: festschrift for Kees van Kersbergen, Aarhus: Politica, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  20. G. M. Pelegrini et al., ‘White Paper: A Just Energy Transition in the EU’, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/white-paper-a-just-energy-transition-in-the-eu/ [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Crespy and M. Munta, Lost in transition? Social justice and the politics of the EU green transition. Transf. Eur. Rev. Labour Res. 29, no. 2, 235–251 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589231173072. [Google Scholar]
  22. B. Alpagut et al., A database for positive energy districts (PED). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2600, no. 8, 082018 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2600/8/082018. [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Van Dronkelaar, M. Dowson, C. Spataru, D. Mumovic, A Review of the Regulatory Energy Performance Gap and Its Underlying Causes in Non-domestic Buildings. Front. Mech. Eng. 1, (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2015.00017. [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Delzendeh, S. Wu, A. Lee, Y. Zhou, The impact of occupants’ behaviours on building energy analysis: A research review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 80, 1061–1071 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.264. [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Mahdavi et al., The Role of Occupants in Buildings’ Energy Performance Gap: Myth or Reality?. Sustainability 13, no. 6, 3146 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063146. [Google Scholar]
  26. N. Caballero, N. Della Valle, Tackling Energy Poverty Through Behavioral Change: A Pilot Study on Social Comparison Interventions in Social Housing Districts, Front. Sustain. Cities 2, 601095 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.601095. [Google Scholar]
  27. JPI Urban Europe, Reference Framework for Positive Energy Districts and Neighbourhoods, JPI Urban Europe, Viena, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://jpi-urbaneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/White-Paper-PED-Framework-Definition-2020323-final.pdf [Google Scholar]
  28. S. G. Krangsås et al., Positive Energy Districts: Identifying Challenges and Interdependencies. Sustainability 13, no. 19, 10551 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910551 [Google Scholar]
  29. A. B. Cristóbal, C. Sanz‐Cuadrado, K. Alves E Silva, L. Narvarte, Citizen Engagement for Social and Technological Innovation in Sustainable Energy Systems. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res., e202500268, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202500268. [Google Scholar]
  30. H. Vandevyvere, D. Ahlers, A. Wyckmans, The Sense and Non-Sense of PEDs—Feeding Back Practical Experiences of Positive Energy District Demonstrators into the European PED Framework Definition Development Process. Energies 15, no. 12, 4491 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124491 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Kozlowska et al., Positive Energy Districts: Fundamentals, Assessment Methodologies, Modeling and Research Gaps. Energies 17, no. 17, 4425 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174425. [Google Scholar]
  32. C. Chamaret, M. Guérineau, J. C. Mayer, When saying “enough” is not enough: How cultivating households’ mindfulness through gamification can promote energy sufficiency. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 105, 103294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103294. [Google Scholar]
  33. R. Murray, J. Caulier-Grice, G. Mulgan, The open book of social innovation. Great Britain: NESTA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  34. S. Lorek, J. H. Spangenberg, Energy sufficiency through social innovation in housing, Energy Policy 126, 287–294 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.026 [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Guilbert, Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption, Build. Cities 5, no. 1, (2024). https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.458. [Google Scholar]
  36. A. X. Hearn, Positive energy district stakeholder perceptions and measures for energy vulnerability mitigation. Appl. Energy 322, 119477 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119477. [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Barja-Martinez, M. Aragues-Penalba, A. Sumper, R. Villafafila-Robles, Local energy communities optimization considering cost and greenhouse gases minimization. 2025, arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2504.20973 [Google Scholar]
  38. F. Belmar, P. Baptista, D. Neves, Modelling renewable energy communities: assessing the impact of different configurations, technologies and types of participants. Energy Sustain. Soc. 13, no. 1, 18 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00397-1. [Google Scholar]
  39. R. M. Ryan, E. L. Deci, Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, no. 1, 68–78 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68. [Google Scholar]
  40. T. AlSkaif, I. Lampropoulos, M. Van Den Broek, W. Van Sark, Gamification-based framework for engagement of residential customers in energy applications. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 44, 187–195 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.043. [Google Scholar]
  41. I. Ajzen, The theory of planned behavior, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211(1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. [Google Scholar]
  42. R. Olivadese et al., Towards Energy Citizenship for a Just and Inclusive Transition: Lessons Learned on Collaborative Approach of Positive Energy Districts from the EU Horizon2020 Smart Cities and Communities Projects, in Proceedings of 8th Annual International Sustainable Places Conference (SP2020) Proceedings, MDPI, Jan. 2021, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020065020 [Google Scholar]
  43. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Ipcc), Ed., Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926. [Google Scholar]
  44. S. Erba, L. Pagliano, Combining Sufficiency, Efficiency and Flexibility to Achieve Positive Energy Districts Targets. Energies 14 (15), 4697 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154697. [Google Scholar]
  45. A. Bruck, S. Diaz Ruano, H. Auer, Values and implications of building envelope retrofitting for residential Positive Energy Districts. Energy Build 275, 112493 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. L. M. Fitzgerald, Winning coalitions for just transitions: Insights from the environmental justice movement. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 92, 102780 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102780. [Google Scholar]
  47. IEA, ‘World Energy Outlook 2020’, International Energy Agency, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  48. M. J. Cohen, New Conceptions of Sufficient Home Size in High-Income Countries: Are We Approaching a Sustainable Consumption Transition? Hous. Theory Soc. 38(2), 173–203 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1722218. [Google Scholar]
  49. P. Baptista, S. Melo, C. Rolim, Energy, Environmental and Mobility Impacts of Car- sharing Systems. Empirical Results from Lisbon, Portugal. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 111, 28–37(2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.035. [Google Scholar]
  50. A. Walliser et al., Exploring the Challenges of Environmental Planning and Green Design: Cases from Europe and the USA Renovating to Passive Housing in the Swedish Million Programme Regulative, facilitative and strategic contributions of planning to achieving low carbon development West Village: Development of a New Ecological Neighborhood in Davis, California The Aldo Leopold Legacy Center: Expanding the Definition of “Community” in Carbon Management Low carbon developments as laboratories of innovative planning tools Integrated planning for ecological urban regeneration Behind the Green Curtain: Shifting Goals and Shifting Roles Creating Post- Carbon Communities: The Return of the Public Sector. Plan. Theory Pract. 13(1), 113–174(2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.652007 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.