EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 375 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 375 (2026) 01001 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 375, 2026
Recent Technologies and Innovations in Electronics and Photonics (RTEP-2026)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 11
Section Photonics, Optics and Optical Materials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637501001
Published online 26 June 2026
  1. S.R. McNutt, Seismic monitoring and eruption forecasting of volcanoes: a review of the state-of-the-art and case histories, in Monitoring and Mitigation of Volcano Hazards (Springer, Heidelberg, 1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80087-0_3 [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Toh, J. Park, Review of vibration-based structural health monitoring using deep learning. Appl. Sci. 10, 1680 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051680 [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Ioana, C. Gervaise, Y. Stéphan, J.I. Mars, Analysis of underwater mammal vocalisations using time-frequency-phase tracker. Appl. Acoust. 71, 1070-1080 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  4. J.L. Miksis-Olds, B. Martin, P.L. Tyack, Exploring the ocean through soundscapes. Acoust. Today 14, 26-34 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. P.M. Kumar, A new human voice recognition system. Asian J. Sci. Appl. Technol. 5, 23-30 (2016). https://doi.org/10.51983/ajsat-2016.5.2.931 [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Chu, B. Champagne, A noise-robust FFT-based auditory spectrum with application in audio classification. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 16, 137-150 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2007.907569 [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Yoshizawa, S. Hirobayashi, T. Misawa, Noise reduction for periodic signals using high-resolution frequency analysis. EURASIP J. Audio Speech Music Process. 2011, 1-19 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-4722-2011-426794 [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Coady, D. Toal, T. Newe, G. Dooly, Remote acoustic analysis for tool condition monitoring. Procedia Manuf. 38, 840-847 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.165 [Google Scholar]
  9. B.C. Pijanowski, C.J. Brown, Grand challenges in acoustic remote sensing: discoveries to support a better understanding of our changing planet. Front. Remote Sens. 2, 824848 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2021.824848 [Google Scholar]
  10. I.F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, T. Melodia, Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. 3, 257-279 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2005.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Bradley, Atmospheric Acoustic Remote Sensing: Principles and Applications (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420005288 [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Collier, T. Dare, Accuracy of phase-based optical flow for vibration extraction. J. Sound Vib. 535, 117112 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2022.117112 [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Hermle, M. Gaeta, M. Krautblatter, M. Mazzanti, M. Keuschnig, Performance testing of optical flow time series analyses based on a fast, high-alpine landslide. Remote Sens. 14, 455 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030455 [Google Scholar]
  14. M.C. Hsieh, C.Y. Chang, C.H. Hsu, C.T.S. Ching, L.D. Liao, Comprehensive validation of a compact laser speckle contrast imaging system for vascular function assessment: from the laboratory to the clinic. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 63, 641-659 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-024-03211-y [Google Scholar]
  15. W. Heeman, W. Steenbergen, G.M. van Dam, E.C. Boerma, Clinical applications of laser speckle contrast imaging: a review. J. Biomed. Opt. 24, 080901 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.8.080901 [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Humeau-Heurtier, E. Guerreschi, P. Abraham, G. Mahé, Relevance of laser Doppler and laser speckle techniques for assessing vascular function: state of the art and future trends. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60, 659-666 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2013.2243449 [Google Scholar]
  17. S.Y. Kuzmin, S.S. Ulyanov, V.V. Tuchin, V.P. Ryabukho, Speckle and speckle-interferometric methods in cardiodiagnostics, in CIS Selected Papers: Coherence-Domain Methods in Biomedical Optics, vol. 2732, pp. 82-99 (SPIE, 1996). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.231688 [Google Scholar]
  18. A.K. Dunn, Laser speckle contrast imaging of cerebral blood flow. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40, 367-377 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0469-0 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Que, I. Cramer, L. Dekker, S. Overeem, A. Bouwman, S. Zinger, S. Stuijk, F. van Meulen, Speckle vibrometry for contactless instantaneous heart rate and respiration rate monitoring on mechanically ventilated patients. Sensors 24, 6374 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196374 [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Que, F. van Meulen, W. Verkruijsse, M. van Gastel, S. Overeem, S. Zinger, S. Stuijk, Speckle vibrometry for instantaneous heart rate monitoring. Sensors 23, 6312 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23146312 [Google Scholar]
  21. S.J. Rothberg, M.S. Allen, P. Castellini, D. Di Maio, J.J.J. Dirckx, D.J. Ewins, B.J. Halkon, P. Muyshondt, N. Paone, T. Ryan, H. Steger, An international review of laser Doppler vibrometry: making light work of vibration measurement. Opt. Lasers Eng. 99, 11-22 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.10.023 [Google Scholar]
  22. W.J. Staszewski, R. bin Jenal, A. Klepka, M. Szwedo, T. Uhl, A review of laser Doppler vibrometry for structural health monitoring applications. Key Eng. Mater. 518, 1-15 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.518.1 [Google Scholar]
  23. L. Maio, F. Ricci, V. Memmolo, E. Monaco, N.D. Boffa, Application of laser Doppler vibrometry for ultrasonic velocity assessment in a composite panel with defect. Compos. Struct. 184, 1030-1039 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.059 [Google Scholar]
  24. H. Tabatabai, D.E. Oliver, J.W. Rohrbaugh, C. Papadopoulos, Novel applications of laser Doppler vibration measurements to medical imaging. Sens. Imaging 14, 13-28 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11220-013-0077-1 [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Rothberg, Numerical simulation of speckle noise in laser vibrometry. Appl. Opt. 45, 4523-4533 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.45.004523 [Google Scholar]
  26. H.J. Rabal, R.A. Braga Jr. (eds.), Dynamic Laser Speckle and Applications (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315219080 [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Bianchi, Vibration detection by observation of speckle patterns. Appl. Opt. 53, 931-936 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.000931 [Google Scholar]
  28. B. Deepan, C. Quan, C.J. Tay, Quantitative vibration analysis using a single fringe pattern in time-average speckle interferometry. Appl. Opt. 55, 5876-5883 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.55.005876 [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Roelandt, Y. Meuret, G. Craggs, G. Verschaffelt, P. Janssens, H. Thienpont, Standardized speckle measurement method matched to human speckle perception in laser projection systems. Opt. Express 20, 8770-8783 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.008770 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. P. Padghan, N. Bhagat, K. Alti, A. Khamborkar, Using speckle contrast as a tool to track static and dynamic modifications of the surface, in National Conference on Recent Technologies and Innovations in Electronics and Photonics, pp. 51-56 (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68038-0_8 [Google Scholar]
  31. Y. Surkov, P. Timoshina, I. Serebryakova, D. Stavtcev, I. Kozlov, G. Piavchenko, I. Meglinski, A. Konovalov, D. Telyshev, S. Kuznetcov, E. Genina, V. Tuchin, Laser speckle contrast imaging with principal component and entropy analysis: a novel approach for depth-independent blood flow assessment. Front. Optoelectron. 18, 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12200-024-00143-1 [Google Scholar]
  32. Z.L. Sun, D.S. Huang, Y.M. Cheung, J. Liu, G.B. Huang, Using FCMC, FVS, and PCA techniques for feature extraction of multispectral images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2, 108-112 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2005.844169 [Google Scholar]
  33. A.K. Jain, A. Ross, S. Prabhakar, An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 14, 4-20 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2003.818349 [Google Scholar]
  34. C. Zhou, L. Wang, Q. Zhang, X. Wei, Face recognition based on PCA image reconstruction and LDA. Optik 124, 5599-5603 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.04.108 [Google Scholar]
  35. K.M. Ribeiro, R.A. Braga, G.W. Horgan, D.D. Ferreira, T. Safadi, Principal component analysis in the spectral analysis of the dynamic laser speckle patterns. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rapid Publ. 9, 14009 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2014.14009 [Google Scholar]
  36. Y.I. Surkov, I.A. Serebryakova, A.P. Fashchevskiy, P.A. Timoshina, E.A. Genina, V.V. Tuchin, PCA-LSCT: Software-implemented laser speckle contrast tomography for depth-resolved blood-flow mapping. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 32, 1-9 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2025.3647224 [Google Scholar]
  37. L. Yan, G. Du, X. Huang, Y. Xiao, J. Bian, Y. Zhang, H. Hou, M. Min, X. Chen, Enhancement of vascular visualization in laser speckle contrast imaging based on image algorithms. J. Biomed. Opt. 30, 056010 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.30.5.056010 [Google Scholar]
  38. H.L. Liu, Y. Yuan, L. Han, Y. Bi, W.Y. Yu, Y. Yu, Wide dynamic range measurement of blood flow in vivo using laser speckle contrast imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 29, 016009 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.1.016009 [Google Scholar]
  39. W. Cheng, Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, Acoustical source separation and identification using principal component analysis and correlation analysis. J. Vibroeng. 17, 1817-1827 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  40. M.N. Zakirov, S.N. Kulichkov, A.I. Chulichkov, N.D. Tsybulskaya, Recognition of signals from pulsed sources based on the form of wavelet spectra constructed by the principal component method. Dokl. Russ. Acad. Sci. Earth Sci. 517, 314-318 (2024). https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686739724080133 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.